Carpology, seed anatomy and taxonomic relationships of Tetracentron (Tetracentraceae) and Trochodendron (Trochodendraceae)

Annals of Botany

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 413-443

  Doweld, Alexander B ^a  

^a c o National Institute of Carpology   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Altingiaceae; Bucklandiaceae; Carpology; Cercidiphyll aceae; Di lleniaceae; Dilleniales; Eupteleaceae; Hama melidaceae; Hamamel idales; Nordenskioldia; Palaeobotany; Pericarp anatomy; Phylogenetic relationships; Platanace ae; Rhodoleiaceae; Seed anatomy; Systematics; Tetracentraceae; Tetracentron sinense Oliv.; Theales; Trochode ndroides; Trochodendraceae; Trochodendrales; Trochodendrocarpus; Trochodendroid es; Trochodendron aralioides Sieb. and Zucc.; Trochodendrospermum; Zizyphoides

Indexed keywords

TETRACENTRON SINENSE; TROCHODENDRON ARALIOIDES;

EID: 0031784029     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/anbo.1998.0679     Document Type: Article

References (164)

1. Bailey IW, Nast CG. 1945. Morphology and relationships of Trochodendron and Tetracentron. I. Stem, root, and leaf. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 26: 143-153.
2. Baillon HÉ. 1859. Monographie des Buxacées et des Stylocérées. Paris: V. Masson.
3. Barabé D, Bergeron Y, Vincent G. 1982. Etude quantitative de la classification des Hamamelididae. Taxon 31: 619-645.
4. Barabé D, Bergeron Y, Vincent G. 1987. La répartition des caractères dans la classification des Hamamelididae (Angiospermae). Canadian Journal of Botany 65: 1756-1767.
5. Baykovskaya TN, Kryshtofovich AN. 1966. [The Upper Cretaceous Flora of Tsagayan in Amur region]. In: Kryshtofovich AN. [Selected works]. Vol. 3. [Palaeobotanical monographs]. Moscow - Leningrad: Nauka, 184-320. (in Russian).
6. Berry EW. 1922. The flora of the Woodbine sand at Arthurs Bluff, Texas. United States Geological Survey. Professional Paper 129-G: 153-181.
7. Bhatnagar AK, Kapil RN. 1982. Seed development in Daphniphyllum himalayense with a discussion on taxonomic position of Daphniphyllaceae. Phytomorphology 32: 66-81.
8. Bretzler E. 1924. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Gattung Platanus. Botanisches Archiv 7: 388-417.
9. Brown RW. 1939. Fossil leaves, fruits and seeds of Cercidiphyllum. Journal of Paleontology 13: 485-499.
10. Černiakowskaya EF, Doweld AB. 1996. Davidsoniaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 5. St.-Petersburg: Mir et Semja, 14-16 (in Russian).
11. Chase MW et al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastic gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
12. Cordemoy CJ de. 1859. Note sur les ovules de deux genres de Dilléniacées. Bulletin de la Société Botanique de France 6: 409-411, 449-50.
13. Corner EJH. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons. Vols, 1, 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Crane PR. 1989. Paleobotanical evidence on the early radiation of nonmagnoliid dicotyledons. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 165-191.
15. Crane PR, Manchester SR, Dilcher DL. 1991. Reproductive and vegetative structure of Nordenskiöldia (Trochodendrales), a vesselless dicotyledon from the early Tertiary of the Northern Hemisphere. American Journal of Botany 78: 1311-1334.
16. Crane PR, Stockey RA. 1986. Morphology and development of pistillate inflorescences in extant and fossil Cercidiphyllaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 382-393.
17. Croizat L. 1947. Trochodendron, Tetracentron and their meaning in phylogeny. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 74: 60-76.
18. Croizat L. 1960. Principia botanica. Vols 1a, 1b. Caracas: The Author.
19. Cronquist A. 1968. The evolution and classification of flowering plants. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
20. Cronquist A. 1992. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. 2nd edn. New York: Columbia University Press.
