Analysis and interpretation of quadratic models of receptive fields

Nature Protocols

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 400-407

  Berkes, Pietro ^a   Wiskott, Laurenz ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE FUNCTION; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NEUROTRANSMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; SIMULATION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL CORTEX;

MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 34347225577     PISSN: 17542189     EISSN: 17502799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2007.27     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Berkes, P. & Wiskott, L. Applying slow feature analysis to image sequences yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. In Artificial Neural Networks-ICANN 2002 Proceedings, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (ed. Dorronsoro, J.R.) 81-86 (Springer, Berlin, 2002).
2. Berkes, P. & Wiskott, L. Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. J. Vis. 5, 579-602 (2005).
3. Marmarelis, P. & Marmarelis, V. Analysis of physiological systems: the white-noise approach (Plenum Press, New York, 1978).
4. de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. & Bialek, W. Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: Coding and information transfer in short spike sequences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 234, 379-414 (1988).
5. Lewis, E.R., Henry, K.R. & Yamada, W.M. Tuning and timing in the gerbil ear: Wiener-kernel analysis. Hear. Res. 174, 206-221 (2002).
6. Touryan, J., Lau, B. & Dan, Y. Isolation of relevant visual features from random stimuli for cortical complex cells. J. Neurosci. 22 10811-10818 (2002).
7. Rust, N.C., Schwartz, O., Movshon, J.A. & Simoncelli, E.P. Spike-triggered characterization of excitatory and suppressive stimulus dimensions in monkey V1. Neurocomp. 58-60, 793-799 (2004).
8. Simoncelli, E.P., Paninski, L., Pillow, J.W. & Schwartz, O. Characterization of neural responses with stochastic stimuli. In The Cognitive Neurosciences 3rd edn. (ed. Gazzaniga, M.S.) 327-338 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2004).
9. Rust, N.C., Schwartz, O., Movshon, J.A. & Simoncelli, E.P. Spatiotemporal elements of macaque V1 receptive fields. Neuron 46, 945-956 (2005).
10. Touryan, J., Felsen, G. & Dan, Y. Spatial structure of complex cell receptive fields measured with natural images. Neuron 45, 781-791 (2005).
11. Rapela, J., Mendel, J.M. & Grzywacz, N.M. Estimating nonlinear receptive fields from natural images. J. Vis. 4, 441-474 (2006).
12. Schwartz, O., Pillow, J.W., Rust, N.C. & Simoncelli, E.P. Spike-triggered neural characterization. J. Vis. 6, 484-507 (2006).
13. Franz, M.O. & Schölkopf, B. A unifying view of Wiener and Volterra theory and polynomial kernel regression. Neural Comput. 18, 3097-3118 (2006).
14. Hashimoto, W. Quadratic forms in natural images. Netw. Comput. Neural Syst. 14, 765-788 (2003).
15. Bartsch, H. & Obermayer, K. Second-order statistics of natural images. Neurocomp. 52-54, 467-472 (2003).
16. Hyvärinen, A. & Hoyer, P. Emergence of phase- and shift-invariant features by decomposition of natural images into independent feature subspaces. Neural Comput. 12, 1705-1720 (2000).
17. Hyvärinen, A. & Hoyer, P. A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images. Vision Res. 41, 2413-2423 (2001).
18. Körding, K.P., Kayser, C., Einhäuser, W. & König, P. How are complex cell properties adapted to the statistics of natural stimuli? J. Neurophysiol. 91, 206-212 (2004).
19. Adelson, E.H. & Bergen, J.R. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 2, 284-299 (1985).
20. Berkes, P. & Wiskott, L. On the analysis and interpretation of inhomogeneous quadratic forms as receptive fields. Neural Comput. 18, 1868-1895 (2006).
21. Wiskott, L. & Sejnowski, T.J. Slow feature analysis: Unsupervised learning of invariances. Neural Comput. 14, 715-770 (2002).
22. Jones, J.P. & Palmer, L.A. An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 58, 1233-1257 (1987).