Anatomically preserved Liquidambar (Altingiaceae) from the middle Miocene of Yakima Canyon, Washington state, USA, and its biogeographic implications

American Journal of Botany

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 499-509

  Pigg, Kathleen B ^a   Ickert Bond, Stefanie M ^a,b   Wen, Jun ^b,c  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Altingia; Altingiaceae; Biogeography; Fossil fruit; Infructescence; Liquidambar; Miocene; Silicification

Indexed keywords

BIOGEOGRAPHY;

ALTINGIA; ALTINGIACEAE; LIQUIDAMBAR; LIQUIDAMBAR ACALYCINA; LIQUIDAMBAR CHANGII; LIQUIDAMBAR STYRACIFLUA;

EID: 1642285288     PISSN: 00029122     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3732/ajb.91.3.499     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. AGARWAL, A. 1991. Occurrence of Altingia and Bauhinia in the Neyveli Lignite (Miocene), India. Journal of the Indian Botanical Society 70: 119-122.
2. BECK, G. F. 1945. Ancient forest trees of the sagebrush area in central Washington. Journal of Forestry 43: 334-338.
3. BOGLE, A. L. 1986. The floral morphology and vascular anatomy of the Hamamelidaceae: subfamily Liquidambaroideae. Annals of Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 325-347.
4. BOGLE, A. L., AND C. T. PHILBRICK. 1980. A generic atlas of hamamelidaceous pollens. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University 210: 29-103.
5. BORGARDT, S. J., AND K. B. PIGG. 1999. Anatomical and developmental study of petrified Quercus (Fagaceae) fruits from the Middle Miocene, Yakima Canyon, Washington, USA. American Journal of Botany 86: 307-325.
6. BROWN, R. W. 1962. Paleocene floras of the Rocky Mountains and Great Plains. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 375. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., USA.
7. CARLQUIST, S. 1982. The use of ethylene diamine in softening hard plant tissue for paraffin sectioning. Stain Technology 57: 311-317.
8. CHANEY, R. W., AND D. I. AXELROD. 1959. Miocene floras of the Columbia Plateau. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication 617: 1-237.
9. CHANG, C. T. 1958. The morphological characteristics of some recent and fossil pollen of Liquidambar, Altingia, Sycopsis, Euptelia, and Pistacia. Acta Botanica Sinica 7: 215-229. (In Chinese, Russian summary).
10. CHANG, C. T. 1959. The pollen morphology of Liquidambar L. and Altingia Nor. Botanicheskiǐ Zhurnal 44: 1375-1380. (In Russian with English summary).
11. CHANG, C. T. 1964. The pollen morphology of the families Hamamelidaceae and Altingiaceae. Trudy Botanicheskogo Instituta Akademii Nauk SSSR, Ser. 1, Flora i sistematika vysshikh rastenii 13: 173-232. (In Russian.)
12. CHANG, H.-T. 1962. Semiliquidambar, novum Hamamelidacearum genus sinicum. Sunyatsen University Bulletin of Natural Science 1: 34-44.
13. CHANG, H.-T. 1973. A revision of the Hamamelidaceous flora of China. Buletin of Sun-Yatsen University 1: 54-71.
14. CHANG, H.-T. 1979. Hamamelidaceae. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 35(2): 36-116.
15. CZECZOTT, H., AND A. SKIRGIELLO. 1959. Flora Kopalna Turowa Kola Bogatyni II (I) Dicotyledones. Prace Muzeum Ziemi 3: 93-112. (In Polish, English summary).
16. DONOGHUE, M. J., C. D. BELL, AND J. LI. 2001. Phylogenetic patterns in northern hemisphere plant geography. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162: S41-S52.
17. ENDO, S., AND H. MORITA. 1932. Notes on the genera Comptoniphyllum and Liquidambar. Scientific Reports of the Tohoku Imperial University, Series 2, 15: 41-53.
18. ENDRESS, P. K. 1989a. A suprageneric taxonomic classification of the Hamamelidaceae. Taxon 38: 371-376.
19. ENDRESS, P. K. 1989b. Aspects of evolutionary differentiation of the Hamamelidaceae and the Lower Hamamelididae. Plant Systematics and Evolution 162: 193-211.
