Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 282-288

  Donk, Mieke ^a   Verburg, Roel C ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME; VISION;

ADULT; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; REACTION TIME; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 4644249148     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196571     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. BELOPOLSKY, A. V., THEEUWES, J., & KRAMER, A. E (in press). Prioritization by visual transients in search: Evidence against the visual marking account of the preview benefit. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
2. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
3. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2003). Prioritizing selection of new elements: Bottom-up versus top-down control. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1231-1242.
4. DUNCAN, J., WARD, R., & SHAPIRO, K. (1994). Direct measurement of attentional dwell time in human vision. Nature, 369, 313-315.
5. HUMPHREYS, G. W., KYLLINGSBÆK, S., WATSON, D. G., OLIVERS, C. N. L., LAW, I., & PAULSON, O. B. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioral and functional imaging procedures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 610-635.
6. JIANG, Y., CHUN, M. M., & MARKS, L. E. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 717-730.
7. KLEIN, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
8. KUNAR, M. A., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & SMITH, K. J. (2003). History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14, 181-185.
9. POSNER, M. I., & COHEN, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. PRATT, J., & MCAULIFFE, J. (2002). Inhibition of return in visual marking? The importance of the interstimulus interval and the type of search task. Visual Cognition, 9, 869-888.
11. THEEUWES, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 49, 83-90.
12. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130-134.
13. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attention inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
14. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 10, 601-621.
15. YANTIS, S., & JONIDES, J. (1990). Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Voluntary vs. automatic allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 121-134.