Comparative infructescence morphology in Liquidambar (Altingiaceae) and its evolutionary significance

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 92, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1234-1255

  Ickert Bond, Stefanie M ^a,b   Pigg, Kathleen B ^b   Wen, Jun ^a,c  

^a FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Altingiaceae; Biogeography; Infructescence; Liquidambar; Phylogeny

Indexed keywords

PHYLOGENY;

ALTINGIA; ALTINGIACEAE; HAMAMELIDACEAE; HAMAMELIDIDAE; LIQUIDAMBAR; LIQUIDAMBAR ACALYCINA; LIQUIDAMBAR CHANGII; LIQUIDAMBAR FORMOSANA; LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA;

EID: 23044489271     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.92.8.1234     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENY GROUP (APG II). 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399-436.
2. ARCHIE, J. W. 1985. Methods for coding variable morphological features for numerical taxonomic analysis. Systematic Zoology 34: 326-345.
3. BLUME, C. L. 1828. Flora Javae. J. Frank, Brussels, Belgium.
4. BOGLE, A. L. 1986. The floral morphology and vascular anatomy of the Hamamelidaceae: subfamily Liquidambaroideae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 325-347.
5. BORATYNSKA, K. 1984. Distribution of Liquidambar orientalis Mill, on Rhodos Island. Arboretum Kornickie 29: 3-11.
6. CARLQUIST, S. 1982. The use of ethylene diamine in softening hard plant tissue for paraffin sectioning. Stain Technology 57: 311-317.
7. CHANG, K. T. 1959. The pollen morphology of Liquidambar L. and Altingia Nor. Botaneski Zhurnal 44: 1375-1380.
8. CHANG, H.-T. 1962. Semiliquidambar, novum Hamamelidacearum genus Sinicum. Sunyatsen University Bulletin of Natural Science 1: 34-44.
9. CHANG, H.-T. 1973. A revision of the Hamamelidaceous flora of China. Bulletin of Sun-Yatsen University 1: 54-71.
10. CHANG, H.-T. 1979. Hamamelidaceae. In H.-T. Chang [ed.], Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, vol. 35 (2), 36-116. Science Press, Beijing, China.
11. CHANG, T.-T. 1964. Pollen morphology of Hamamelidaceae and Altingiaceae. Acta Insituti Botanici Nomine V. L. Komarovii Academiae Scientiarum Unionis Rerum Publicarum Sovieticarum Socialisticarum, series 1, Flora et Systematica Plantae Vasculares 13: 173-232.
12. CHASE, M. K., D. E. SOLTIS, R. G. OLMSTEAD, D. MORGAN, D. H. LES, B. R. MISCHLER, M. R. DUVALL, R. A. PRICE, H. G. HILLIS, Y.-L. QIU, K. A. KRON, J. H. RETTIG, E. CONTI, J. D. PALMER, J. R. MANHART, K. J. SYTSMA, H. J. MICHAELS, W. J. KRESS, K. G. KAROL, W. D. CLARK, M. HEDRÉN, B. S. GAUT, R. K. JANSEN, K.-J. KIM, C. F. WIMPEE, J. F. SMITH, G. R. FURNIE, S. H. STRAUSS, Q.-Y. XIANG, G. M. PLUNKETT, P. S. SOLTIS, S. M. SWENSEN, S. E. WILLIAMS, P. A. GADEK, C. J. QUINN, L. E. EQUIARTE, E. GOLENBERG, G. H. LEARN JR., S. W. GRAHAM, S. C. H. BARRETT, S. DAYANANDAN, AND V. A. ALBERT. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcL. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528-580.
13. CRONQUIST, A. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
14. DOWELD, A. B. 1998. Carpology, seed anatomy and taxonomic relationships of Tetracentron (Tetracentraceae) and Trochodendron (Trochodendraceae). Annals of Botany 82: 413-443.
15. EFE, A. 1987. Liquidambar orientalis Mill. (sigla agaci) in morfolojik ve palinolojik ozellikleri uzerine arastirmalar. [Studies on the morphological and palynological characteristics of Liquidambar orientalis Mill, in Turkey]. Istanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergesi, series A 37: 84-114.
16. ENDRESS, P. K. 1967. Systematische Studie über die verwandtschaftlichen Beziehungen zwischen den Hamameliaceen und Betulaceen. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 100: 249-317.
17. ENDRESS, P. K. 1989a. A suprageneric taxonomic classification of the Ha-mamelidaceae. Taxon 38: 371-376.
18. ENDRESS, P. K. 1989b. Aspects of evolutionary differentiation of the Hamamelidaceae and the lower Hamamelididae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 193-211.
