Clinical behaviour of glass ionomer restorations in primary teeth

Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 437-442

  Espelid, I ^a   Tveit, A B ^a   Tornes, K H ^b   Alvheim, H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b Public Dental Health Service   (Norway)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Durability; Paediatric dentistry; Primary dentition; Resin modified glass ionomer cement; Restorations; Silver cermet glass ionomer; Survival analysis; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

CEMENT; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN; VITREMER;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTITION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURVIVAL;

CERMET CEMENTS; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTITION, PRIMARY; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; RECURRENCE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033173542     PISSN: 03005712     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00004-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Amarante EC. Prevalence of dental caries and periodontal disease in 5-, 12-, and 18-year-old children in Bergen, Norway [M.Sc. Thesis]. Bergen: University of Bergen, 1995.
2. Widström E, Birn H, Haugejorden O, Sundberg H. Fear of amalgam: dentists' experiences in the Nordic countries. International Dental Journal 1992;42:65-70.
3. Östlund J, Möller K, Koch G. Amalgam, composite resin glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars-a three year clinical evaluation. Swedish Dental Journal 1992;16:81-86.
4. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. Journal of Dental Research 1997;76:1387-1396.
5. Holst A. A 3-year clinical evaluation of Ketac-Silver restorations in primary molars. Swedish Dental Journal 1996;20:209-214.
6. Kilpatrick NM. Durability of restorations in primary molars. Journal of Dentistry 1993;21:67-73.
7. Welbury RR, Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe F. The 5-year results of a clinical trial comparing a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement restoration with an amalgam restoration. British Dental Journal 1991;170:177-181.
8. Hickel R, Voss A. A comparison of glass cermet cement and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1990;57:184-188.
9. Forsten L, Karjalainen S. Glass ionomers in proximal cavities of primary molars. Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research 1990;98:70-73.
10. Hung TW, Richardson AS. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations in primary molars: one year results. Journal of Canadian Dental Association 1990;56:239-240.
11. Walls AW, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The use of glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements in the deciduous dentition. British Dental Journal 1988;165:13-17.
12. McLean JW, Gasser O. Glass-cermet cements. Quintessence International 1985;16:333-343.
13. Croll PT, Phillips RW. Glass ionomer-silver cermet restorations for primary teeth. Quintessence International 1986;17:607-615.
14. Walls AW, Adamson J, McCabe JF, Murray J. The properties of a glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cement incorporating sintered metallic particles. Dental Materials 1987;3:113-116.
15. Beyls HM, Verbeeck RM, Martens LC, Lemaitre L. Compressive strength of some polyalkenoates with or without dental amalgam alloy incorporation. Dental Materials 1991;7:151-154.
16. Williams JA, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. The comparative strengths of commercial glass-ionomer cements with and without metal additions. British Dental Journal 1992;172:279-282.
17. McKinney JE, Antonucci JM, Rupp NW. Wear and microhardness of a silver-sintered glass-ionomer cement. Journal of Dental Research 1988;67:831-835.
18. Kilpatrick NM, Murray JJ, McCabe JF. The use of a reinforced glass-ionomer cermet for the restoration of primary molars: a clinical trial. British Dental Journal 1995;179:175-179.
19. Li J, Liu Y, Liu Y, Söremark R, Sundström F. Flexure strength of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and their bond strength to dental composites. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1996;54:55-58.
20. Uno S, Finger WJ, Fritz U. Long-term mechanical characteristics of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dental Materials 1996;12:64-69.
21. Mitra SB, Kedrowski BL. Long-term mechanical properties of glass ionomers. Dental Materials 1994;10:78-82.
22. Croll TP, Killian CM. Glass-ionomer-resin restoration of primary molars with adjacent Class II carious lesions. Quintessence International 1993;24:723-727.
23. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. Journal of Dental Research 1996;75:1613-1619.
24. Attin T, Buchalla W, Kielbassa AM, Helwig E. Curing shrinkage and volumetric changes of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials. Dental Materials 1995;11:359-362.
25. Croll TP, Helpin ML. Class II Vitremer restoration of primary molars. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1995;62:17-21.
26. Nicholson JW, Croll TP. Glass-ionomer cements in restorative dentistry. Quintessence International 1997;28:705-714.
27. Ryge G, Snyder M. Evaluating the clinical quality of restorations. Journal of American Dental Association 1973;87:369-377.
28. Ryge G. Clinical criteria. International Dental Journal 1980;30:347-358.
29. Davies JA. Dental restoration longevity: a critique of the life table method of analysis. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1987;15:202-204.
30. Riordan PJ, FitzGerald PE. Outcome measures in split mouth caries trials and their statistical evaluation. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1994;22:192-197.
31. Tobi H, Kreulen CM, Gruythuyson RJ, van Amerongen WE. The analysis of restoration survival data in split-mouth designs. Journal of Dentistry 1998;26:293-298.
32. Levering NJ, Messer LB. The durability of primary molar restorations: I. Observations and predictions of success of amalgams. Pediatric Dentistry 1988;10:74-80.
33. Holland IS, Walls AW, Wallwork MA, Murray JJ. The longevity of amalgam restorations in deciduous molars. British Dental Journal 1986;161:255-258.
34. Roberts JF, Sherriff M. The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed crown molar restorations placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice. British Dental Journal 1990;169:237-244.
35. Curzon ME, Pollard MA, Duggal MS. Restoration of primary molars [letter; comment]. British Dental Journal 1996;180:246.
36. van Dijken JW. A 6-year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/ onlay system and glass ionomer cement-composite resin sandwich restorations. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1994;52:368-376.
37. Frieddl KH. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: fluoride release and influence on Streptococcus mutans growth. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1997;105:81-85.