20. ENDRESS, P. K. 1993. Hamamelidaceae. In K. Kubitzki [ed.], The families and genera of vascular plants, vol. 2, 322-331. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
21. ERNST, W. R. 1963. The genera of Hamamelidaceae and Platanaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 44: 193-210.
22. FERGUSON, D. K. 1971. The Miocene flora of Kreuzau, western Germany. I. The leaf-remains. North Holland Publishing, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
23. FERGUSON, D. K. 1989. A survey of the Liquidambaroideae (Hamamelidaceae) with a view to elucidating its fossil record. In P. R. Crane and S. Blackmore [eds.], Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1, 249-272. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 40A. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
24. FRIIS, E. M. 1985. Angiosperm fruits and seeds from the middle Miocene of Jutland (Denmark). Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Biologiske Skrifter 24(3): 1-185.
25. FRIIS, E. M., P. R. CRANE, AND K. R. PEDERSEN. 1988. Reproductive structures of Cretaceous Platanaceae. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab. Biologiske Skrifter 31: 1-56.
26. GRAHAM, A. 1965. The Sucker Creek and Trout Creek Miocene floras of southeastern Oregon. Kent State University Bulletin, Research Series IX, 53: 1-147.
27. GRAHAM, A. [ED.]. 1972. Floristics and paleofloristics of Asia and eastern North America. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
28. GRAHAM, A. K. 1999. Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic history of North American vegetation. Oxford University Press, New York, New York, USA.
29. GREGGUS, P. 1959. Holzanatomie der europäischen Laubhölzer und Sträucher. Académiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.
30. GREGOR, H.-J. 1978. Die Miozänen Frucht- und Samen-Floren der Oberpfälzer Braunkohle I. Funde aus den sandigen Zwischenmitteln. Palaeontographica 167B: 8-103.
31. HANTKE, R. 1954. Die fossile Flora der obermiozänan Oehninger-Fundstelle Schrotzburg (Schienerberg, Süd-Baden). Denkschriften der Schweizerischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 80: 27-118.
32. HARMS, H. 1930. Hamamelidaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl [eds.], Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, ed. 2nd. 18a, 303-343. Englemann, Leipzig, Germany.
33. HERENDEEN, P. S., S. MAGALLÓN-PUEBLA, R. LUPIA, P. R. CRANE, AND J. KOBYLINSKA. 1999. A preliminary conspectus of the Allon flora from the Late Cretaeous (Late Santonian) of central Georgia, U.S.A. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 407-471.
34. HOEY, M. T., AND C. R. PARKS. 1991. Isozyme divergence between eastern Asian, North American and Turkish species of Liquidambar. American Journal of Botany 79: 938-947.
35. HOEY, M. T., AND C. R. PARKS. 1994. Genetic divergence in Liquidambar styraciflua, L. formosana and L. acalycina (Hamamelidaceae). Systematic Botany 19: 308-316.
36. HOPKINS, D. M. [ED.]. 1967. The Bering land bridge. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA.
37. HUANG, G. L. 1986. Comparative anatomical studies of woods of Hamamelidaceae in China. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni 1: 22-28. (In Chinese with English abstract).
38. HUFFORD, L. 1992, Rosidae and their relationships to other nonmagnoliid dicotyledons: a phylogenetic analysis using morphological and chemical data. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 79: 218-248.
39. HUZIOKA, K., AND K. UEMURA. 1979. The Comptonia-Liquidambar forest during middle Miocene Daijima age in Japan. Report of the Research Institute of Underground Resources, Mining College, Akita University 45: 37-50.
40. IGERSHEIM, A., AND P. K. ENDRESS. 1998. Gynoecium diversity and systematics of the paleoherbs. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 127: 289-370.
41. JUDD, W. S., C. S. CAMPBELL, E. A. KELLOGG, P. F. STEVENS, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2002. Plant systematics. A phylogenetic approach, 2nd ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
42. KIRCHHEIMER, F. 1943. Über Steinhauera subglobosa Presl und die Reste von Liquidambar-Fruchtständen aus dem Tertiär Mitteleuropas. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Geologie, und Palaeontologie 1943 (B) 1: 216-236.
