Self-citation and self-reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 251-259

  Hyland, Ken ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; BIBLIOGRAPHIES; DATA REDUCTION; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING;

INFORMETRICS;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 0037322737     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.10204     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
2. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: intellectual inquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Milton Keynes, UK: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
3. Bonzi, S., & Snyder, H.W. (1991). Motivations for citation: a comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics, 21(2), 245-254.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Oxford: Polity Press.
5. Chargaff, E. (1974). Building the Tower of Babel. Nature, 248 (April 26), 778.
6. th Ed. (1978). Washington, DC: American Institute of Biological Sciences
7. Crick, F. (1990). What Mad Pursuit. London: Penguin Books.
8. Cronin, B., & Shaw, D. (2002). Identity-creators and image-makers: using citation analysis and thick description to put authors in their place. Scientometrics, 54 (1), 31-49.
9. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Harlow: Longman.
10. Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
11. Hagstrom, W.O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
12. Halloran, S. (1984). The birth of molecular biology: an essay in the rhetorical criticism of scientific discourse. Rhetoric Review, 3, 70-83.
13. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20(3), 341-367.
14. Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.
15. Judson, H. (1995). The eighth day of creation: the makers of the revolution in biology. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
16. Kellenberger, E. (1989). Origins of molecular biology. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 7, 231-234.
17. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Lachowicz, D. (1981). On the use of the passive voice for objectivity, author responsibility and hedging in EST. Science of Science, 2(6), 105-115.
19. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: the social construction of scientific facts. Beverly Hills: Sage.
20. Lawani, S. (1982). On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33, 281-284.
21. Manual on scientific writing. (1993). Collingwood, Vic: Tafe Publications.
22. th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. (pp 511-522) Sydney: BIRG
23. Phelan, T.J. (1999). A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics, 45(1), 117-136.
24. th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics. (pp 523-527) Sydney: BIRG
25. Rousseau, R. (1999). Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals. Scientometrics, 44(3), 521-531.
26. Tagliacozzo, R. (1977). Self-citations in scientific literature. Journal of Documentation, 33(4), 265.
27. White, H. (2001). Authors as citers over time. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(2), 87-108.
28. Whitley, R. (1984). The intellectual and social organisation of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.