Comparing phylogenetic signal in intraspecific and interspecific body size datasets

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1157-1161

  Ashton, K G ^a,b  

^a ARCHBOLD BIOLOGICAL STATION   (United States)

^b KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Body size; Interspecific; Intraspecific; Phylogenetic comparative methods; Phylogenetic signal

Indexed keywords

BODY SIZE; PHYLOGENETICS;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY SIZE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SAMPLE SIZE; SPECIES DIFFERENCE;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; SAMPLE SIZE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 4444330545     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2004.00764.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ashton, K.G. 2001. Body size variation among mainland populations of the western rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis). Evolution 55: 2523-2533.
2. Ashton, K.G. & de Queiroz, A. 2001. Molecular systematics of the western rattlesnake, Crotalus viridis (Viperidae), with comments on the utility of the D-loop in phylogenetic studies of snakes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 21: 176-189.
3. Avise, J.C. 1994. Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Chapman & Hall, New York.
4. Avise, J.C. 2000. Phylogeography: the History and Formation of Species, Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
5. Bauwens, D. & Diaz-Uriarte, R. 1997. Covariation of life-history traits in lacertid lizards: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 149: 91-111.
6. Blomberg, S.P. & Garland, T. Jr. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 899-910.
7. Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T. Jr. & Ives, A.R. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57: 717-745.
8. Collins, T.M., Frazer, K., Palmer, A.R., Vermeij, G.J. & Brown, W.M. 1996. Evolutionary history of Northern Hemisphere Nucella (Gastropoda, Muricidae): molecular, morphological, ecological, and paleontological evidence. Evolution 50: 2287-2304.
9. Crespi, B.J. & Teo, R. 2002. Comparative phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of semelparity and life history in salmonid fishes. Evolution 56: 1008-1020.
10. Diaz-Uriarte, R. & Garland, T.Jr. 1996. Testing hypotheses of correlated evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts: sensitivity to deviations from Brownian motion. Syst. Biol. 45: 27-47.
11. Dobler, S., Mardulyn, P., Pasteels, J.M. & Rowell-Rahier, M. 1996. Host-plant switches and the evolution of chemical defense and life history in the leaf beetle genus Oreina. Evolution 50: 2373-2386.
12. Edwards, S.V. & Kot, M. 1995. Comparative methods at the species level: geographic variation in morphology and group size in grey-crowned babblers (Pomatostomus temporalis). Evolution 49: 1134-1146.
13. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125: 1-15.
14. Felsenstein, J. 2002. Contrasts for a within-species comparative method. In: Modern Developments in Theoretical Population Genetics (M. Slatkin & M. Veuille, eds.), pp. 118-129. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
15. Freckleton, R.P., Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160: 712-726.
16. Garland, T. Jr. & Ives, A.R. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155: 346-364.
17. Garland, T. Jr., Dickerman, A.W., Janis, C.M. & Jones, A.A. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42: 265-292.
18. Garland, T. Jr., Midford, P.E. & Ives, A.R. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Amer. Zool. 39: 374-388.
19. Geffen, E., Gompper, M.E., Gittleman, J.L., Luh, H., Macdonald, D.W. & Wayne, R.K. 1996. Size, life-history traits, and social organization in the Canidae: a reevaluation. Am. Nat. 147: 140-160.
20. Hansen, T.F., Armbruster, W.S. & Antonsen, L. 2000. Comparative analysis of character displacement and spatial adaptations as illustrated by the evolution of Dalechampia blossoms. Am. Nat. 156: S17-S34.
21. Harvey, P.H. & Pagel, M.D. 1991. The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, UK.
22. Klauber, L.M. 1972. Rattlesnakes: Their Habits, Life Histories, and Influence on Mankind. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
23. Lapointe, F.J. & Garland, T. Jr. 2001. A generalized permutation model for the analysis of cross-species data. J. Classification 18: 109-127.
24. Leache, A.D. & Reeder, T.W. 2002. Molecular systematics of the eastern fence lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Syst. Biol. 51: 44-68.
25. Lynch, M. 1991. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45: 1065-1080.
26. Martins, E.P. 1993. A comparative study of the evolution of Sceloporus push-up displays. Am. Nat. 142: 994-1018.
27. Martins, E.P. 1996. Phylogenies, spatial autoregression, and the comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 50: 1750-1765.
28. Martins, E.P. & Garland, T. Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45: 534-557.
29. Martins, E.P. & Hansen, T.F. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: a review and evaluation of phylogenetic comparative methods. In: Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior (E.P. Martins, ed.), pp. 22-75. Oxford University Press, New York.
30. Miles, D.B. & Dunham, A.E. 1996. The paradox of the phylogeny: character displacement analyses of body size in island Anolis. Evolution 50: 594-603.
31. Murphy, R.W., Fu, J., Lathrop, A., Feltham, J.V. & Kovac, V. 2002. Phylogeny of the rattlesnakes (Crotalus and Sistrurus) inferred from sequences of five mitochondrial DNA genes. In: Biology of the Vipers (G.W. Schuett, M. Hoggren, M.E. Douglas & H.W. Greene, eds.), pp. 69-92. Eagle Mountain Publishing, Eagle Mountain, UT.
32. Pagel, M.D. 1992. A method for the analysis of comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 156: 431-442.
33. Petren, K. & Case, T.J. 1997. A phylogenetic analysis of body size evolution and biogeography in chuckwallas (Sauromalus) and other iguanines. Evolution 51: 206-219.
34. de Queiroz, A., Lawson, R. & Lemos-Espinal, J.A. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of North American garter snakes (Thamnophis) based on four mitochondrial genes: how much DNA sequence is enough? Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22: 315-329.
35. Radtkey, R.R., Fallon, S.M. & Case, T.J. 1997. Character displacement in some Cnemidophorus lizards revisited: a phylogenetic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 9740-9745.
36. Richman, A.D. 1996. Ecological diversification and community structure in the Old World leaf warblers (genus Phylloscopus): a phylogenetic perspective. Evolution 50: 2461-2470.
37. Rohlf, F.J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55: 2143-2160.
38. Rossman, D.A., Ford, N.B. & Seigel, R.A. 1996. The Garter Snakes: Evolution and Ecology. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
39. Webster, M.S. 1992. Sexual dimorphism, mating system and body size in New World blackbirds (Icterinae). Evolution 46: 1621-1641.
40. Wiens, J.J. & Reeder, T.W. 1997. Phylogeny of the spiny lizards (Sceloporus) based on molecular and morphological evidence. Herpetol. Monogr. 11: 1-101.
41. Zamudio, K.R. 1998. The evolution of female-biased sexual size dimorphism: a population-level comparative study in horned lizards (Phrynosoma). Evolution 52: 1821-1833.
42. Zamudio, K.R., Jones, K.B. & Ward, R.H. 1997. Molecular systematics of short-horned lizards: biogeography and taxonomy of a widespread species complex. Syst. Biol. 46: 284-305.