Contingent visual marking by transients

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 65, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 695-710

  Peterson, Matthew S ^a,b   Belopolsky, Artem V ^a   Kramer, Arthur F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MOTION PERCEPTION; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0141429993     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194807     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. ATCHLEY, P., & JONES, S. (2000, November). To mark or not to mark: Automaticity of visual marking. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 5, 93-94.
2. ATCHLEY, P., KRAMER, A. F., & HILLSTROM, A. (2000). Contingent capture for non-onsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 594-606.
3. BACON, W. F., & EGETH, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485-496.
4. BELOPOLSKY, A. V., PETERSON, M. S., & KRAMER, A. F. (2002a). Attentional mechanisms of visual marking: An event-related potential study. Paper presented at the annual workshop on object perception and memory, Kansas City, KS.
5. BELOPOLSKY, A. V., PETERSON, M. S., & KRAMER, A. F. (2002b). Electrophysiological analysis of visual marking: Evidence against the inhibition hypothesis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
6. DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2001). Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
7. FOLK, C. L., & REMINGTON, R. W. (1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 847-858.
8. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experiment Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030-1044.
9. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1993). Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 682-685.
10. FOLK, C. L., REMINGTON, R. W., & WRIGHT, J. H. (1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 20, 317-329.
11. GIBSON, B. S., LI, L., SKOW, E., BROWN, K., & COOKE, L. (2000). Searching for one versus two identical targets: When visual search has a memory. Psychological Science, 11, 324-327.
12. HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575-577.
13. ISHIHARA, S. (1989). Ishihara's tests for colorblindness: 24 plates edition. Tokyo: Kanehara.
14. JIANG, Y., CHUN, M. M., & MARKS, L. E. (2002a). Visual marking: Dissociating effects of new and old set size. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 293-302.
15. JIANG, Y., CHUN, M. M., & MARKS, L. E. (2002b). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 717-720.
16. KLEIN, R. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilities visual search. Nature, 334, 430-431.
17. KRAMER, A. F., CASSAVAUGH, N. D., IRWIN, D. E., & PETERSON, M. S. (2001). Influence of single and multiple onset distractors on visual search for singleton targets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 952-968.
18. KRISTJANSSON, A. (2000). In search of remembrance: Evidence for memory in visual search. Psychological Science, 11, 328-332.
19. LEHKY, S. R. (2000). Deficits in visual feature binding under isoluminant conditions. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 383-392.
20. LIVINGSTONE, M. S., & HUBEL, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416-3468.
21. LIVINGSTONE, M. S., & HUBEL, D. H. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy, physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740-749.
22. MARTIN-EMERSON, R., & KRAMER, A. F. (1997). Offset transients modulate attentional capture by sudden onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 739-751.
23. McLEOD, P., DRIVER, J., & CRISP, J. (1988). Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 332, 154-155.
24. McLEOD, P., DRIVER, J., DIENES, Z., & CRISP, J. (1991). Filtering by movement in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 55-64.
25. MILLER, J. (1989). The control of visual attention by abrupt visual onsets and offsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 567-571.
26. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2002). When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited-capacity inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 28, 22-42.
27. OLIVERS, C. N. L., WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1999). Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 679-715.
28. PETERSON, M. S., KRAMER, A. F., WANG, R. F., IRWIN, D. E., & McCARLEY, J. S. (2001). Visual search has memory. Psychological Science, 12, 287-292.
29. ROYDEN, C. S., WOLFE, J. W., & KLEMPEN, N. (2001). Visual search asymmetries in motion and optic flow fields. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 436-444.
30. SEKULER, A. B., & BENNETT, P. J. (2001). Common luminance changes induce grouping. Psychological Science, 6, 437-444.
31. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130-134.
32. TIPPER, S. P. (1985). The negative priming effect: Inhibitory priming by ignored objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 571-590.
33. VERGHESE, P., & PELLI, D. G. (1992). The information capacity of visual attention. Vision Research, 32, 983-995.
34. WATSON, D. G. (2001). Visual marking in moving displays: Feature-based inhibition is not necessary. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 74-84.
35. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
36. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 946-962.
37. WATSON, D. G., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1999). Segmentation on the basis of linear and local rotational motion: Motion grouping in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 70-82.