21. Dahlgren G. 1989. An updated angiosperm classification. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 197-203.
22. Danilova MF, Plisko MA. 1991. Trochodendraceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 98-99 (in Russian).
23. Dickison WC. 1967a. Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae, I. Wood anatomy. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 48: 1-29.
24. Dickison WC. 1967b. Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae, II. The pollen. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 48: 231-240.
25. Dickison WC. 1968. Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae, III. The carpels. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 49: 317-332.
26. Dickison WC. 1969. Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae, IV. Anatomy of the node and vascularization of the leaf. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 50: 384-410.
27. Dickison WC. 1970. Comparative morphological studies in Dilleniaceae, VI. Stamens and young stem. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 51: 403-422.
28. Dickison WC, Nowicke JW, Skvarla JJ. 1982. Pollen morphology of the Dilleniaceae and Actinidiaceae. American Journal of Botany 69: 1055-1073.
29. Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA. 1989. Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and the relationships of Hamamelidae. In: Crane PR, Blackmore S, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 1. Introduction and 'lower' Hamamelidae. Systematics Association Special Volume 40A. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 17-45.
30. Doweld AB. 1996a. On the origin of the carpel as evidenced by its vascular skeleton. Phytomorphology 46: 387-394.
31. Doweld AB. 1996b. Sapindaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 5. St.-Petersburg: Mir et Semja, 317-339. (in Russian).
32. Doweld AB. 1996c. Hippocastanaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 5. St.-Petersburg: Mir et Semja, 343-346 (in Russian).
33. Doweld AB. 1996d. The carpology and taxonomic relationships of Bretschneidera (Bretschneideraceae). Acta Botanica Malacitana 21: 79-90.
34. Doweld AB. 1997a. Phermatology, a new name for the science of seeds. Taxon 46: 539-540.
35. Doweld AB. 1997b. [On the Russian (language) in Russian botany. II. New Russian and Latin terminology of the fruit dehiscence in flowering plants]. Naučno-Tekhničeskaya Terminologiya 1997(2): 113-125 (in Russian).
36. Doweld AB. 1998a. [On the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Medusagyne (Medusagynaceae) as evidenced by the structure of its fruits and seeds]. Botaničeskiy Žurnal (St.-Petersburg) 83(2): 54-68 (in Russian).
37. Doweld AB. 1998b. The carpology and taxonomic relationships of Davidsonia (Davidsoniaceae). Edinburgh Journal of Botany 55: 13-25.
38. Doweld AB. 1998c. On the morphological nature of the cupules of some Upper Devonian/Lower Carboniferous seed plants. Geophytology 26: 1-12.
39. Doweld AB, Sorokina EA. 1997. [A terminology of the principal types of the fruits in flowering plants]. Naučno-Tekhničeskaya Terminologiya 1997(1): 33-39 (in Russian).
40. Doyle JA, Donoghue MJ, Zimmer EA. 1994. Integration of morphological and ribosomal RNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 81: 419-450.
41. Eichler AW. 1865a. Nachtrag zu meinem Aufsatze in Nr. 29 des vorigen Jahrganges, betreffend die systematische Stellung von Trochodendron. Flora oder Allgemeine Botanische Zeitung 48: 12-15.
42. Eichler AW. 1865b. On the systematic position of the natural order Trochodendreae. Journal of Botany British and Foreign (Seeman) 3: 150-153.
43. Endress PK. 1967. Systematische Studie über die verwandschaftlichen Beziehung zwischen den Hamamelidaceen und Betulaceen. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 87: 431-525.
44. Endress PK. 1970. Die Infloreszenzen der apetalen Hamamelidaceen, ihre grundsätzliche morphologische und systematische Bedeutung. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 90: 1-54.
