Sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group

Zoology

Volumn 109, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 318-330

  Huey, Raymond B ^a   Moreteau, Brigitte ^b   Moreteau, Jean Claude ^c   Gibert, Patricia ^d   Gilchrist, George W ^e   Ives, Anthony R ^f   Garland Jr , Theodore ^g   David, Jean R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^e The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Comparative method; Female male ratio; Rensch's rule; Thorax length; Wing length

Indexed keywords

DROSOPHILA OBSCURA; OBSCURA GROUP;

EID: 33750015730     PISSN: 09442006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2006.04.003     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Andersson M. Sexual Selection (1994), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
2. Ashburner M., Golic K.G., and Hawley R.S. Drosophila, a Laboratory Handbook. second ed (2005), Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
3. Blomberg S.P., Garland Jr. T., and Ives A.R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57 (2003) 714-745
4. Cabrera V.M., Gonzalez A.M., Larruga J.M., and Gullon A. Genetic distance and evolutionary relationships in the Drosophila obscura group. Evolution 37 (1983) 675-689
5. Cardillo M. The life-history basis of latitudinal diversity gradients: how do species traits vary from the poles to the equator?. J. Anim. Ecol. 71 (2002) 79-87
6. Cox R.M., Skelly S.L., and John-Alder H.B. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution 57 (2003) 1653-1669
7. Cox R.M., Skelly S.L., and John-Alder H.B. Testosterone inhibits growth in juvenile male Eastern Fence lizards (Sceloporus undulatus): implications for energy allocation and sexual size dimorphism. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 78 (2006) 531-545
8. Darwin C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex vol. 2 (1871), John Murray, London
9. David J., and Clavel M.-F. Interaction entre le génotype et le milieu d'élevage. Conséquences sur les caractéristiques du développement de la Drosophile. Bull. Biol. France Belgique 99 (1965) 369-378
10. David J.R., Moreteau B., Gauthier J.P., Pétavy G., Stockel J., and Imasheva A. Reaction norms of size characters in relation to growth temperature in Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale line analysis. Genet. Sel. Evol. 26 (1994) 229-251
11. David J.R., Gibert P., Mignon-Grasteau S., Legout H., Pétavy G., Beaumont C., and Moreteau B. Genetic variability of sexual size dimorphism in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster: an isofemale line approach. J. Genet. 82 (2003) 101-110
12. David, J.R., Araripe, L.O., Bitner-Mathé, B.C., Capy, P., Goni, B., Klaczko, L.B., Legout, H., Martins, M.B., Vouidibio, J., Yassin, A., Moreteau, B., 2006. Sexual dimorphism of body size and sternopleural bristle number: a comparison of geographic populations of an invasive cosmopolitan drosophilid. Genetica, in press.
13. Fairbairn D. Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28 (1997) 659-687
14. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125 (1985) 1-15
15. Freckleton R.P., Harvey P.H., and Pagel M. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160 (2002) 712-726
16. Garland Jr. T., and Adolph S.C. Physiological differentiation of vertebrate populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22 (1991) 193-228
17. Garland Jr. T. Rate tests for phenotypic evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Am. Nat. 140 (1992) 509-519
18. Garland Jr. T., Harvey P.H., and Ives A.R. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41 (1992) 18-32
19. Garland Jr. T., Dickerman A.W., Janis C.M., and Jones J.A. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42 (1993) 265-292
20. Garland Jr. T., Midford P.E., and Ives A.R. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am. Zool. 39 (1999) 374-388
21. Garland Jr. T., Ives A.R., and Midford P.E. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Integ. Comp. Biol. 44 (2004) 556 (abstract)
22. Garland Jr. T., Bennett A.F., and Rezende E.L. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 208 (2005) 3015-3035
