Dipole solvation in nondipolar solvents: Experimental studies of reorganization energies and solvation dynamics

Journal of Physical Chemistry

Volumn 100, Issue 24, 1996, Pages 10337-10354

  Reynolds, L ^a   Gardecki, J A ^a   Frankland, S J V ^a   Horng, M L ^a   Maroncelli, M ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646102263     PISSN: 00223654     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp953110e     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Ooshika, Y. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 1954, 9, 594.
2. Lippert, E. Z. Electrochem. 1957, 61, 962.
3. McRae, E. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1957, 61, 562.
4. For reviews see: Koutek, B. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1978, 43, 2368.
5. Amos, A. T.; Burrows, B. L. Adv. Quantum Chem. 1973, 7, 289.
6. Malaga, N.; Kubota, T. In Molecular Interactions & Electronic Spectra; Mercel Dekker: New York, 1970; Vol. 371.
7. Bakhshiev, N. G.; Knyazhanskii, M. I.; Minkin, V. I.; Osipov, O. A.; Saidov, G. V. Russ. Chem. Rev. 1969, 38, 740.
8. For reviews see: Maroncelli, M. J. Mol. Liq. 1993, 57, 1.
9. Jarzeba, W.; Walker, G. C.; Johnson, A. E.; Barbara, P. F. Chem. Phys. 1991, 152, 57.
10. Barbara, P. F.; Jarzeba, W. Adv. Photochem. 1990, 15, 1. For more up-to-date references to recent papers in this field, see refs 4 and 5.
11. Kumar, P. V.; Maroncelli, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 3038.
12. Horng, M. L.; Gardecki, J. A.; Papazyan, A.; Maroncelli, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 17311.
13. Fee, R. S.; Maroncelli, M. Chem. Phys. 1994, 183, 235.
14. -1 level.
15. See, for example, the reviews: Bolton, J. R.; Archer, M. D. Adv. Chem. 1991, 228, 7.
16. Marcus, R. A.; Sutin, N. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1985, 811, 265.
17. Laurence, C.; Nicolet, P.; Dalati, M. T.; Abboud, J.-L. M.; Notario, R. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 5807.
18. Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J.-L. M.; Abraham, M. H.; Taft, R. W. J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 2877.
19. Reichardt, C. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 2319.
20. As estimated from the Claussius-Mossotti equation (see, for example: Bottcher, C. J. F. Theory of Electric Polarization, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1973).
21. Ma, J.; Bout, D. V.; Berg, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 9146.
22. Kamlet, M. J.; Abboud, J. L. M.; Taft, W. R. Prog. Phys. Org. Chem. 1981, 13, 485.
23. Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, 1261.
24. Gaussian 94, Revision B.l: Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B. G.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Keith, T.; Petersson, G. A.; Montgomery, J. A.; Raghavachari, K.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Ortiz, J. V.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Peng, C. Y.; Ayala, P. Y.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Replogle, E. S.; Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Binkley, J. S.; Defrees, D. J.; Baker, J.; Stewart, J. P.; Head-Gordon, M.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995.
25. Hehre, W. J.; Radom, L.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Pople, J. A. Ab Initio Molecular Orbital Theory; Wiley: New York, 1986.
26. Cox, S. R.; Williams, D. E. J. Comput. Chem. 1981, 2, 304. In fact, the slight overestimation of dipole moments is often looked on as an advantage when performing condensed phase simulations.
27. See for example: Cornell, W. D.; Cieplak, P.; Bayly, C. I.; Gould, I. R.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Ferguson, D. M.; Spellmeyer, D. C.; Fox, T.; Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 5179.
28. Chang and Castner [Chang, Y. J.; Castner, E. W., Jr. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 2684] have recently performed calculations of the dipole and quadrupole moments of three of the solvents studied here using a higher level of theory (6-3IG** BYLP-DFT). Their results are all within 10% of the ones presented here.
29. Extensive reviews of experimental values of quadrupole moment tensors include: Gray, C. G.; Gubbins, K. E. Theory of Molecular Fluids; Oxord: New York, 1984; Vol. 1.
30. Flygare, W. H.; Benson, R. C. Mol. Phys. 1971, 20, 225.
31. Sutter, D. H.; Flygare, W. H. Top. Curr. Chem. 1976, 63, 89. Specific references are as follows:
32. (a) Flygare, W. H.; Benson, R. C. Mol. Phys. 1971, 20, 225.
33. (b) Sutter, D. H.; Flygare, W. H. Top. Curr. Chem. 1976, 63, 89.
34. (c) Oldag, F.; Sutter, D. H. Z. Naturforsch. 1992, 47A, 527.
35. (d) Ellenbroek, A. W.; Dymanus, A. Chem. Phys. 1978, 35, 227.
36. (e) Copeland, T. G.; Cole, R. H. J. Chem. Phys. 1976, 64, 1741.
37. (f) Czieslik, W.; Wiese, J.; Sutter, D. H. Z. Naturforsch. 1976, 31A, 1210.
38. (g) Craven, I. E.; Hesling, M. R.; Laver, D. R.; Lukins, P. B.; Ritchie, G. L. D.; Vrbancich, J. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 627.
39. (h) Davies, G. J.; Chamberlain, J.; Davies, M. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1973, 69, 1223.
40. Ballaglia, M. R.; Buckingham, A. D.; Williams, J. H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1981, 78, 421.
41. (j) Slolze, W. H.; Slolze, M.; Hübner, D.; Sutter, D. H. Z. Naturforsch. 1982, 37A, 1165.
42. (k) Vrbancich, J.; Ritchie, G. L. D. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1980, 76, 648.