43. KIRCHHEIMER, F. 1957. Die Laubgewächse der Braunkohlenzeit. VEB Wilhelm Knapp Verlag, Halle, Germany.
44. KOCH, B. E., W. L. FRIEDRICH, E. F. CHRISTIENSEN, AND E. M. FRIIS. 1973. Den Miocæne brunkulsflora og dens geologiske milødi Soby-fasterholt området syd øst fur Herning. Dansk. geologische foren Årsskrift for 1972, 1-57.
45. KRASSILOV, V. A. 1976. The Tsagayan flora of Amur region. Nauka Press, Academic Sciences of USSR, Moscow, Russia. (In Russian).
46. KUPRIANOVA, L. A. 1960. Palynological data contributing to the history of Liquidambar. Pollen Spores 2: 71-88.
47. LANCUCKA-SRODONIOWA, M. 1966. Tortonian flora from the "Gdow Bay" in the south of Poland. Acta Palaeobotanica 7: 1-135.
48. LEE, S., AND J. WEN. 2001. A phylogenetic analysis of Prunus and the Amygdaloideae (Rosaceae) using ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. American Journal of Botany 88: 150-160.
49. LI, H. L. 1952. Floristic relationships between Eastern Asia and eastern North America. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 42: 371-429.
50. LI, H. M., AND L. J. HICKEY. 1988. Leaf architecture and systematics of the Hamelidaceae sensu lato. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 29: 481-493.
51. LI, J., A. L. BOGLE, AND A. S. KLEIN. 1997. Interspecific relationships and genetic divergence of the disjunct genus Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae) inferred from DNA sequences of plastid gene matK. Rhodora 99: 229-240.
52. LI, J., A. L. BOGLE, AND A. S. KLEIN. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships in the Hamamelidaceae: evidence from the nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene matK. Plant Systematics and Evolution 218: 205-219.
53. LI, J., A. L. BOGLE, A. S. KLEIN, AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 2000. Phylogeny and biogeography of Hamamelis (Hamamelidaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany 5: 171-178.
54. LI, J., C. C. DAVIS, M. J. DONOGHUE, S. KELLEY, AND P. DEL TREDICI. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Torreya (Taxaceae) inferred from sequences of the nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS region. Harvard Papers in Botany 6: 275-281.
55. LI, J., AND M. J. DONOGHUE. 1999. More molecular evidence for interspecific relationships in Liquidambar (Hamamelidacae). Rhodora 101: 87-91.
56. MACGINITIE, H. D. 1941. A Middle Eocene flora from the central Sierra Nevada. Publications of the Carnegie Institution, Washington 584: 1-178.
57. MAGALLÓN, S., P. R. CRANE, AND P. S. HERENDEEN. 1999. Phylogenetic pattern, diversity, and diversification of eudicots. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 297-372.
58. MAGALLÓN-PUEBLA, S., P. S. HERENDEEN, AND P. R. CRANE. 1997. Quadriplatanus georgianus gen. et sp. nov.: staminate and pistillate platanaceous flowers from the Late Cretaceous (Coniacian-Santonian) of Georgia, U.S.A. International Journal of Plant Sciences 158: 373-394.
59. MAI, D. H. 1968. Zwei ausgestorbene Gattungen im Tertiär Europas und ihre Florengeschichtliche Bedeutung. Palaeontographica 123B: 184-199.
60. MANCHESTER, S. R. 1986. Vegetative and reproductive morphology of an extinct plane tree (Platanaceae) from the Eocene of western North America. Botanical Gazette 147: 200-226.
61. MANCHESTER, S. R. 1987. The fossil history of Juglandaceae. Missouri Botanical Garden Monographs 21: 1-137.
62. MANCHESTER, S. R. 1999. Biogeographical relationships of North American Tertiary floras. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86: 472-522.
63. MARTINETTO, E. 1998. East Asian elements in the Plio-Pleistocene floras of Italy. In A. Zhang and W. Sugong [eds.], Proceedings of the International Symposium on Floristic Character Diversity of East Asian Plants, 71-87. Springer-Verlag. Berlin, Germany.
