On the analysis and interpretation of inhomogeneous quadratic forms as receptive fields

Neural Computation

Volumn 18, Issue 8, 2006, Pages 1868-1895

  Berkes, Pietro ^a   Wiskott, Laurenz ^a  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN CORTEX; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; HUMAN; NERVE CELL; NERVE CELL INHIBITION; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVE TRACT; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; VISION; VISUAL FIELD;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; CEREBRAL CORTEX; EXCITATORY POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIALS; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURAL PATHWAYS; NEURONS; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION; VISION; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33745930513     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2006.18.8.1868     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adelson, E. H., & Bergen, J. R. (1985). Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 2(2), 284-299.
2. Baddeley, R., Abbott, L., Booth, M., Sengpiel, F., Freeman, T., Wakeman, E., & Rolls, E. (1997). Responses of neurons in primary and inferior temporal visual cortices to natural scenes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 264(1389), 1775-1783.
3. Bartsch, H., & Obermayer, K. (2003). Second-order statistics of natural images. Neurocomputing, 52-54, 467-472.
4. Berkes, P., & Wiskott, L. (2002). Applying slow feature analysis to image sequences yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. In J. R. Dorronsoro (Ed.), Artificial Neural Networks - ICANN 2002 Proceedings (pp. 81-86). Berlin: Springer.
5. Berkes, P., & Wiskott, L. (2005a). On the analysis and interpretation of inhomogeneous quadratic forms as receptive fields. Cognitive Sciences EPrint Archive (CogPrints) 4081, http://cogprints.org/4081/.
6. Berkes, P., & Wiskott, L. (2005b). Slow feature analysis yields a rich repertoire of complex cell properties. Journal of Vision, 5(6), 579-602, http://journalofvision.org/5/6/9, doi: 10.1167/5.6.9.
7. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2001). Theoretical neuroscience: Computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. De Valois, R., Albrecht, D., & Thorell, L. (1982). Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res., 22, 545-559.
9. De Valois, R., Yund, E., & Hepler, N. (1982). The orientation and direction selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Res., 22(5), 531-544.
10. Fortin, C. (2000). A survey of the trust region subproblem within a semidefinite framework. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Waterloo.
11. Hashimoto, W. (2003). Quadratic forms in natural images. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, 14(4), 765-788.
12. Hubel, D., & Wiesel, T. (1962). Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 160, 106-154.
13. Hyvärinen, A., & Hoyer, P. (2000). Emergence of phase and shift invariant features by decomposition of natural images into independent feature subspaces. Neural Computation, 12(7), 1705-1720.
14. Hyvärinen, A., & Hoyer, P. (2001). A two-layer sparse coding model learns simple and complex cell receptive fields and topography from natural images. Vision Research, 41(18), 2413-2423.
15. Jones, J. P., & Palmer, L. A. (1987). An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 58(6), 1233-1257.
16. Jutten, C., & Karhunen, J. (2003). Advances in nonlinear blind source separation. Proc. of the 4th Int. Symp. on Independent Component Analysis and Blind Signal Separation (ICA2003) (pp. 245-256).
17. Körding, K., Kayser, C., Einhäuser, W., & König, P. (2004). How are complex cell properties adapted to the statistics of natural scenes? Journal of Neurophysiology, 91(1), 206-212.
18. Lewis, E., Henry, K., & Yamada, W. (2002). Tuning and timing in the gerbil ear: Wiener-kernel analysis. Hearing Research, 174, 206-221.
19. MacKay, D. (1985). The significance of "feature sensitivity." In D. Rose & V. Dobson (Eds.), Models of the visual cortex (pp. 47-53). New York: Wiley.
20. Marmarelis, P., & Marmarelis, V. (1978). Analysis of physiological systems: The white-noise approach. New York: Plenum Press.
21. Pollen, D., & Ronner, S. (1981). Phase relationship between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. Science, 212, 1409-1411.
22. Rust, N. C., Schwartz, O., Movshon, J. A., & Simoncelli, E. (2004). Spike-triggered characterization of excitatory and suppressive stimulus dimensions in monkey V1. Neurocomputing, 58-60, 793-799.
23. Schiller, P., Finlay, B., & Volman, S. (1976a). Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. J. Neurophysiol., 39(6), 1288-1319.
24. Schiller, P., Finlay, B., & Volman, S. (1976b). Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. II. Orientation specificity and ocular dominance. J. Neurophysiol., 39(6), 1320-1333.
25. Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., & Müller, K.-R. (1998). Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation, 10(5), 1299-1319.
26. Schwartz, O., Chichilnisky, E., & Simoncelli, E. (2002). Characterizing neural gain control using spike-triggered covariance. In T. G. Dietterich, S. Becker, & Z. Ghahramani (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems, 14 (pp. 269-276). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27. Simoncelli, E. P., Pillow, J., Paninski, L., & Schwartz, O. (2004). Characterization of neural responses with stochastic stimuli. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (3rd ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Stork, D., & Levinson, J. (1982). Receptive fields and the optimal stimulus. Science, 216, 204-205.
29. Touryan, J., Lau, B., & Dan, Y. (2002). Isolation of relevant visual features from random stimuli for cortical complex cells. Journal of Neuroscience, 22(24), 10811-10818.
30. van Steveninck, R., & Bialek, W. (1988). Coding and information transfer in short spike sequences. Proc. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci., 234, 379-414.
31. Walter, W. (1995). Analysis 2. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
32. Wiskott, L., & Sejnowski, T. (2002). Slow feature analysis: Unsupervised learning of invariances. Neural Computation, 14(4), 715-770.