Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists' field mobility?

Scientometrics

Volumn 72, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 469-486

  Hellsten, Iina ^a   Lambiotte, Renaud ^b   Scharnhorst, Andrea ^a   Ausloos, Marcel ^b  

^a ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547281849     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-1680-5     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. AKSNES, D. W. (2003), A macro study of self-citation, Scientometrics, 56 (2): 235-246.
2. BARABÁSI, A. L., JEONG, H., NÉ DA, Z., RAVASZ, E., SCHUBERT, A., VICSEK, T. (2002), Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations, Physica A, 311 (3-4): 590-614.
3. BONZI, S., SNYDER, H. W. (1991), Motivations for citation: A comparison of self citation and citation to others, Scientometrics, 21 (2): 245-254.
4. BOROKHOVICH, K., BRICKER, R., SIMKINS, B. (1994), Journal communication and influence in financial research, The Journal of Finance, 49 (2): 713-725.
5. BRUCKNER, E., EBELING, W., SCHARNHORST, A. (1990), The application of evolution models in scientometrics, Scientometrics, 18 (1-2): 21-41.
6. BURGER, M., BUJDOSÓ, E. (1985), Oscillating chemical radions as an example of the development of science, In: FIELD, R., BURGER, M. (Eds), Oscillations and Traveling Waves in Chemical Systems, pp. 565-604.
7. BORNER, K., CHEN, C. M., BOYACK, K. W. (2003), Visualizing knowledge domains, Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37: 179-255.
8. BORNER, K., DALL'ASTA, L., KE, W., VESPIGNANI, V. (2005), Studying the emerging global brain: analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams, Complexity, 10 (4): 57-67.
9. BOYACK, K. W., KLAVANS, R., BORNER, K (2005), Mapping the backbone of science, Scientometrics, 64 (3): 351-374.
10. CAHLIK, T., JIRINA, M. (2006), Law of cumulative advantages in the evolution of scientific fields, Scientometrics, 66 (3): 441-449.
11. CHEN, C. M. (2003), Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization. Springer, Berlin et al.
12. CLAUSET, A. (2005), Finding local community structure in networks, Physical Review E, 72 (2): 026132.
13. CRONIN, B., SHAW, D. (2002), Identity-creators and image-makers: Using citation, analysis and thick description to put authors in their place, Scientometrics, 54 (1): 31-49.
14. DERENYI, I., PALLA, G., VICSEK, T. (2005), Clique percolation in random networks, Physical Review Letters, 94 (16): 160202.
15. DYUMENTON, G. G. (1987), Seti nauchnykh kommunikatsii i organizatsiya fundamental'nykh issledovanii. Nauka, Moskva.
16. EBELING, W. (1976), Strukturbildung bei irreversiblen Prozessen. Einführung in die Theorie dissipativer Strukturen. Teubner-Verlag Leipzig 1976.
17. EBELING, W., FEISTEL, R. (1982), Physik der Selbstorganisation und Evolution. Akademie-Verlag Berlin (Second edition 1986).
18. EBELING, W., SCHARNHORST, A. (1986), Selforganization models for field mobility of physicists, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B, 36: 43-46.
19. EBELING, W., SCHWEITZER, F., TILCH, B. (1999), Active Brownian particles with, energy depots modeling animal mobility, Biosystems, 49: 17-29.
20. FORTUNATO, S., LATORA, V., MARCHIORI, M. (2004), A method to find community structure based on information centrality, Physical Review E, 70 (5): 056104.
21. GARFIELD, E. (1955), Citation indexes for science, Science, 122 (3159): 108-111.
22. GARFIELD, E. (1972), Citation, analysis as a tool, in journal evolution, Science, 178 (60): 471-479.
23. GARFIELD, E. (1973), Historiographs, librarianship, and the history of science, In: RAWSKI, C. H. (Ed.), Toward a Theory of Librariamhip: Papers in Honor of Jesse Hauk Shera. Metuchen, N.J.: Sacrecrow press, pp. 380-402.
24. Reprinted in: GARFIELD, E. (1974-1976), Essays of an Information Scientist, Vol. 2, pp. 136-150.
25. GARFIELD, E. (1977), Essays of an Information Scientist: Volume 1-15. ISl Press Philadelphia.
26. GARFIELD, E., PUDOVKIN, A. I., ISTORNIN, V. S. (2003), Why do we need algorithmic historiography'? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (5): 400-412.
27. GARFIELD, E. (2004), Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature, Journal of Information Science, 30(2): 119-145.
28. GILBERT, G. N. (1977), Competition, differentiation and careers in science, Social Science Information, 16 (1): 103-123.
29. GIRVAN, M., NEWMAN, M. E. J. (2002), Community structure in social, and biological networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99 (12): 7821-7826.
30. GLÄNZEL, W., THUS, B. (2004), Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations? Scientometrics, 61 (3): 395-404.
31. GLÄNZEL, W., THUS, B., SCHLEMMER, B. (2004), A. bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication, Scientometrics, 59 (1): 63-77.
32. GRIMMETT, G. (1999), Percolation. A Series of Comprehensive Studies in Mathematics, Vol. 321. Springer, Berlin et al.
33. HARGENS, L. L (1986), Migration patterns of U.S. Ph.D.s among disciplines and specialties, Scientometrics, 9(3-4): 145-164.
34. HELLSTEN, I., LAMBIOTTE, R., SCHARNHORST, A., AUSLOOS, M. (2006), A journey through the landscape of physics and beyond - the self-citation patterns of Werner Ebeling, Ih: PÖ SCHEL, T., MALCHOW, H., SCHIMANSKY GEIER, L. (Eds), Irreversible Prozesse und Selbstorganisation, Berlin: Logos Verlag, pp. 375-384.
35. HOPCROFT, J., KHAN, O., KULIS, B., SELMAN, B. (2004), Tracking evolving communities in large linked networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1.01 (suppl, 1): 5249-5253.
