Prospective remembering: Perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes?

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 121-134

  McDaniel, Mark A ^a   Robinson Riegler, Bridget ^b   Einstein, Gilles O ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^b AUGSBURG COLLEGE   (United States)

^c FURMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; RECALL; SEMANTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0031890978     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03211375     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. ANDERSON, J. R., & REDER, L. M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 385-404). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. BATTIG, W. F., & MONTAGUE, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology Monographs, 80 (No. 3, Pt. 2).
3. BLAXTON, T. A. (1989). Investigating dissociations among memory measures: Support for a transfer appropriate processing framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 657-668.
4. BLAXTON, T. A. (1992). Dissociations among memory measures in memory-impaired subjects: Evidence for a processing account of memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 549-562.
5. BRANDIMONTE, M., EINSTEIN, G. O., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (EDS.) (1996). Prospective memory: Theory and applications. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. BROWN, A. S., NEBLETT, D. R., JONES, T. C., & MITCHELL, D. B. (1991). Transfer of processing in repetition priming: Some inappropriate findings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 514-525.
7. CHALLIS, B. H., & BRODBECK, D. R. (1992). Level of processing affects priming in word fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 595-607.
8. CRAIK, F. I. M., GOVONI, R., NAVEH-BENJAMIN, M., & ANDERSON, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159-180.
9. DONALDSON, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275-277.
10. EBBINGHAUS, H. (1964). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology (H. A. Ruger & C. E. Bussenius, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1885; translated 1913).
11. EICH, E. (1985). Context, memory, and integrated item/context imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 764-770.
12. EINSTEIN, G. O., HOLLAND, L. J., MCDANIEL, M. A., & GUYNN, M. J. (1992). Age related deficits in prospective memory: The influence of task complexity. Psychology & Aging, 7, 471-478.
13. EINSTEIN, G. O., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 6, 717-726.
14. EINSTEIN, G. O., & MCDANIEL, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory & applications (pp. 115-142). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. EINSTEIN, G. O., MCDANIEL, M. A., RICHARDSON, S. L., GUYNN, M. J., & CUNFER, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 996-1007.
16. GICK, M. L., CRAIK, F. I. M., & MORRIS, R. G. (1988). Task complexity and age differences in working memory. Memory & Cognition, 16, 353-361.
17. GODDEN, D. R., & BADDELEY, A. D. (1980). When does context influence recognition memory? British Journal of Psychology, 71, 99-104.
18. GOLDSTEIN, E., SCHMITT, J. C., & SHEIRER, C. J. (1978). Semantic effects in encoding specificity: A levels of processing approach. Memory & Cognition, 6, 13-19.
19. GUYNN, M. J., MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (in press). Remembering to perform actions: A different type of remembering? In H. D. Zimmer & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Memory for action: A distinct form of episodic remembering? New York: Oxford University Press.
20. HAMANN, S. B., & SQUIRE, L. R. (1996). Level-of-processing effects in word-completion priming: A neuropsychological study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 933-947.
21. HUNT, R. R., & ELLIS, H. C. (1974). Recognition memory and degree of semantic contextual change. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 1153-1159.
22. JACOBY, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
23. JACOBY, E. L. (1984). Incidental versus intentional retrieval: Remembering and awareness as separate issues. In N. Butters & L. Squire (Eds.), The neuropsychology of memory (pp. 97-122). New York: Guilford.
24. JACOBY, L. E., WOLOSHYN, B., & KELLEY, C. M. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
25. LIGHT, L. L., & CARTER-SOBELL, E. (1970). Effects of changed semantic context on recognition memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 9, 1-11.
26. MANDLER, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgement of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
27. MASSON, M. E. J., & FREEDMAN, L. (1990). Fluent identification of repeated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 355-373.
28. MASSON, M. E. J., & MACLEOD, C. M. (1992). Re-enacting the route to interpretation: Enhanced perceptual identification without prior perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 145-176.
29. MATTHEWS, T. D. (1992). Are retrospective and prospective memory related? Unpublished master's thesis, University of North Carolina, Greensboro.
30. MCDANIEL, M. A. (1995). Prospective memory: Progress and processes. In D. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 33, pp. 191-221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
31. MCDANIEL, M. A., ANDERSON, D. C., EINSTEIN, G. O., & O'HALLORAN, C. M. (1989). Modulation of environmental reinstatement effects through encoding strategies. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 523-548.
32. MCDANIEL, M. A., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23-41.
33. MCDANIEL, M. A., FRIEDMAN, A., & BOURNE, L. E. (1978). Remembering the levels of information in words. Memory & Cognition, 6, 156-164.
34. MCDERMOTT, K. B., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1996). Exact and conceptual repetition dissociate conceptual memory tests: Problems for transfer appropriate processing theory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 57-71.
35. MORRIS, C. D., BRANSFORD, J. P., & FRANKS, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
36. MOSCOVITCH, M. (1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems 1994 (pp. 269-310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. NELSON, D. L. (1979). Remembering pictures and words: Appearance, significance, and name. In L. S. Cermak & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 45-76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. PAIVIO, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Oxford University Press.
39. PAIVIO, A., & CSAPO, K. (1973). Picture superiority in free recall: Imagery or dual coding? Cognitive Psychology, 5, 176-206.
40. ROBINSON, M. B. (1992). Contextual effects in prospective memory. Unpublished master's thesis, Purdue University.
41. ROBINSON-RIEGLER, M. B. (1994). The recognition-recall hypothesis of prospective memory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
42. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & BLAXTON, T. A. (1987). Retrieval modes produce dissociations in memory for surface information. In D. Gorfein & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), Memory and cognitive processes: The Ebbinghaus Centennial Conference (pp. 349-379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
43. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, WELDON, M. S., & CHALLIS, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, WELDON, M. S., STADLER, M. L., & RIEGLER, G. L. (1992). Direct comparison of two implicit memory tests: Word fragment and word stem completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 18, 1251-1269.
45. SHEPARD, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 156-163.
46. SMITH, M. C., & MAGEE, L. E. (1980). Tracing the time course of picture-word processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 109, 373-392.
47. SMITH, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. M. Davies & D. M. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13-33). New York: Wiley.
48. SMITH, S. M., GLENBERG, A., & BJORK, R. A. (1978). Environmental context and human memory. Memory & Cognition, 6, 342-353.
49. TOGLIA, M. P., & BATTIG, W. F. (1978). Handbook of semantic word norms. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. TULVING, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
51. WELDON, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 526-541.
52. WELDON, M. S., & COYOTE, K. C. (1996). Failure to find the picture superiority effect in implicit conceptual memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 670-686.
53. WELDON, M. S., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1987). Altering retrieval demands reverses the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 15, 269-280.
54. WELDON, M. S., ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & CHALLIS, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 95-105.