19. ENDRESS, P. K. 1989c. Phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidoideae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, 227-248. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 40A, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
20. ENDRESS, P. K. 1993. Hamamelidaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2, 322-331. Springer-Verlag, New York. New York, USA.
21. ENDRESS, P. K., AND S. STUMPF. 1990. The diversity of stamen structures in 'Lower' Rosidae (Rosales, Fabales, Proteales, Sapindales). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 107: 217-293.
22. ENDRESS, P. K., AND A. IGERSHEIM. 1999. Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the basal eudicots. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 130: 305-393.
23. ESAU, K. 1965. Plant anatomy, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
24. FARRIS, J. S., M. KÄLLERSJÖ, A. G. KLUGE, AND C. BULT. 1995. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10: 315-319.
25. FELSENSTEIN, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783-791.
26. FERGUSON, D. K. 1989. A survey of the Liquidambaroideae (Hamamelidaceae) with a view to elucidating its fossil record. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, 249-272. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 40A, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
27. GIFFORD, E. M., AND A. S. FOSTER. 1989. Morphology and evolution of vascular plants. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York. USA.
28. GOLDBLATT, P., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 1977. Cytology and evolution in the Hamamelidaceae. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 58: 67-71.
29. GRAHAM, A. 1999. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of North American vegetation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
30. GREGOR, H.-J. 1978. Die Miozänen Frucht- und Samen-Floren der Oberpfälzer Braunkohle I. Funde aus den sandigen Zwischenmitteln. Palaeontographica 167B: 8-103.
31. GUILLAUMIN, A. 1920. Hamamelidacées. In H. Lecomte [ed.], Flore Genérale de l'Indochine, vol. 2. Masson et Cie, Paris, France.
32. HARMS, H. 1930. Hamamelidaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed. vol. 18a, 303-343. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
33. HOEY, M. T., AND C. R. PARKS. 1991. Isozyme divergence between eastern Asian, North American, and Turkish species of Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae). American Journal of Botany 78: 938-947.
34. HOEY, M. T., AND C. R. PARKS. 1994. Genetic divergence in Liquidambar styraciflua, L. formosana, and L. acalycina (Hamamelidaceae). Systematic Botany 19: 308-316.
35. HUELSENBECK, J. P., AND F. R. RONQUIST. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754-754.
36. HUFFORD, L. 1992. Rosidae and their relationships to other non-magnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 218-248.
37. HUFFORD, L., AND P. R. CRANE. 1989. A preliminary phylogenetic analysis of the 'lower' Hamamelidae. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, 175-192. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 40A, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
38. HUFFORD, L., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 1989. The diversity of anther structures and dehiscence patterns among Hamamelididae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 99: 301-346.
39. ICKERT-BOND, S. M., K. B. PIGG, AND J. WEN. 2004. Resolving phylogeny within the family Altingiaceae: implications from anatomy of infructescences and molecular data sets. Botany 2004, annual meeting of the Botanical Society of America, Snowbird, Utah, USA, abstract 690. Available at website, http://www.2004.botanyconference.org/engine/search/index.php?func= detail&aid=690.
40. JUDD, W. S., C. S. CAMPBELL, E. A. KELLOGG, P. F. STEVENS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2002. Plant systematics. A phylogenetic approach, 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