45. Endress PK. 1977. Evolutionary trends in the Hamamelidales - Fagales-group. Plant Systematics and Evolution, Supplement 1: 321-347.
46. Endress PK. 1978. Blütenontogenese, Blütenabgrenzung und systematische Stellung der perianthlosen Hamamelidoideae. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 100: 249-317.
47. Endress PK. 1986. Floral structure, systematics, and phylogeny in Trochodendrales. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 297-324.
48. Endress PK. 1989. Aspects of evolutionary differentiation of the Hamamelidaceae and the lower Hamamelididae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 193-211.
49. Fedotova TA. 1991. Bonnetiaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 205-208 (in Russian).
50. Foster AS. 1945. The foliar sclereids of Trochodendron aralioides Sieb. & Zucc. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 26: 155-162.
51. Gottwald H. 1977. The anatomy of the secondary xylem and the classification of ancient dicotyledons. Plant Systematics and Evolution, Supplement 1: 111-121.
52. Hallier H. 1901. Über die Verwandschaftverhältnisse der Ursprung der Sympetalen und Apetalen und die Anordnung der Angiospermen überhaupt. Vorstudien zum Entwurf eines Stammbaums der Blütenpflanzen. Abhandlungen aus dem Gebiete der Naturwissenschaften, herausgegeben vom Naturwissenschaftlichen Verein in Hamburg 16(2): 1-112.
53. Hallier H. 1903. Über den Umfang, die Gliederung und die Verwandschaft der Familie der Hamamelidaceen. Beihefte zum Botanisches Centralblatt 14: 247-260.
54. Hallier H. 1904. Über die Gattung Daphniphyllum, ein Übergangsglied von den Magnoliaceen und Hamamelidaceen zu den Kätzschenblüthlern. The Botanical Magazine, Tokyo 18: 55-69.
55. Hallier H. 1912. L'origine et le système phylétique des Angiospermes exposés à l'aide de leur arbre généalogique. Archives Néerlandaises des Sciences Exactes et Naturelles. Sér. 3B, Sciences Naturelles 1: 146-234.
56. Harms H. 1897. Über die Stellung der Gattung Tetracentron Oliv, und die Familie der Trochodendraceae. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 15: 350-360.
57. Harms H. 1916. Über die Blütenverhältnisse und die systematische Stellung der Gattung Cercidiphyllum Sieb, et Zucc. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 34: 272-283.
58. Harms H. 1918. Zur Kenntnis der Gattung Cercidiphyllum. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Dendrologischen Gesellschaft 45: 1-4.
59. Heer O. 1868. Flora Fossilis Arctica. I. Die fossile Flora der Polarlander. Zürich: Wurster.
60. Heer O. 1870. Die miocene Flora und Fauna Spitzbergens. Kungelige Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 8: 3-98.
61. Hergert HL, Phinney HK. 1954. Trochodendroxylon beckii gen. et sp. nov. from the Tertiary of Oregon. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 81: 118-122.
62. Hickey LJ, Wolfe J. 1975. The bases of angiosperm phylogeny: vegetative morphology. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 62: 538-589.
63. Hu H-H. 1950. A polyphyletic system of classification of angiosperms. Science Record (Peking) 3: 221-230.
64. Hufford LD. 1992. Rosidae and their relationships to other non-magnoliid dicotyledons: A phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 218-248.
65. Hufford LD, Crane PR. 1989. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the 'lower' Hamamelidae. In: Crane PR, Blackmore S, eds. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae. Vol. 1, Introduction and 'lower 'Hamamelidae. Systematics Association Special Volume 40A. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 175-192.
66. Hutchinson J. 1926. The families of flowering plants. I. Dicotyledons. Arranged according to a system based on their probable phytogeny. London: MacMillan & Co.
67. Iljinskaja IA. 1972. [The correction of the volume of the genus Trochodendroides and the new fossil species of Cocculus]. Botaničeskiy Žurnal (Moscow & Leningrad) 57: 17-30 (in Russian).