36. HOUTEN, J., VAN VUREN, H. G., LE PAIR, C., DUKHUIS, G. (1983), Migration of physicists to other academic disciplines: situation in the Netherlands, Scientometrics, 5 (4): 257-267.
37. HUTSON, S. R. (2006), Self-citation in Archaeology: Age, gender, prestige, and the self, Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 13 (1): 1-18.
38. HYLAND, K. (2001), Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles, English for Specific Purposes, 20: 207-226.
39. HYLAND, K. (2003), Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (3): 251-259.
40. KUHN, T. (1962), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
41. LAMBIOTTE, R., AUSLOOS, M. (2005), Uncovering collective listening habits and music genres in bipartite networks, Physical Review E, 72 (6): 066107.
42. LAMBIOTTE, R., AUSLOOS, M. (2006), On the genre-fication of music: a percolation approach, The European Physical Journal B, 50(1-2): 183-189.
43. LE PAIR, C. (1980), Switching between academic disciplines in universities in the Netherlands, Scientometrics, 2 (3): 177-191.
44. LEYDESDORFF, L. (1989), Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43 (1): 5-25.
45. LEYDESDORFF, L., AMSTERDAMSKA, O. (1990), Dimensions of citation analysis, Science, Technology and Human Values, 15 (3): 305-335.
46. LEYDESDORFF, L., Mapping interdisciplinarity at the interfaces between the Science Citation Index and the Social. Science Citation Index, Scientometrics (forthcoming).
47. MACROBERTS, M., MACROBERTS, B. (1988), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (5): 342-349.
48. MARSHAKOVA, I. V. (1988), Sistema Tsitirovaniya. Nauka, Moskva.
49. MOED, H. F. (2005), Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer, Dordrecht.
50. MORILLO, F., BORDONS, M., GOMEZ, I. (2003), Interdisciplinarity in science: a tentative typology of disciplines and research areas, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (13): 1237-1249.
51. NEWMAN, M. E. J. (2001), The structure of scientific collaboration networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98 (2): 404-409.
52. NEWMAN, M. E. J., PARK, J. (2003), Why social networks are different from other types of networks, Physical Review E, 68: 036122.
53. NOYONS, E. C. M. (1999), Bibliometric Mapping as a Science Policy and Research Management Tool. DSWO Press, Leiden.
54. PERSSON, O., BECKMANN, M., (1995), Locating the network of interacting authors in scientific specialties, Scientometrics, 33 (3): 351-366.
55. PICHAPPAN, P. (1995), A dual refinement of journal self-citation measures, Scientometrics, 33 (1): 13-21.
56. PICHAPPAN, P., SARAS VADY, S. (2002), The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations, Scientometrics, 54 (2): 285-290.
57. PIERCE, S. J. (1999), Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50 (2): 271-279.
58. PRICE, D. J. D. (1965), Networks of scientific papers, Science, 149 (3683): 510-515.
59. RAAN, A. F. J, VAN (2006a), Performance-related differences of bibliometric statistical properties of research groups: cumulative advantages and hierarchically layered, networks, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57 (14): 191-1935.
60. th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, 07-09 September 2006, Leuven, Belgium, Book of Abstracts, p. 150.
61. REDNER, S. (2005), Citation Statistics from 1.10 Years of Physical Review, Physics Today, 58 (6): 49.
62. RINIA, E. J., VAN LEEUWEN, T. N., BRUINS, E. E. W., VAN VUREN, H. G., VAN RAAN, A. F. J. (2002), Measuring knowledge transfer between fields of science, Scientometrics, 54 (3): 347-362.
63. SCHARNHORST, A. (1996), Self-organization and science - a scientometric approach, In: FREUND, J. A. (Ed.), Dynamik, Evolution, Strukturen. Verlag Dr. Köster, Berlin, pp.277-287.
64. SCHARNHORST, A. (2001), Constructing knowledge landscapes within the framework of geometrically oriented evolutionary theories, In: MATTHIES, M., MALCHOW, H., KRIZ, J. (Eds), Integrative Systems Approaches to Natural and Social Dynamics, Springer, pp. 505-515.
65. SCHWEITZER, F. (2003), Brownian Agents and Active Particles. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
66. SMALL, H., GRIFFITH, B. (1974), The structure of scientific literatures I: Identifying and graphing specialties, Science Studies, 4 (1): 17-40.
67. SMALL, H. (2003), Paradigms, citations and maps of science: A personal history, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (5): 394-399.
68. SNYDER, H., BONZI, S. (1998), Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989), Journal of Information Science, 24 (6): 431-435.
69. STAUFFER, D., AHARONY, A. (1994), Introduction to Percolation Theory; 2nd Edition. Taylor & Francis, London.
70. URATA, H. (1990), Information flows among academic disciplines in Japan, Scientometrics, 18 (3-4): 309-319.
71. URBAN, D. (1982), Mobility and the growth, of science, Social Studies of Science, 12 (3): 409-433.
72. VLACHY, J. (1981), Mobility in physics - a bibliography of occupational, geographic and field mobility of physicists, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics B, 31 (6): 669-674.
73. WAGNER-DOEBLER, R., BERG J. (1993), Mathematische Logik von 1847 bis zur Gegenwart. Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, New York.
74. WHITE, H., (2001), Authors as citers over time, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (2): 78-108.
75. WOUTERS, P. (1999), The Citation Culture. University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science. Unpublished PhD Thesis.