23. Gibert P., and Huey R.B. Chill-coma temperature in Drosophila: effects of development temperature, latitude, and phylogeny. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 74 (2001) 429-434
24. Gibert P., Moreteau B., Pla E., Petavy G., Karan D., and David J.R. Chill-coma tolerance, a major climatic adaptation among Drosophila species. Evolution 55 (2001) 1063-1068
25. Ihaka R., and Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J. Comp. Graph. Stat. 9 (1996) 299-314
26. Ives, A.R., Midford, P.E., Garland Jr., T., in preparation. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Syst. Biol.
27. Karan D., Morin J.P., Gravot E., Moreteau B., and David J.R. Body size reaction norms in Drosophila melanogaster: temporal stability and genetic architecture in a natural population. Genet. Selection Evol. 31 (1999) 491-508
28. Karan D., Dubey S., Moreteau B., Parkash R., and David J.R. Geographical clines for quantitative traits in natural populations of a tropical drosophilid: Zaprionus indianus. Genetica 108 (2000) 91-100
29. Kopp A., Duncan I., Godt D., and Carroll S.B. Genetic control and evolution of sexually dimorphic characters in Drosophila. Nature 410 (2001) 611
30. Llopart A., Elwyn S., and Coyne J.A. Pigmentation and mate choice in Drosophila. Nature 408 (2000) 553-559
31. Lovich J.E., and Gibbons J.W. A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. Growth Dev. Aging 56 (1992) 181-269
32. Matos M., Avelar T., and Rose M.R. Variation in the rate of convergent evolution: adaptation to a laboratory environment in Drosophila subobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 15 (2002) 673-682
33. Moreteau B., Morin J.-P., Gibert P., Petavy G., Pla E., and David J.R. Evolutionary changes of nonlinear reaction norms according to thermal adaptation: a comparison of two Drosophila species. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 320 (1997) 833-841
34. Moreteau B., Gibert P., Pétavy G., Moreteau J.-C., Huey R.B., and David J.R. Morphometrical evolution in a Drosophila clade: the Drosophila obscura group. J. Zool. Syst. Evol. Res. 41 (2003) 64-71
35. O'Grady P.M. Reevaluation of phylogeny in the Drosophila obscura species group based on combined analysis of nucleotide sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 12 (1999) 124-139
36. Pagel M. A method for the analysis of comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 156 (1992) 431-442
37. Pitnick S., Markow T.A., and Spicer G.S. Delayed male maturity is a cost of producing large sperm in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92 (1995) 10614-10618
38. Powell J.R. Progress and Prospects in Evolutionary Biology. The Drosophila Model (1997), Oxford University Press, New York, NY
39. Ranta E., Laurila A., and Elmberg J. Reinventing the wheel: analysis of sexual dimorphism in body size. Oikos 70 (1994) 313-321
40. Rayner J.M.V. Linear relations in biomechanics: the statistics of scaling functions. J. Zool. London A 206 (1985) 415-439
41. Reeve J.P., and Fairbairn D.J. Change in sexual size dimorphism as a correlated response to selection on fecundity. Heredity 83 (1999) 697-706
42. Renard E. Evolution de la famille amylase chez les drosophiles du groupe obscura: caractérisation du nouveau gène Amyrel (2000), Université François Rabelais, Tours, France
43. Rensch B. Evolution Above the Species Level (1960), Columbia University Press, New York
44. Rezende E.L., Bozinovic F., and Garland Jr. T. Climatic adaptation and the evolution of basal and maximum rates of metabolism in rodents. Evolution 58 (2004) 1361-1374
45. Schoener T.W. The ecological significance of sexual dimorphism in size in the lizard Anolis conspersus. Science 155 (1967) 474-477
46. Shine R. Sexual size dimorphism and male combat in snakes. Oecologia 33 (1978) 269-278
47. Smith R.J., and Cheverud J.M. Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body mass: a phylogenetic analysis of Rensch's Rule in primates. Int. J. Primatol. 23 (2002) 1095-1135
48. Sokal R.R., and Rohlf F.J. Biometry. third ed (1995), W.H. Freeman and Company, New York