41. KALSHOVEN, G. E. 1937. The pest and blights of the Rasamala tree. Tectona 30: 162-176.
42. KAPLAN, D. R. 1984. The concept of homology and its central role in the elucidation of plant systematic relationships. In T. Duncan and T. F. Stuessy [eds.], Cladistics: perspectives on the reconstruction of evolutionary history, 51-70. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
43. KAUL, U., AND R. N. KAPIL. 1974. Exbucklandia populnea - from flower to fruit. Phytomophology 24: 217-228.
44. LI, J., A. L. BOGLE, AND A. S. KLEIN. 1997a. Interspecific relationships and genetic divergence of the disjunct genus Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae) inferred from DNA sequences of plastid gene matK. Rhodora 99: 229-240.
45. LI, J., A. L. BOGLE, AND A. S. KLEIN. 1997b. Phylogenetic relationships of the Hamamelidaceae inferred from sequences of internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA. American Journal of Botany 86: 1027-1037.
46. LI, J., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1999. More molecular evidence for interspecific relationships in Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae). Rhodora 101: 87-91.
47. LITTLE, E. L. 1971. Atlas of United States trees, vol. 1, Conifers and important hardwoods. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1146, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
48. LOBOVA, T. A., A. M. SCOTT, F. BLANCHARD, H. PECKHAM, AND P. CHARLES-DOMINIQUE. 2003. Cecropia as a food resource for bats in French Guiana and the significance of fruit structure in seed dispersal and longevity. American Journal of Botany 90: 388-403.
49. MADDISON, D. R., AND W. P. MADDISON. 2000. MacClade: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
50. MAGALLÓN, S., P. R. CRANE, AND P. S. HERENDEEN. 1999. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 297-372.
51. MAI, D. H. 1968. Zwei ausgestorbene Gattungen im Tertiär Europas und ihre Florengeschichtliche Bedeutung. Palaeontographica 123B: 184-199.
52. MEIKLE, R. D. 1977. Flora of Cyprus, vol. 1. Betham-Moxum Trust, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK.
53. MELIKIAN, A. P. 1971. The anatomical structure of the spermoderm of the representatives of the genera Liquidambar L. and Altingta Nor. relative to its systematics. Biologicheski Zhurnal Armenii 24: 50-55.
54. MELIKIAN, A. P. 1973. Seed coat types of Hamamelidaceae and allied families in relation to their systematics. Botaneski Zhurnal 58: 350-359.
55. MIONE, T., AND A. L. BOGLE. 1990. Comparative ontogeny of the inflorescence and flower of Hamamelis virginiana and Loropetalum chinense (Hamamelidaceae). American Journal of Botany 77: 77-91.
56. PARKS, C. R., AND J. F. WENDEL. 1990. Molecular divergence between Asian and North American species of Liriodendron (Magnoliaceae) with implications of fossil floras. American Journal of Botany 77: 1243-1256.
57. PIGG, K. B., S. M. ICKERT-BOND, AND J. WEN. 2004. Anatomically preserved Liquidambar (Altingiaceae) from the middle Miocene of Yakima Canyon, Washingon state, USA, and its biogeographic implications. American Journal of Botany 91: 499-509.
58. POSADA, D., AND K. A. CRANDALL. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
59. QUI, Y.-L., M. W. CHASE, AND C. R. PARKS. 1995. A chloroplast DNA phylogenetic study of the eastern Asia-eastern North America disjunct section Rytidospermum of Magnolia (Magnoliaceae). American Journal of Botany 82: 1582-1588.
60. QUI, Y.-L., M. CHASE, S. HOOT, E. CONTI, P. R. CRANE, K. J. SYTSMA, AND C. R. PARKS. 1998. Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 891-905.
61. RAO, R. P. M. 1974. Seed anatomy in some Hamamelidaceae and phylogeny. Phytomorphology 24: 113-139.
62. REICHINGER, K. H. 1943. Flora Aegaea. Flora der Inseln und Halbinseln des Ägäischen Meeres. Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. Denkschriften 105: 1-924.
63. REINSCH, A. 1890. Über die anatomischen Verhältnisse der Hamamelidaceae mit Rücksicht auf ihre systematische Gruppierungen. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik 11: 347-395.
