How Are Complex Cell Properties Adapted to the Statistics of Natural Stimuli?

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 206-212

  Körding, Konrad P ^a,b   Kayser, Christoph ^b   Einhäuser, Wolfgang ^b   König, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; CAMERA; CAT; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; IMAGERY; MOTION; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORY STIMULATION; TIME; VISIBILITY; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX;

ANIMALS; CATS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 18244431804     PISSN: 00223077     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00149.2003     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Adelson EH and Bergen JR. Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Optic Soc Am A 2: 284-299, 1985.
2. Baddeley R, Abbott LF, Booth MC, Sengpiel F, Freeman T, Wakeman EA, and Rolls ET. Responses of neurons in primary and inferior temporal visual cortices to natural scenes. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 264: 1775-1783, 1997.
3. Barlow HB. Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Sensory, Communication, edited by Rosenblith W. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1961, p. 336-360.
4. Becker S. Implicit learning in 3D object recognition: the importance of temporal context. Neural Comput 11: 347-374, 1999.
5. Bell AJ and Sejnowski TJ. The "independent components" of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Res 37: 3327-3338, 1997.
6. Chance FS, Nelson SB, and Abbott LF. Complex cells as cortically amplified simple cells. Nat Neurosci 2: 277-282, 1999.
7. Einhäuser W, Kayser C, König P, and Körding KP. Learning the invariance properties of complex cells from natural stimuli. Eur J Neurosci 15: 475-486, 2002.
8. Földiak P. Learning invariance from transformation sequences. Neural Comput 3: 194-200, 1991.
9. Fukushima K. Neocognitron: a self organizing neural network model for a mechanism of pattern recognition unaffected by shift in position. Biol Cybern 36: 193-202, 1980.
10. Fyfe C and Baddeley R. Finding compact and sparse-distributed representations of visual images. Network Comput Neural Syst 6: 333-344, 1995.
11. Heeger DJ. Half-squaring in responses of cat striate cells. Vis Neurosci 9: 427-443, 1992.
12. Hubel DH and Wiesel TN. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol 160: 106-154, 1962.
13. Hurri J and Hyvärinen A. Simple-cell-like receptive fields maximize temporal coherence in natural video. Neural Comput 15: 663-691, 2003.
14. Hyvärinen A and Hoyer P. Emergence of phase- and shift-invariant features by decomposition of natural images into independent feature subspaces. Neural Comput 12: 1705-1720, 2000.
15. Kayser C, Einhäuser W, Dümmer O, K̈nig P, and Körding K. Extracting slow subspaces from natural videos leads to complex cells. In: ICANN, edited by Dorffner G, Bischoff H, and Kornik K. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2001, p. 1075-1080.
16. Kayser C, Einhäuser W, and König P. Temporal correlations of orientations in natural scenes. Neurocomputing 52: 117-123, 2003.
17. Kjaer TW, Gawne TJ, Hertz JA, and Richmond BJ. Insensitivity of V1 complex cell responses to small shifts in the retinal image of complex patterns. J Neurophysiol 78: 3187-3197, 1997.
18. Klopf AH. The Hedonistic Neuron: A Theory of Memory, Learning, and Intelligence. Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1982.
19. Müller G, Einhäuser W, and König P. Cats' eye movements under natural conditions. Soc Neurosci Abstr 386.5, 2003.
20. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, and Tolhurst DJ. Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol 283: 79-99, 1978.
21. Ohzawa I, DeAngelis GC, and Freeman RD. Encoding of binocular disparity by complex cells in the cat's visual cortex. J Neurophysiol 77: 2879-2909, 1997.
22. Ohzawa I and Freeman W. Spatial pooling of subunits in complex cell receptive fields. Soc Neurosci Abstr 23: 1669, 1997.
23. Olshausen B and Field D. Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381: 607-609, 1996.
24. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, and Volman SF. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. J Neurophysiol 39: 1320-1333, 1976a.
25. Schiller PH, Finlay BL, and Volman SF. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. III. Spatial frequency. J Neurophysiol 39: 1334-1351, 1976b.
26. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG, and Bonds AB. Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res 31: 1079-1086, 1991.
27. Spitzer H and Hochstein S. Simple and complex-cell response dependences on stimulation parameters. J Neurophysiol 53: 1244-1265, 1985.
28. Spitzer H and Hochstein S. Complex-cell receptive field models. Prog Neurobiol 31: 285-309, 1988.
29. Stone JV and Harper N. Temporal constraints on visual learning: a computational model. Perception 28: 1089-1104, 1999.
30. Sutton RS and Barto AG. An adaptive network that constructs and uses an internal model of its world. Cognit Brain Theory 3: 217-246, 1981.
31. Van Hateren JH and van der Schaaf A. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265, 1998.
32. Vinje WE and Gallant JL. Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision. Science 287: 1273-1276, 2000.
33. Wallis G and Rolls ET. Invariant face and object recognition in the visual system. Prog Neurobiol 51: 167-194, 1997.
34. Webster M and De Valois RL. Relationship between spatial-frequency and orientation tuning of striate-cortex cells. J Opt Soc Am A 2: 1124-1132, 1985.
35. Wiskott L and Sejnowski TJ. Slow feature analysis: unsupervised learning of invariances. Neural Comput 14: 715-770, 2002.