The teaching of Class I and II restorations in primary molars: A survey of North American dental schools

Pediatric Dentistry

Volumn 23, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 410-414

  Guelmann, Marcio ^a   Mjör, Ivar A ^a   Jerrell, Odont Greg R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; DENTAL ALLOY; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLASSIFICATION; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL EDUCATION; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTISTRY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MOLAR TOOTH; PRESCHOOL CHILD; QUESTIONNAIRE; TEACHING; UNITED STATES;

CANADA; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL CAVITY LINING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTISTRY, OPERATIVE; EDUCATION, DENTAL; HUMANS; MOLAR; PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOLS, DENTAL; TEACHING; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035460533     PISSN: 01641263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Houpt M. Project TAPP, Task Analysis of Procedures in Pedodontics. United States Public Health Service Final report, (Litho), 1975.
2. Guelmann M, Fuks AB, Holan G, Grajower R. Marginal leakage of Class II glass-ionomer-silver restorations, with and without posterior composite coverage: an in-vitro study. J Dent Child 56:277-282, 1989.
3. Eidelman E, Fuks A, Chosack A. A clinical, radiographic, and SEM evaluation of Class II Composite restorations in primary teeth. Oper Dent 14:58-63, 1989.
4. Oldenburg TR, Vann WFJr, Dilley DC. Composite restorations for primary molars: two-years results. Pediatr Dent 7:96-103, 1985.
5. Varpio M. Proximocclusal composite restorations in primary molars: a six-year follow-up. J Dent Child 52:435-440, 1985.
6. Holan G, Chosack A, Casamassimo PS, Eidelman E. Marginal leakage of impregnated Class II composites in primary molars: an in vivo study. Oper Dent 17:122-128, 1992.
7. Andersson-Wenckert IE, Folkesson UH, van Dijken JW. Durability of a polyacid-modified composite resin (compomer) in primary molars:a multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 55:255-260, 1997.
8. Hse KMY, Wei SHI. Clinical evaluation of compomer in primary teeth: 1-year results. JADA 128:1088-1096, 1997.
9. Roeters JJM, Frankenmolen F, Burgerdijk RCW, Peters TCRB. Clinical evaluation of Dyract in primary molars: 3-year results. Am J Dent 11:143-148, 1998.
10. Marks LAM, van Amerongen WE, Kreulen CM, Weerheijm KL, Martens LC. Conservative interproximal box-only poly-acid modified composite restorations in primary molars, 12-month clinical results. J Dent Child 66:23-29, 1999.
11. Mass E, Gordon M, Fuks AB. Assessment of compomer proximal restorations in primary molars: a retrospective study in children. J Dent Child 66:93-97, 1999.
12. Papagiannoulis L, Kakaboura A, Pantaleon F, Kavvadia K. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) in Class II restorations of primary teeth: a two-year follow-up study. Pediatr Dent 21:231-234, 1999.
13. Fuks AB, Araujo FB, Osorio LB, Hadani PE, Pinto AS. Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent 22:479-485, 2000.
14. Croll TP, Helpin MK. Class II Vitremer restorations of primary molars. J Dent Child 62:17-21, 1995.
15. Qvist V, Laurberg L, Poulsen A, Teglers PT. Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res 76:1387-1396, 1997.
16. Donly KJ, Grangennet C. Dentin demineralization inhibition at restoration margins of Vitremer, Dyract and Compoglass. Am J Dent 11:245-248, 1998.
17. Tonn EM, Gunnar R. Clinical evaluations of composite resin restorations in primary molars: a 4-year follow up study. JADA 117:603-606, 1998.
18. Christensen GJ. Restorations of pediatric posterior teeth. JADA 127:106-108, 1996.
19. Corbin SB, Kohn WG. The benefits and risks of dental amalgam: current findings reviewed. JADA 125:381-388, 1994.
20. Donly KJ, Segura A. Clinical Performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations. JADA 130:1459-1466, 1999.
21. Qvist V, Qyist J, Mjör LA. Placement and longevity of tooth-colored restorations in Denmark. Acta Odontol Scand 48:305-311, 1990.
22. rd ed. Pinkham JR, Casamassimo PS, McTigue DJ, Fields HW, Nowak A. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Co; 1999:309-340.
23. Garcia-Godoy F. Resin-based composites and compomers in primary molars. Dent Clin North Am 44:541-570, 2000.
24. Mjör IA, Wilson NHF. Teaching Class I and Class II direct composite restorations: results of a survey of dental schools. JADA 129:1415-1421, 1998.
25. Wilson NHF, Mjör IA. The teaching of Class I and Class II direct composite restorations in European dental schools. J Dent 28:15-21, 2000.
26. Fukushima M, Iwaku M, Setcos JC, Wilson NHF, Mjör IA. Teaching of posterior composite restorations in Japanese dental schools [abstract 1633]. J Dent Res 77:836, 1998.
27. Gordan W, Mjör IA, Veiga Filho LC, Ritter AV. Teaching of posterior resin-based composite restorations in Brazilian dental schools. Quintessence 31:735-740, 2000.
28. Christensen GJ. Restorative dentistry for pediatric teeth State of the art 2001. JADA 132:379-381, 2001.
29. Hickel R, Manhart J. Glass-ionomers and Compomers in pediatric dentistry. In: Advances in Glass-Ionomer Cements. Davidson CL, Mjör IA. Quintessence Publishing Co; 1999:201-226.