68. Iljinskaja IA. 1974. Trochodendrales; Trochodendroides Berry, Nordenskiöldia Heer, Nyssidium Heer. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Magnoliophyta Fossilia URSS. Vol. 4. Magnoliaceae - Eucommiaceae. Leningrad: Nauka, 112-124 (in Russian).
69. Jäger-Zürn I. 1966. Infloreszenz-und blütenmorphologische, sowie embryologische Untersuchungen an Myrothamnus Welw. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 42: 241-271.
70. Kaden NN. 1962. [On the schizocarpic fruits]. Botaničeskiy Žurnal (Moscow & Leningrad) 49: 966-973 (in Russian).
71. Korčagina IA. 1991a. Casuarinaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 128-129 (in Russian).
72. Korčagina IA. 1991b. Fagaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 130-133 (in Russian).
73. Korčagina IA. 1991c. Betulaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 134-140 (in Russian).
74. Krassilov VA. 1971. [New data on the structure and evolution of the reproductive organs of ancient angiosperms]. Doklady Akademii Nauk SSSR 196: 1449-1451 (in Russian).
75. Krassilov VA. 1973. Mesozoic plants and the problem of angiosperm ancestry. Lethaia 6: 163-178.
76. Krassilov VA. 1976. [Tsagayan flora of Amur region]. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
77. Krassilov VA, Fotyanova LI. 1996. New hamamelid fructification from the paleogene of Kamchatka, with comments on Trochodendro-carpus and Nordenskiöldia. Paleontological Journal 29: 87-95.
78. Kravzova TI. 1991a. Didymelaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 117 (in Russian).
79. Kravzova TI. 1991b. Stylocerataceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 124 (in Russian).
80. Kryshtofovich AN. 1958. [The fossil floras of the Penjin bay, lake Tastakh and Rarytkin range]. Trudy Botaničeskogo Instituta imeni V. L. Komarova Akademii Nauk SSSR. Ser. 8, Paleobotanika 3: 73-124 (in Russian).
81. Langdon LM. 1939. Ontogenetic and anatomical studies of the flower and fruits of the Fagaceae and Juglandaceae. The Botanical Gazette (Crawfordsville) 101: 301-327.
82. Leclerc du Sablon M. 1884. Recherches sur la déhiscence des fruits à péricarpe sec. Annales des Sciences Naturelles. Sér. 6, Botanique 18: 5-104.
83. Leroy J-F. 1955. Étude sur les Juglandaceae. A la recherche d'une conception morphologique de la fleur femelle et du fruit. Mémoires du Muséum National d;Histoire Naturelle, N.S., sér. B, Botanique 6: 1-246.
84. Leroy J-F. 1988a. L'organisation fondamentale d'une Angiosperme archaïque: Tetracentron (Tetracentracées). Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris. Sér. 3, Sciences de la Vie 306: 229-235.
85. Leroy J-F. 1988A. L'organisation fondamentale d'une Angiosperme archaïque: Trochodendron (Trochodendracées). Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, Paris. Sér. 3, Sciences de la Vie 306: 537-544.
86. Leroy J-F. 1993. Origine et évolution des plantes à fleurs: Les Nymphéas et le génie de la nature. Paris: Masson.
87. Lindley J. 1846. Vegetable kingdom : or, the structure, classification and uses of plants, illustrated upon the natural system. London: Bradbury & Evans.
88. Macdonald AD, Sattler R. 1973. Floral development of Myrica gale and the controversy over floral concepts. Canadian Journal of Botany 51: 1965-1976.
89. Mädler K. 1939. Die pliozäne Flora von Frankfurt am Main. Abhandlungen der Senckenbergischen naturforschungen Gesellschaft 446: 1-202.
90. Manchester SR, Crane PR, Dilcher DL. 1991. Nordenskiöldia and Trochodendron (Trochodendraceae) from the Miocene of northwestern North America. The Botanical Gazette (Crawfordsville) 152: 357-368.
