Solvation and rotational dynamics of coumarin 153 in ionic liquids: Comparisons to conventional solvents

Journal of Physical Chemistry B

Volumn 111, Issue 25, 2007, Pages 7291-7302

  Jin, Hui ^a   Baker, Gary A ^b   Arzhantsev, Sergei ^a   Dong, Jing ^a   Maroncelli, Mark ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION; ANISOTROPY; EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY; FREE ENERGY; SOLVATION; SOLVENTS;

POLAR SOLVENTS; SOLVENT VISCOSITY;

IONIC LIQUIDS;

EID: 34547347270     PISSN: 15206106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp070923h     Document Type: Article

References (100)

1. Freemantle, M. Chem. Eng. News 2007, 85 (1), 23-26.
2. Endres, F.; El Abedin, S. Z. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2006, 5, 2101-2116.
3. Chiappe, C.; Pieraccini, D. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2005, 18, 275-297.
4. Handy, S. T. Curr. Org. Chem. 2005, 959-988.
5. Wasserscheid, P.; Welton, T., Eds. Ionic Liquids in Synthesis; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003.
6. Abraham, M.; Acree, W. E. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 906-915.
7. Crosthwaite, J. M.; Muldoon, M. J.; Aki, S. N. V. K.; Maginn, E. J.; Brennecke, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 9354-9361.
8. Poole, C. F. J. Chromatogr., A 2004, 1037, 49-82.
9. Eike, D. M.; Brennecke, J. F.; Maginn, E. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 1039-1048.
10. Diedenhofen, M.; Eckert, F.; Klamt, A. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2003, 48, 475-479.
11. Anderson, J. L.; Ding, J.; Welton, T.; Armstrong, D. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14247-14254.
12. Mellein, B. R.; Aki, S. N. V. K.; Ladewski, R. L.; Brennecke, J. F. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 131-138.
13. Reichardt, C. Green Chem. 2005, 7, 339-351.
14. Werner, J. H.; Baker, S. N.; Baker, G. A. Analyst 2003, 126, 786-789.
15. Morgan, D.; Ferguson, L.; Scovazzo, P. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 4815-4823.
16. Evans, R. G.; Klymenko, O. V.; Price, P. D.; Davies, S. G.; Hardacre, C.; Compton, R. G. ChemPhysChem 2005, 6, 526-533.
17. Baker, S. N.; Baker, G. A.; Kane, M. A.; Bright, F. V. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 9663-9668.
18. Ingram, J. A.; Moog, R. S.; Ito, N.; Biswas, R.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5926-5932.
19. Arzhantsev, S.; Ito, N.; Heitz, M.; Maroncelli, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 381, 278-286.
20. Ito, N.; Arzhantsev, S.; Heitz, M.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 5771-5777.
21. Ito, N.; Arzhantsev, S.; Maroncelli, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 396, 83-91.
22. Chakrabarty, D.; Hazra, P.; Chakraborty, A.; Seth, D.; Sarkar, N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2003, 381, 697-704.
23. Chakrabarty, D.; Chakraborty, A.; Seth, D.; Hazra, P.; Sarkar, N. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 397, 460-474.
24. Chakraborty, A.; Seth, D.; Chakrabarty, D.; Setua, P.; Sarkar, N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 11110-11116.
25. Mali, K. S.; Dutt, G. B.; Mukherjee, T. J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 123, 174504.
26. Ito, N.; Huang, W.; Richert, R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 4371-4377.
27. Ito, N.; Richert, R. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 111, 5016-5022.
28. Paul, A.; Samanta, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4724-4731.
29. Funston, A. M.; Fadeeva, T. A.; Wishart, J. F.; Castner, E. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4963-4977.
30. Stratt, R. M.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 12981-12996.
31. Horng, M. L.; Gardecki, J. A.; Papazyan, A.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17311-17337.
32. Karmakar, R.; Samanta, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 4447-4452.
33. Karmakar, R.; Samanta, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6670-6675.
34. Karmakar, R.; Samanta, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7340-7346.