64. SCHMITT, D. 1965. The pistillate inflorescence of sweet-gum (L. styraciflua). Silvae Genetica 15: 33-35.
65. SHI, S. Y., H.-T. CHANG, Y. CHEN, L. QU, AND J. WEN. 1998. Phylogeny of the Hamamelidaceae based on the ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Biochemical Syslematics and Ecology 26: 55-69.
66. SHI, S., Y. HUANG, Y. ZHONG, Y. DU, Q. ZHANG, H. CHANG, AND D. E. BOUFFORD. 2001. Phylogeny of the Altingiaceae based on cpDNA matK, PY-IGS and nrDNA ITS sequences. Plant Syslematics and Evolution 230: 13-24.
67. SHOEMAKER, D. N. 1905. On the development of Hamamelis virginiana. Botanical Gazette 39: 248-266.
68. SOLTIS, D. E., P. S. SOLTIS, M. W. CHASE, M. E. MORT, D. C. ALBACH, M. ZANIS, V. SAVOLAINEN, W. H. HAHN, S. B. HOOT, M. F. FAY, M. AXTELL, S. M. SWENSEN, L. M. PRINCE, W. J. KRESS, K. C. NIXON, AND J. S. FARRIS. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381-461.
69. SWOFFORD, D. I. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
70. TARDIEU-BLOT, M. L. 1965. Hamamelidaceae. In A. Aubréville and M. L. Tardieu-Blot [eds.], Flore du Cambodge du Laos et du Viêtnam, fascicle 4, 75-116. Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
71. TEMPLETON, A. R. 1983. Phylogenetic inference from restriction endonuclease cleavage site maps with particular reference to the evolution of humans and the apes. Evolution 37: 221-244.
72. TIFFNEY, B. H. 1986. Fruit and seed dispersal and the evolution of the Hamamelidae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 394-416.
73. TIFFNEY, B. H., AND S. R. MANCHESTER. 2001. The use of geological and paleontological evidence in evaluating plant phylogeographic hypotheses in the northern hemisphere Tertiary. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S3-S17.
74. TONG, K. 1930. Studien über die Familie der Hamamelidaceae, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Systematik und Entwicklungsgeschichte von Corylopsis. Bulletin of the Department of Biology Sun Yatsen University 2.
75. VINK, W. 1957. Hamamelidaceae. In C. G. G. J. van Steenis [ed.], Flora Malesiana, vol. 5, 363-379. Nationaal Herbarium Nederland, Universiteit Leiden branch, Leiden, Netherlands.
76. WEN, J. 1998. Evolution of the eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct pattern: insights from phylogenetic studies. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 28: 63-81.
77. WEN, J. 1999. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 421-455.
78. WEN, J. 2001. Evolution of eastern Asian-eastern North American biogeographic disjunctions: a few additional issues. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S117-S122.
79. WILLIAMS, J. 1855. Amentaceae. In J. H. Balfour [ed.], A manual of botany: being an introduction to the study of the structure, physiology, and classification of plants, 3rd ed., 524. Griffin, London, UK.
80. WILSON, P. 1905. Altingiaceae. In N. L. Britton and L. M. Underwood [eds.], North American flora, vol. 22, 189. New York Botanical Garden, New York, New York, USA.
81. WISNIEWSKI, M., AND A. L. BOGLE. 1982. The ontogeny of the inflorescence and flower of Liquidambar styraciflua L. (Hamamelidaceae). American Journal of Botany 69: 1612-1624.
82. WOOD, C. E. JR. 1972. Morphology and phytogeography: the classical approach to the study of disjunctions. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 59: 107-124.
83. ZHANG, Z.-Y., AND J. WEN. 1996. The seed morphology in Hamamelidaceae and its systematic evaluation. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 34: 538-546.
84. ZHANG, Z. Y., H. T. ZHANG, AND P. K. ENDRESS. 2003. Hamamelidaceae. In Z.-Y. WU, P. H. Raven, and D.-Y. Hong [eds.], Flora of China, vol. 9, 18-42. Science Press, Beijing, China.
85. ZHOU, Z.-K., W. L. CREPET, AND K. C. NIXON. 2001. The earliest fossil evidence of the Hamamelidaceae: Late Cretaceous (Turonian) inflorescences and fruits of Altingioideae. American Journal of Botany 88: 753-766.