91. Maximowicz CJ. 1872. Diagnoses breves plantarum novarum Japoniae et Mandshuriae. Decas decima. Bulletin de l' Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg 17: 142-189.
92. Melikian AP. 1969. [On the systematics of the orders Trochodendrales and Cercidiphyllales]. Molodoy Naučnyi Rabotnik. Ser. Estestvennye Nauki. Erevanskiy Gosudarstvennyi Universitet 2(10): 97-102 (in Russian).
93. Melikian AP. 1971. [The anatomical structure of the spermoderm of the representatives of the genera Liquidambar L. and Altingia Nor. relative to its systematics]. Biologičeskiy Žurnal Armenii 24: 50-55 (in Russian).
94. Melikian AP. 1972. [On the position of the genera Rhodoleia, Exbucklandia and Chunia in the system of the family Hamamelidaceae]. Biologičeskiy Žurnal Armenii 25: 40-45 (in Russian).
95. Melikian AP. 1973a. [The types of the seed coats in Hamamelidaceae and allied families relative to their systematic relationships]. Botaničeskiy Žurnal (Moscow & Leningrad) 58: 350-359 (in Russian).
96. Melikian AP. 1973e. [The comparative anatomy of the seed coats in Hamamelidales and allied orders relative to their systematics]. PhD Thesis, Erevan (in Russian).
97. Melikian AP. 1973c. [The anatomy of the seed coats and the systematics of the family Hamamelidaceae]. Biologičeskiy Žurnal Armenii 26: 104-105 (in Russian).
98. Melikian AP. 1991a. Tetracentraceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 100 (in Russian).
99. Melikian AP. 1991b. Hamamelidaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 105-107 (in Russian).
100. Melikian AP. 1991c. Platanaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 110-112 (in Russian).
101. Melikian AP. 1991d. Altingiaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 109-110 (in Russian).
102. Melikian AP. 1991e. Cercidiphyllaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 101 (in Russian).
103. Melikian AP. 1991f. Eucommiceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 104 (in Russian).
104. Melikian AP. 1991g. Rhodoleiceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 108 (in Russian).
105. Melikian AP, Bondar NA. 1996. Rosaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 5. St.-Petersburg: Mir et Semja, 102-123 (in Russian).
106. Melikian AP, Korčagina IA. 1991. Eupteleaceae. In : Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 102-103 (in Russian).
107. Melikian AP, Plisko MA. 1988. Magnoliaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 2. Leningrad: Nauka. 11-17 (in Russian).
108. Melville R. 1969. Studies on floral structure and evolution. I. The Magnoliales. Kew Bulletin 23: 133-180.
109. Mohana Rao PR. 1974. Seed anatomy in some Hamamelidaceae and phylogeny. Phytomorphology 24: 113-139.
110. Mohana Rao PR. 1983. Seed and fruit anatomy of Trochodendron aralioides. Phytomorphology 31: 18-23.
111. Nakai T. 1943. Ordines, familiae, tribi, genera, sectiones, species, varietates, formae et combinationes novae a Prof. Nakai-Takenoschin adhuc et novis edita. Appendix: Questiones characterium naturalium plantarum. Tokyo: Imperial University.
112. Nast CG, Bailey IW. 1945. Morphology and relationships of Trochodendron and Tetracentron, II. Inflorescence, flower, and fruit. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 26: 267-276.
113. Nast CG, Bailey IW. 1946. Morphology of Euptelea and comparison with Trochodendron. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 27: 186-192.
114. Nemirovič-Dančenko EN. 1991. Balanopaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 115-116 (in Russian).
115. Nemirovič-Dančenko EN. 1992. Thymelaeaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 4. St.-Petersburg: Nauka, 405-418 (in Russian).
116. Nemirovič-Dančenko EN. 1996. Greyiaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 5. St.-Petersburg: Mir et Semja, 79-82 (in Russian).