35. Saha, S.; Mandai, P. K.; Samanta, A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 3106-3110.
36. Mandal, P. K.; Samanta, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 15172-15177.
37. Arzhantsev, S.; Jin, H.; Ito, N.; Maroncelli, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 417, 524-529.
38. Arzhantsev, S.; Jin, H,; Baker, G. A.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4978-4989.
39. Chakrabarty, D.; Chakraborty, A.; Seth, D.; Sarkar, N. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 1764-1769.
40. Chowdhury, P. K.; Halder, M.; Sanders, L.; Calhoun, T.; Anderson, J. L.; Armstrong, D. W.; Song, X.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 10245-10255.
41. Headley, L. S.; Mukherjee, P.; Anderson, J. L.; Ding, R.; Halder, M.; Armstrong, D. W.; Song, X.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 9549-9554.
42. Mukherjee, P.; Crank, J. A.; Halder, M.; Armstrong, D. W.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 10725-10730.
43. Halder, M.; Headley, L. S.; Mukherjee, P.; Song, X.; Petrich, J. W. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 8623-8626.
44. Baker, S. N.; Baker, G. A.; Munson, C. A.; C., F.; Bukowski, E. J.; Cartwright, A. N.; Bright, F. V. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 6457-6463.
45. Lang, B.; Angulo, G.; Vauthey, E. J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 7028-7034.
46. Samanta, A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 13704-13716.
47. Mandai, P. K.; Saha, S.; Karmakar, R.; Samanta, A. Curr. Sci. 2006, 90, 301-310.
48. Weingärtner, H. Z. Phys. Chem. 2006, 220, 1395-1405.
49. Schrödle, S.; Annat, G.; MacFarlane, D. R.; Forsyth, M.; Buchner, R.; Hefter, G. Chem. Commun. 2006, 1748-1750.
50. Wu, J.; Stark, J. P. W. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2006, 17, 781-788.
51. Behar, D.; Neta, P.; Schultheisz, C. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 3139-3147.
52. Bradaric, C. J.; Downard, A.; Kennedy, C.; Robertson, A.; Zhou, Y. Green Chem. 2003, 5, 143-152.
53. Baker, S. N.; McCleskey, T. M.; Pandey, S.; Baker, G. A. Chem. Commun. 2004, 940-941.
54. Jin, H.; O'Hare, B.; Dong, J.; Arzhantsev, S.; Baker, G. A.; Wishart, J. F.; Benesi, A.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. B, to be submitted for publication.
55. -] (to < 30 ppm water) and remeasured the solvation dynamics at 298 K. The results obtained with this drier sample were well within the experimental uncertainties of the earlier results.
56. Gardecki, J. A.; Maroncelli, M. Appl. Spectrosc. 1998, 52, 1179-1189.
57. Heitz, M. P.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 5852-5868.
58. Maroncelli, M.; Fleming, G. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 86, 6221-6239.
59. Cross, A. J.; Fleming, G. R. Biophys. J. 1984, 46, 45-56.
60. Baker, S. N.; Baker, G. A.; Bright, F. V. Green Chem. 2002, 4, 165-169.
61. Huddleston, J. G.; Broker, G.; Willauer, H.; Rogers, R. D. In Ionic Liquids: Industrial Applications for Green Chemistry; Rogers, R. D., Seddon, K. R., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 818; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2002; pp 270-288.
62. Crowhurst, L.; Mawdsley, P. R.; Perez-Arlandis, J.; Salter, P. A.; Welton, T. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2003, 5, 2790-2794.
63. Carmichael, A. J.; Seddon, K. R. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2000, 13, 591-595.
64. Ogihara, W.; Aoyama, T.; Ohno, H. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 1414-1415.
65. Muldoon, M. J.; Gordon, C. M.; Dunkln, I. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 2001, 433-435.
66. Fletcher, K. A.; Storey, I. A.; Hendricks, A. E.; Pandey, S.; Pandey, S. Green Chem. 2001, 3, 210-215.
67. Reynolds, L.; Gardecki, J. A.; Frankland, S. J. V.; Horng, M. L.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 10337-10354.
68. Fletcher, K. A.; Pandey, S.; Storey, I. K.; Hendricks, A. E.; Pandey, S. Anal. Chim. Acta 2002, 453, 89-96.
69. Fee, R. S.; Maroncelli, M. Chem. Phys. 1994, 183, 235-247.
70. Krossing, I.; Slattery, J. M.; Daguenet, C.; Dyson, P. J.; Oleinkova, A.; Weingärtner, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 13427-13434.