64. MASLOVA, N. P. 1995. Liquidambar L. from the Cenozoic eastern Asia. Paleontological Journal 29, 1A: 145-158.
65. MASLOVA, N. P., AND V. A. KRASSILOV. 1997. New hamamelid infructescences from the Paleocene of western Kamchatka, Russia. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 97: 67-78.
66. MELIKIAN, A. P. 1973. Seed coat types of Hamamelidaceae and allied families in relation to their systematics. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 58: 350-359.
67. METCALFE, C. R., AND L. CHALK. 1950. Anatomy of the dicotyledons. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK.
68. MEYER, H. W., AND S. R. MANCHESTER. 1997. The Oligocene Bridge Creek flora of the John Day Formation, Oregon. University of California Publications in Geological Science 141: 1-195.
69. MOHANA RAO, P. R. 1974. Seed anatomy in some Hamamelidaceae and phylogeny. Phytomorphology 24: 113-139.
70. MULLER, J. 1981. Fossil pollen records of extant angiosperms. Botanical Review 47: 1-142.
71. OLIVER, D. 1867. Liquidambar formosana Hance. Hooker's Icones plantarum, vol. 11: 14.
72. PAN, K.-Y., A. M. LU, AND J. WEN. 1990. Characters of leaf epidermis in Hamamelidaceae. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 28: 10-26.
73. PATTERSON, C. 1981. The development of the North American fish fauna -a problem of historical biogeography. In P. L. Forey [ed.], Chance, change and challenge, vol. 2, The evolving biosphere, 265-281. British Museum (Natural History) and Cambridge University Press, London, UK.
74. PIGG, K. B., AND R. A. STOCKEY. 1991. Platanaceous plants from the Paleocene of Alberta, Canada. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 70: 125-146.
75. PRAKASH, U. 1968. Miocene fossil woods from the Columbia Basalts of central Washington, III. Palaeontographica 122B: 183-200.
76. PRAKASH, U., AND E. S. BARGHOORN. 1961a. Miocene fossil woods from the Columbia Basalts of central Washington. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 42: 165-195.
77. PRAKASH, U., AND E. S. BARGHOORN. 1961b. Miocene fossil woods from the Columbia Basalts of central Washington. II. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 42: 347-362.
78. PRESL, C. B. 1838. In G. C. Sternberg [ed.], Versuch einer geognostischbotanischen Darstellung der Flora der Vorwelt, vol. 2, pt. 7, 8, p. 202. Tentamen, Leipzig, Germany.
79. Qui, Y. M. W. CHASE, S. B. HOOT, E. CONTI, P. R. CRANE, K. J. SYTSMA, AND C. R. PARKS. 1998. Phylogenetics of the Hamamelidae and their allies: parsimony analyses of nucleotide sequences of the plastid gene rbcL. International Journal of Plant Sciences 159: 891-905.
80. RAO, K. R., AND S. K. PURKAYASTHA. 1972. Indian woods. Their identification, properties and uses, vol. 3. Forest Research Institute, Dehra Dun, India.
81. REMBER, W. C. 1991. Stratigraphy and paleobotany of Miocene lake sediments near Clarkia, Idaho. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho, USA.
82. SHI, S., H. T. CHANG, Y. CHEN, L. QU, AND J. WEN. 1998. Phylogeny of the Hamamelidaceae based on the ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 26: 55-69.
83. SHI, S., Y. HUANG, Y. ZHONG, Y. DU, Q. ZHANG, H. CHANG, AND D. E. BOUFFORD. 2001. Phylogeny of the Altingiaceae based on cpDNA matK, PY-IGS and nrDNA ITS sequences. Plant Systematics and Evolution 230: 13-24.
84. SMILEY, C. J. 1963. The Ellensburg flora of Washington. University of California Publications in Geological Science 35: 159-275.
85. SMILEY, C. J., AND W. C. REMBER. 1985. Composition of the Miocene Clarkia flora. In C. J. Smiley [ed]., Late Cenozoic history of the Pacific Northwest, 95-112. Pacific Division, American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco, California, USA.
86. SUZUKI, K. 1961. The important and characteristic Pliocene and Miocene species of plants from the southern parts of the Tohoku District, Japan. Science Reports of the Faculty of Arts and Science, Fukushima University 10: 1-95.