117. Netolitzky F. 1926. Anatomie der Angiospermen-Samen. In: Linsbauer K, ed. Handbuch der Pflanzenanatomie. II Abteilung, 2 Teil, Pteridophyten und Anthophyten. Bd. 10. Berlin: Gebrüder Borntraeger, 1-364.
118. Noronha F. 1790. Altingia excelsa; malaice et javanice Rasamala; Lignum papuanum Rumphii Herbar. Verhandelingen ran het Bataviaasch Genootschap van Kunsten en Wetenschappen 5: 1-20.
119. O'Brien TP, McCully ME. 1981. The study of plant structure : principles and selected methods. Melbourne: Termarcarphi and Pty. Ltd.
120. Oliver D. 1889. Tetracentron sinense Oliv. Hooker's Icones Plantarum; or, Figures with descriptive characters and remarks of new and rare plants, selected from the Kew Herbarium. Ser. 3. 9(19): 1892. London: Williams & Norgate.
121. Page VM. 1968. Angiosperm wood from the Upper Cretaceous of central California: Part II. American Journal of Botany 55: 168-172.
122. Pervukhina NV. 1963. [On the position of Trochodendron in the phylogenetic system of angiosperms]. Botaničeskiy Žurnal (Moscow & Leningrad) 48: 939-948 (in Russian).
123. Pervukhina NV, Yoffe MD. 1962. [Morphology of the flower of Trochodendron]. Botaničeskiy Žurnal (Moscow & Leningrad) 47: 1709-1730 (in Russian).
124. Praglowski J. 1974. The pollen morphology of the Trochodendraceae, Tetracentraceae, Cercidiphyllaceae, and Eupteleaceae with reference to taxonomy. Pollen and Spores 16: 449-467.
125. Petrova LR. 1991a. Daphniphyllaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 113-114 (in Russian).
126. Petrova LR. 1991b. Myrothamnaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 118 (in Russian).
127. Petrova LR. 1991c. Buxaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 119-123 (in Russian).
128. Petrova LR. 1991d. Simmondsiaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 125-127 (in Russian).
129. Prantl K. 1888. Trochodendraceae. In: Engler A, Prantl K, eds. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, III Teil, 2 Abteilung. Leipzig: W. Engelmann, 21-23.
130. Salisbury RA. 1807. The Paradisus Londinensis: containing plants cultivated in the vicinity of the Metropolis. Vol. 2(1). London: D. N. Shury.
131. Sastri RLN. 1958. Floral morphology and embryology of some Dilleniaceae. Botaniska Notiser (Lund) 111: 495-511.
132. Scott RA, Wheeler EA. 1982. Fossil woods from the Eocene Clarno Formation of Oregon. International Association of Wood Anatomists (I.A.W.A.) Bulletin, N.S. 3: 135-154.
133. Seeman B. 1864. Revision of the natural order of Hederaceae. Journal of Botany British and Foreign (Seeman) 2: 235-250, 289-309.
134. Siebold PF von. 1838 (1835). Flora japonica; sive, Plantae, quas in imperio japonico collegit, descripsit, ex parte in ipsis locis pingendas curavit dr. Ph. Fr. de Siebold. Sectio prima continens plantas ornatu vel usui inservientes. [Sect. 1]. Lugduni Batavorum: apud Auctorem.
135. Smith AC. 1945. A taxonomic review of Trochodendron and Tetracentron. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 26: 123-142.
136. Smith AC. 1972. An appraisal of the orders and families of primitive extant angiosperms. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 50A: 215-226.
137. Smith DL. 1964. Evolution of the ovule. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 39: 137-159.
138. Soepadmo E. 1968. A revision of the genus Quercus L. subgen. Cyclobalanopsis (Oersted) Schneider in Malesia. The Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 22: 355-427.
139. Soltis DE et al. 1997. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 84: 1-49.
140. Spjut RW. 1994. A systematic treatment of fruit types. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 70: 1-182.