71. 48 which we take to be more reliable.
72. Khajehpour, M.; Kauffman, J. J. Phys. Chem. A 2000, 104, 9512-9517.
73. Classer, L.; Jenkins, D. H. B. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 866-874.
74. rot) of the decays.
75. Allowing this parameter to vary in the fitting procedure typically yielded values between 0.36 and 0.38. However, in some cases allowing this parameter to vary led to significantly different values. For consistency we therefore fixed the value to 0.375, which was determined from the value in a glassy medium determined in ref 76.
76. Horng, M.-L.; Gardecki, J.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 1030-1047.
77. Ito, N.; Kajimoto, O.; Hara, K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6024-6029.
78. Cicerone, M. T.; Blackburn, F. R.; Ediger, M. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 104, 471-479.
79. Yang, M.; Richert, R. Chem. Phys. 2002, 284, 103-114.
80. Lopes, J. N. C.; Padua, A. A. H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 3330-3335.
81. Wang, Y.; Voth, G. A. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 18601-18608.
82. -] we measure 3.4 ± 0.5 ns, which is quite far from their correlation time of 28 ns. However, their large correlation time reflects the presence of a ∼200 ns component whose reality is presently uncertain and that would be impossible to detect in our experiments. If this component is neglected, then their time reduces to 3.8 ns, in agreement with our value.
83. Raineri, F. O.; Friedman, H. L. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1999, 107, 81-189.
84. Kapko, V.; Egorov, S. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 11145-11155.
85. Maroncelli, M.; Kumar, V. P.; Papazyan, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13-17.
86. Maroncelli, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 106, 1545-1555.
87. Weingärtner, H.; Knocks, A.; Schrader, W.; Kaatze, U. J. Phys. Chem. A 2001, 105, 8646-8650.
88. Daguenet, C.; Dyson, P. J.; Krossing, I.; Oleinikova, A.; Slattery, J.; Wakai, C.; Weingärtner, H. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 12682-12688.
89. Weingärtner, H.; Sasisanker, P.; Daguenet, C.; Dyson, P. J.; Krossing, I.; Slattery, J. M.; Schubert, T. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 4775-4780.
90. 43 have made a similar comparison in a fourth ionic liquid with apparently more satisfactory agreement between experiment and dielectric continuum calculations. However, their calculations ignore the missing fast components of ε(ω). Although the dielectric measurements that they employ extend to 90 GHz, even here when unobserved components in ε(ω) are accounted for in the approximate manner described in ref 38, the level of agreement between the calculated and observed solvation response is significantly degraded.
91. 3.
92. Ladanyi, B. M.; Maroncelli, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 3204-3221.
93. Abdallah, D. J.; Robertson, A.; Hsu, H. F.; Weiss, R. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3053-3062.
94. Chen, H.; Kwait, D. C.; Gonen, Z. S.; Weslowski, B. T.; Abdallah, D. J.; Weiss, R. G. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 4063-4072.
95. 99 might result from the reorientation being highly nonexponential in these liquids, which could invalidate the line shape analysis used.
96. Schröder, C.; Wakai, C.; Weingärtner, H.; Steinhauser, O. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 84511.
97. Wulf, A.; Ludwig, R.; Sasisanker, P.; Weingärtner, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 439, 323-326.
98. 29 as a function of viscosity show roughly the same amount of scatter as the majority grouping of solvents in Figure 10. The only clear deviation occurs for the two highest viscosity points (η > 3000 cP) where the times that they report (∼10 ns) are roughly a factor of 3 faster than expected.
99. Evans, R. G.; Wain, A. J.; Hardacre, C.; Compton, R. G. ChemPhysChem 2005, 6, 1035-1039.
100. Esperanca, J. M. S. S.; Guedes, H. J. R.; Blesic, M.; Rebelo, L. P. N. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2006, 51, 237-242.