43. (l) Buckingham, A. D.; Disch, R. L. Proc. R. Soc. London 1963, A273, 275.
44. (m) Amos, R. D.; Battaglia, M. R. Mol. Phys. 1978, 36, 1517.
45. (n) Ritchie, G. L. D.; Vrbancich, J. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1980, 76, 1245.
46. Gray, C. G.; Gubbins, K. E. Theory of Molecular Fluids; Oxford: New York, 1984; Vol. 1.
47. Communication with Douglas Fox of Gaussian Inc.
48. Buckingham, A. D. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1967, 12, 107.
49. Ritchie, G. L. D.; Vrbancich, J. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 1980, 76, 1245.
50. (a) Singh, U. C.; Kollman, P. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1984, 5, 129.
51. (b) Besler, B. H.; Merz, K. M., Jr.; Kollman, P. A. J. Comput. Chem. 1990, 11, 431.
52. See, for example: Smith, J. W. Electric Dipole Moments; Butterworths: London, 1955.
53. Gubbins, K. E.; Gray, C. G.; Machado, J. R. S. Mol. Phys. 1981, 42, 817.
54. Gubbins, K. E.; Gray, C. G. Mol. Phys. 1981, 42, 842.
55. Moylan, C. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 13513.
56. AMPAC 5.0, Semichem Inc., 7128 Summit, Shawnee, KS 66216, 1994.
57. The semiempirical calculations were all carried out in the geometry optimized for the So state.
58. Rechthaler, K.; Kohler, G. Chem. Phys. 1994, 189, 99.
59. McCarthy, P. K.; Blanchard, G. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 12205.
60. Baumann, W.; Nagy, Z. Pure Appl. Chem. 1993, 65, 1729.
61. Baumann, W.; Nagy, Z.; Maiti, A. K.; Reis, H.; Rodrigues, S. V.; Detzer, N. In Dynamics and Mechanisms of Photoinduced Electron Transfer and Related Phenomena; Mataga, N., Okada, T., Masuhara, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1992; Vol. 211.
62. 23b recommended a scaling factor of 1.42 when determining ESP fit charges from MNDO calculations. Merz [Merz, K. M. J. Comput. Chem. 1992, 13, 749] later revised this value to 1.35 for molecules containing C, H, O, and N atoms.
63. 23b We also found the components of the quadrupole tensor were in relatively poor agreement with the ab initio values even though the overall magnitude 〈Q〉 = 21.5 matched rather well. For these reasons, using the MNDO-CI charges with appropriate scaling seems to offer the best choice for the present purposes.
64. See also: Carter, A. E.; Hynes, J. T. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 5961.
65. Maroncelli, M.; Fleming, G. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 89, 5044.
66. Haughney, M.; Ferrario, M.; McDonald, I. R. Mol. Phys. 1986, 58, 849.
67. Edwards, D. M. F.; Madden, P. A.; McDonald, I. R. Mol. Phys. 1984, 51, 1141.
68. 23 was used in the previous study, whereas we employ the value of 1.24 determined specifically for C153 in the present work.
69. 46 Thus, if one corrected the simulations for the missing electronic polarizability of the solvent, rather than being 10-20% too large, the calculated values would be ∼20% too small compared to the experimental values. In either case, the agreement is rather good, lending confidence in the potential models employed.
70. 1 state, the deviation from an isotropic orientational distribution is relatively minor. The effect of this small anisotropy on the energy fluctuations of interest here is probably negligible.
71. 2 were respectively
72. from: Bottani, E. J.; Bakaev, V.; Steele, W. A. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1994, 49, 2931.
73. Tildesley, D. J.; Madden, P. A. Mol. Phys. 1981, 42, 1137.
74. Maroncelli, M.; Kumar, V. P.; Papazyan, A. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 13.
75. Fourkas, J. T.; Benigno, A.; Berg, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 8552.
76. Fourkas, J. T.; Berg, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 7773.
77. Berg, M. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 228, 317.
78. Bagchi, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 100, 6658.
79. However, in some cases, such as propylene carbonate studied in ref 12, viscoelastic and dielectric theories can also lead to very similar predictions.
80. See, for example: Gubbins, K. E.; Twu, C. H. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1978, 33, 863.
81. Twu, C. H.; Gubbins, K. E. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1978, 33, 879.
82. Nikki, K.; Nakagawa, N. Magn. Reson. Chem. 1985, 23, 432.
83. Nikki, K.; Nakagawa, N. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1978, 51, 3267.
84. Perng, B.-C.; Newton, M. D.; Raineri, F. O.; Friedman, H. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 104, 7153, 7177.
85. Raineri, F. O. Private communications.
86. See, for example: Castner, E. W.; Chang, Y. J.; Chu, Y. C.; Walrafen, G. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 653.
87. Roy, S.; Bagchi, B. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 4150.
88. Ladanyi, B. M.; Liang, Y. Q. Interaction-Induced Contributions to Polarizability Anisotropy Relaxation in Polar Liquids. J. Chem. Phys., in press.
89. Raineri, F. O.; Friedman, H. L. J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 6111.
90. Buckingham, A. D. In Intermolecular Interactions: from Diatomics to Biopolymers; Pullman, B., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Chichester, 1978.
91. Kielich, S. In Specialist Periodical Reports; Davies, M., Ed.; The Chemical Society: London, 1972; Vol. 1.
92. Rein, R. Adv. Quantum Chem. 1973, 7, 335.