141. Stopp K. 1950. Karpologische Studien I. Vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen über die Dehiszenzformen der Kapselfrüchte. Abhandlungen der mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Klasse, Akademie der Wissenschaften und Literatur. Mainz 1950(7): 165-210 (3-56).
142. Swamy BGL, Bailey IW. 1949. The morphology and relationships of Cercidiphyllum. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 30: 187-210.
143. Takhtajan AL. 1966. Systema et phylogenia Magnoliophytorum. Leningrad: Nauka (in Russian).
144. Takhtajan AL. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. New York : Columbia University Press.
145. Thorne RF. 1973. The 'Amentiferae' or Hamamelidae as an artificial group: a summary statement. Brittonia 25: 395-405.
146. Thorne RF. 1992. An updated phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365-389.
147. Tieghem PhÉL van. 1900. Sur les dicotylédones du groupe des Homoxylées. Journal de Botanique (Morot) 14: 259-297, 330-361.
148. Uemura K. 1988. Late Miocene floras of Northeast Honshu, Japan. Bulletin of the National Science Museum, Tokyo, Series C 14: 1-197.
149. Vakhrameyev VA. 1952. [Stratigraphy and fossil flora of the Cretaceous sediments in Western Kazakhstan]. In: Nalivkin DV, ed. [Regional stratigraphy of the USSR]. Vol. 1. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo Akademii Nauk SSSR, 1-340 (in Russian).
150. Vaughan JG. 1970. The structure and utilization of oil seeds. London: Chapman and Hall.
151. Vikhireva VV. 1957. -Myrica gale L. [Anatomical structure and development of the female flower in Myrica gale L.]. Trudy Botaničeskogo Instituta imeni V. L. Komarova AN SSSR. Ser. 7, Morfologiya i anatomiya rasteniy 4: 270-287.
152. Vyšenskaya TD. 1991a. Myricaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparative Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 141-148 (in Russian).
153. Vyšenskaya TD. 1991b. Rhoipteleaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 149-151 (in Russian).
154. Vyšenskaya TD. 1991c. Juglandaceae. In: Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia seminum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 152-162 (in Russian).
155. Vyšenskaya TD, Oganezova GG. 1991. Dilleniaceae. In Takhtajan AL, ed. Anatomia semimum comparativa. Vol. 3. Leningrad: Nauka, 163-171 (in Russian).
156. Walker JW. 1976. Evolutionary significance of the exine in the pollen of primitive angiosperms. In: Ferguson IK, Muller J, eds. The evolutionary significance of the exine. London: Academic Press, 251-308.
157. Weberbauer A. 1898. Beiträge zur Anatomie der Kapselfrüchte. Botanisches Centralblatt 73: 54-59, 81-105, 135-142, 161-168, 193-202, 250-257, 296-302.
158. Wilson CL. 1965. The floral anatomy of the Dilleniaceae. I. Hibbertia Andr. Phytomorphology 15: 248-274.
159. Wilson CL. 1973. The floral anatomy of the Dilleniaceae. II. Genera other than Hibbertia. Phytomorphology 23: 25-42.
160. Winkler H. 1936. Septizide Kapsel und Spaltfrucht. Beiträge zur Biologie der Pflanzen 24: 191-200.
161. Wunderlich R. 1967. Some remarks on the taxonomic significance of the seed coat. Phytomorphology 17: 301-311.
162. Yoffe MD. 1965. [On the embryology of Trochodendron aralioides Sieb. et Zucc. (Development of the embryo and endosperm)]. In: Yakovlev MS, ed. [Morphology of the flower and reproductive process in angiospermous plants]. (Moscow-) Leningrad: Nauka, 177-188 (in Russian).
163. Young DA. 1981. Are the angiosperms primitively vesselless? Systematic Botany 6: 313-330.
164. Zavada MS, Dilcher DL. 1986. Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 348-381.