Self-citation in archaeology: Age, gender, prestige, and the self

Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-18

  Hutson, Scott R ^a  

^a Dumbarton Oaks Research Library   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship; Citation analysis; Prestige; Socio politics of archaeology

Indexed keywords

EID: 33747887676     PISSN: 10725369     EISSN: 15737764     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10816-006-9001-5     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. Aksnes, D. W. (2003). A macro-study of self-citation. Scientometrics 56(2): 235-246.
2. Barnes, B. (1985). About Science, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
3. Baxter, J. E. n.d. The Stories behind the numbers: Gendered perspectives of archaeology among its practitioners. Poster presented at the Annual Meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, March 31, 2005.
4. Beaudry, M., and White, J. (1994). Cowgirls with the blues? A study of women's publication and the citation of women's work in Historical Archaeology. In Claassen, C. (ed.), Women in Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 138-158.
5. Becher, T., and Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Philadelphia.
6. Binford, L. R. (1968). Archaeological perspectives. In Binford, L. R., and Binford, S. R. (eds.), New Perspectives in Archaeology, Aldine, Chicago, pp. 5-32.
7. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus, Translated by R. Nice, Stanford University Press, Stanford.
8. Clifford, J., and Marcus, G. (eds.) (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. University of California Press, Berkeley.
9. Conkey, M. W. (2002). Expanding the archaeological imagination. American Antiquity 67: 166-168.
10. Conkey, M., and Wylie, A. (in press). Doing Archeology as a Feminist, School of American Research Press, Santa Fe.
11. Conkey, M., and Tringham, R. (1996). Archaeology and the goddess: Exploring the contours of feminist archaeology. In Stewart, A., and Stanton, D. (eds.), Feminisms in the Academy: Rethinking the Disciplines, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 199-247.
12. Conkey, M., and Williams, S. (1991). Original narratives: The political economy of gender in archaeology. In di Leonardo, M. (ed.), Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Post-Modern Era, University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 102-139.
13. Foucault, M. (1979). What is an author? In Harari, J. (ed.), Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 141-160.
14. Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse, Translated by I. McLeod. In Young, R. (ed.), Untying the Text, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 48-77.
15. Geertz, C. (1988). Works and Lives: The Anthropologist as Author. Stanford University Press, Stanford.
16. Gero, J. (1996). Archaeological practice and gendered encounters with field data. In Wright, R. (ed.), Gender and Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 251-280.
17. Glanzell, W., Thijs, B., and Schlemmer, B. (2004). A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citation in scientific communication. Scientometrics 59:(1) 63-77.
18. Hamermesh, D. S., Johnson, G. E., and Weisbrod, B. A. (1982). Scholarship, citations and salaries: Economic rewards in economics. Southern Economic Journal 49: 472-81.
19. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated fnowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14: 575-99.
20. Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
21. Hodder, I. (1989). Writing archaeology: Site reports in context. Antiquity 63: 263-274.
22. Hutson, S. R. (1998). Strategies for the reproduction of prestige in archaeological discourse. Assemblage 4: http://www.shef.ac.uk/~ assem/4/.
23. Hutson, S. R. (2002). Gendered citation practices in American Antiquity and other archaeology journals. American Antiquity 67: 195-209.
24. Institute for Scientific Information (1998-1999). Journal Citation Reports, ISI: Philadelphia.
25. Joyce, R. A. (2002). The Languages of Archaeology, Blackwell, Oxford.
26. Latour, B. (1994). Pragmatogonies: A mythical account of how humans and non-humans swap properties. American Behavioral Scientist 37(6): 791-808.
27. Layton, R. (ed.) (1989). Who Needs the Past? Indigenous Values and Archaeology, Unwin Hyman, London.
28. Leenhardt, M. (1979 [19471). Do Kamo, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
29. Lowenthal, D. (1990). Conclusion: Archaeologists and others. In Gathercole, P., and Lowenthal, D. (eds.), The Politics of the Past, Unwin Hyman, London, pp. 302-314
30. Lutz, C. (1990). The erasure of women's writing in sociocultural anthropology. American Ethnologist 17:611-627.
31. MacRoberts, M. H., and MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 40(5): 342-349.
32. Morrison, B. A. (n.d.). Juggling a family and career. Poster presented at the Annual Meetings of the Society for American Archaeology, Salt Lake City, March 31, 2005.
33. Nelson, M. C., Nelson, S. M., and Wylie, A. (eds.) (1994). Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology, Archaeological Paper of the American Anthropological Association Number 5, Washington, DC.
34. Paynter, R. (1983). Field or factory? Concerning the degradation of archaeological labor. In Gero, J., Lacy, D. M., and Blakey, M. L. (eds.), The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, Research Reports Number 23, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, pp. 17-30.
35. Redman, C. (1991). Distinguished lecture in archaeology: In defense of the seventies: The adolescence of new archaeology. American Anthropologist 93: 295-307.
36. Reid, J. (1990). Editor's corner: American Antiquity and space. American Antiquity 55: 449-450.
37. Rosenswig, R. (2005). A tale of two antiquities: Evolving editorial policies of the SAA journals. The SAA Archeological Record 5(1): 15-21.
38. Rountree, K. (2001). The past is a foreigners' country: Goddess feminists, archaeologists, and the appropriation of prehistory. Journal of Contemporary Religion 16: 5-27.
39. Snyder, H., and Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989). Journal of Information Science 24(6): 431-435.
40. Sterud, E. (1978). Changing aims of Americanist archaeology: A citations analysis of American Antiquity 1946-1975. American Antiquity 43: 294-302.
41. Strathern, M. (1988). The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia, University of California Press, Berkeley.
42. Swidler, N., Dongoske, K., Anyon, R., and Downer, A. (eds.) (1997). Native Americans and Archaeologists. Stepping Stones to Common Ground, Altamira Press, Walnut Creek.
43. Tagliacozzo, R. (1977). Self-citation in scientific literature. Journal of Documentation 3: 251-265.
44. Tilley, C. (1989). Discourse and power: the genre of the Cambridge inaugural lecture. In Miller, D., Rowlands, M., and Tilley, C. (eds.), Domination and Resistance, Routledge, London, pp. 41-62.
45. Tilley, C. (1990). On modernity and archaeological discourse. In Bapty, I., and Yates, T. (eds.), Archaeology after Structuralism, Routledge, London, pp. 127-152.
46. Tringham, R., and Conkey, M. (1998). Rethinking figurines. A critical view from archaeology of Gimbutas, the 'Goddess' and popular culture. In Goodison, L., and Morris, C. (eds.), Ancient Goddesses, The Myths and the Evidence, British Museum Press, London, pp. 22-45.
47. Victor, K., and Beaudry, M. (1992). Women's participation in American prehistoric and historic archaeology: A comparative look at the journals American Antiquity and Historical Archaeology. In Claassen, C. (ed.), Exploring Gender through Archaeology, Prehistory Press, Madison, pp. 11-22.
48. Watkins, J. (2000). Indigenous Archaeology, Altamira, Walnut Creek, CA.
49. Wobst, M., and Keene, A. (1983). Archaeological explanation as political economy. In Gero, J., Lacy, D. M., and Blakey, M. L. (eds.), The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, Research Reports Number 23, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, pp. 79-90.
50. Wylie, A. (1983). Comments on the 'socio-politics of archaeology': The demystification of the profession. In Gero, J., Lacy, D. M., and Blakey, M. L. (eds.), The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, Research Reports Number 23, Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, pp. 119-130.