Learning is impaired by activated intentions

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 101-106

  Cook, Gabriel I ^a   Marsh, Richard L ^b   Clark Foos, Arlo ^b   Thadeus Meeks, J ^b  

^a CLAREMONT MCKENNA COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; RECALL; TIME PERCEPTION;

ATTENTION; CUES; HUMANS; INTENTION; MENTAL RECALL; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION; VERBAL LEARNING;

EID: 34447315315     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194035     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BOWER, G. H., & MANN, T. (1992). Improving recall by recoding interfering material at the time of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1310-1320.
2. EBBINGHAUS, H. (1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Teachers College Press. Reprinted Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999.
3. EINSTEIN, G. O., MCDANIEL, M. A., RICHARDSON, S. L., GUYNN, M. J., & CUNFER, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 996-1007.
4. EINSTEIN, G. O., MCDANIEL, M. A., THOMAS, R., MAYFIELD, S., SHANK, H., MORRISETTE, N., & BRENEISER, J. (2005). Multiple processes hi prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327-342.
5. GUYNN, M. I. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring hi event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 245-256.
6. HENRY, J. D., MACLEOD, M. S., PHILLIPS, L. H., & CRAWFORD, J. R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychology & Aging, 19, 27-39.
7. HICKS, I. L., MARSH, R. L., & COOK, G. I. (2005). Task interference hi time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 430-444.
8. KLIECEL, M., MARTIN, M., MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (2004). Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Memory, 12, 553-561.
9. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
10. MARSH, R. L., COOK, G. I., & HICKS, J. L. (2006). Task interference from event-based intentions can be material specific. Memory A Cognition, 34, 1636-1643.
11. MARSH, R. L., HANCOCK, T. W., & HICKS, J. L. (2002). The demands of an ongoing activity influence the success of event-based prospective memory. Psychonomic Bulletin A Review, 9, 604-610.
12. MARSH, R. L., & HICKS, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 336-349.
13. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & COOK, G. I. (2005). On the relationship between effort toward an ongoing task and cue detection in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 68-75.
14. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & COOK, G. I. (2006). Task interference from prospective memories covaries with contextual associations of fulfilling them. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1037-1045.
15. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., COOK, G. I., HANSEN, J. S., & PALLOS, A. L. (2003). Interference to ongoing activities covaries with the characteristics of an event-based intention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 29, 861-870.
16. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & LANDAU, J. D. (1998). An investigation of everyday prospective memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 633-643.
17. MARSH, R. L., HICKS, J. L., & WATSON, V. (2002). The dynamics of intention retrieval and coordination of action in event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 652-659.
18. MAYLOR, E. A. (1998). Changes in event-based prospective memory across adulthood. Aging, Neuropsychology, & Cognition, 5, 107-128.
19. MAYLOR, E. A., SMITH, G., DELLA SALA, S., & LOOM, R. H. (2002). Prospective and retrospective memory in normal aging and dementia: An experimental study. Memory & Cognition, 30, 871-884.
20. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23-41.
21. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127-S144.
22. MCDANIEL, M. A., GUYNN, M. J., EINSTEIN, G. O., & BRENEISER, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 605-614.
23. MCDANIEL, M. A., ROBINSON-RIEGLER, B., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1998). Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes? Memory & Cognition, 26, 121-134.
24. SMITH, R. E. (2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, A Cognition, 29, 347-361.
25. SMITH, R. E., & BAYEN, U. (2004). A multinomial model of prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 756-777.
26. SMITH, R. E., & BAYEN, U. (2006). The source of adult age differences in event-based prospective memory: A multinomial modeling approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 623-635.
27. WEST, R., & KROMPINGER, J. (2005). Neural correlates of prospective and retrospective memory. Neuropsychologia, 43, 418-433.