87. TAKAHASHI, K. 1964. Sporen und Pollen der oberkretazeischen Hakobuchi-Schichtengruppe, Hokkaido. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science Kyushu University, Series D, Geology 14: 159-271.
88. TIFFNEY, B. H. 1985a. Perspectives on the origin of the floristic similarity between eastern Asia and eastern North America. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 73-94.
89. TIFFNEY, B. H. 1985b. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the northern hemisphere. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 66: 243-273.
90. TONG, K. 1930. Studien über die Familie der Hamelidaceae, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Systematik und Entwicklungsgeschichte von Corylopsis. Bulletin of the Department of Biology, Sun Yat-Sen University 2.
91. UEMURA, K. 1983. Late Neogene Liquidambar (Hamamelidaceae) from the southern part of northeast Honshu, Japan. Memoirs of the National Science Museum of Tokyo 16: 25-36.
92. VAN DER BURGH, J. 1964. Hölzer der niederrheinischen Braunkohlenformation, 1. Hölzer der braunkohlengruben "Anna" zu Haanrade (Niederländisch Limburg). Acta Botanica Neerlandica 13: 250-301.
93. WEHR, W. C. 1995. Early Tertiary flowers, fruits and seeds of Washington state and adjacent areas. Washington Geology 23: 3-16.
94. WEN, J. 1998. Evolution of the eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct pattern: insights from phylogenetic studies. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 28: 63-81.
95. WEN, J. 1999. Evolution of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct distributions in flowering plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30: 421-455.
96. WEN, J., R. K. JANSEN, AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships and DNA sequence divergence of eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct plants. In M. Nei and N. Takahata [eds.], Current topics on molecular evolution, 37-44. Pennsylvania State University (University Park, Pennsylvania, USA) and the Graduate University for Advanced Studies, Hayama, Japan.
97. WEN, J., P. P. LOWRYII, J. WALCK, AND K. YOO. 2002. Phylogenetic and biogeographic diversifications of Osmorhiza (Apiaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89: 414-428.
98. WEN, J., AND S. SHI. 1999. A phylogenetic and biogeographic study of Hamamelis (Hamamelidaceae), an eastern Asian and eastern North American disjunct genus. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 27: 55-66.
99. WEN, J., S. SHI, R. K. JANSEN, AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1998. Phylogeny and biogeography of Aralia sect. Aralia (Araliaceae). American Journal of Botany 85: 866-875.
100. WEN, J., AND E. A. ZIMMER. 1996. Phylogeny and biogeography of Panax L. (the ginseng genus, Araliaceae): inference from ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 6: 167-177.
101. WISNIEWSKI, M., AND A. L. BOGLE. 1982. The ontogeny of the inflorescence and flower of Liquidambar styraciflua L. (Hamamelidaceae). American Journal of Botany 69: 1612-1624.
102. WOLFE, J. A. 1973. Fossil forms of the Amentiferae. Brittonia 25: 334-355.
103. WOLFE, J. A. 1981. Vicariance biogeography of angiosperms in relation to paleobotanical data. In G. Nelson and D. E. Rosen [eds.], Vicariance biogeography, 413-427. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
104. WOOD, C. E., JR. 1970. Some floristic relationships between the southern Appalachians and western North America. In P. C. Holt [ed.], The distributional history of the biota of the southern Appalachians, part II: flora. Research Division Monograph 2, 331-404. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, USA.
105. ZAVADA, M. S., AND D. L. DILCHER. 1989. Comparative pollen morphology and its relationship to phylogeny of pollen in the Hamamelidae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 73: 348-381.
106. ZHANG, Z.-Y., AND J. WEN. 1996. The seed morphology in Hamamelidaceae and its systematic evaluation. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica 34: 538-546.
107. ZHANG, Z.-Y., H.-T. ZHANG, AND P. K. ENDRESS. 2003. Hamamelidaceae. In Z.-Y. Wu, P. H. Raven, and D.-Y. Hong [eds.], Flora of China, vol. 9, 18-42. Science Press, Beijing, China.
108. ZHOU, Z., W. L. CREPET, AND K. C. NIXON. 2001. The earliest fossil record of the Hamamelidaceae: Late Cretaceous (Turonian) inflorescences and fruits of Altingioideae. American Journal of Botany 88: 753-766.