Isolation of relevant visual features from random stimuli for cortical complex cells

Journal of Neuroscience

Volumn 22, Issue 24, 2002, Pages 10811-10818

  Touryan, Jon ^a   Lau, Brian ^b   Dan, Yang ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex cell; Nonlinear; Primary visual cortex; Principal component analysis; Spatiotemporal; Wiener kernel

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BRAIN CELL; CAT; CELL INTERACTION; CELL STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE UNIT ACTIVITY; SPIKE; VISION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 0037115105     PISSN: 02706474     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.22-24-10811.2002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adelson EH, Bergen JR (1985) Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion. J Opt Soc Am A 2:284-299.
2. Albrecht DG, Geisler WS (1991) Motion selectivity and the contrast-response function of simple cells in the visual cortex. Vis Neurosci 7:531-546.
3. Allman J, Miezin F, McGuinness E (1985) Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons. Annu Rev Neurosci 8:407-430.
4. Anzai A, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (1999) Neural mechanisms for processing binocular information. I. Simple cells. J Neurophysiol 82:891-908.
5. Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1997) The "independent components" of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Res 37:3327-3338.
6. Bonds AB (1989) Role of inhibition in the specification of orientation selectivity of cells in the cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 2:41-55.
7. Brenner N, Bialek W, de Ruyter van Steveninck R (2000) Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission. Neuron 26:695-702.
8. Brodie SE, Knight BW, Ratliff F (1978) The response of the Limulus retina to moving stimuli: A prediction by Fourier synthesis. J Gen Physiol 72:129-166.
9. Carandini M, Heeger DJ, Movshon JA (1997) Linearity and normalization in simple cells of the macaque primary visual cortex. J Neurosci 17:8621-8644.
10. Dan Y, Atick JJ, Reid RC (1996) Efficient coding of natural scenes in the lateral geniculate nucleus: Experimental test of a computational theory. J Neurosci 16:3351-3362.
11. de Boer E, Kuyper P (1968) Triggered correlation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 15:169-179.
12. de Ruyter van Steveninck R, Bialek W (1988) Real-time performance of a movement-sensitive neuron in the blowfly visual system: Coding and information transfer in short spike sequences. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 234:379-414.
13. Efron B, Tibshirani RJ (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman and Hall.
14. Heeger DJ (1991) Nonlinear model of neural responses in cat visual cortex. In: Computational Models of Visual Processing (Landy MS, Movshon JA, eds), pp 119-133. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
15. Heeger DJ (1992) Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex. Vis Neurosci 9:181-197.
16. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN (1962) Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 160:106-154.
17. Jones JP, Palmer LA (1987) The two-dimensional spatial structure of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 58:1187-1211.
18. Lau B, Stanley GB, Dan Y (2002) Computational subunits of visual cortical neurons revealed by artificial neural networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:8974-8979.
19. Marmeralis P, Marmeralis V (1978) Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White Noise Approach. New York: Plenum.
20. Movshon JA, Thompson ID, Tolhurst DJ (1978) Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 283:79-99.
21. Olshausen BA, Field DJ (1996) Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381:607-609.
22. Pollen DA, Ronner SF (1981) Phase relationships between adjacent simple cells in the visual cortex. Science 212:1409-1411.
23. Reid RC, Victor JD, Shapley RM (1997) The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: Linear receptive field properties. Vis Neurosci 14:1015-1027.
24. Schwartz O, Simoncelli EP (2001) Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control. Nat Neurosci 4:819-825.
25. Schwartz O, Chichilnisky EJ, Simoncelli EP (2001) Characterizing neural gain control using spike-triggered covariance. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Dietterich TG, Becker S, Ghahramani Z, eds). Cambridge, MA: MIT, in press.
26. Skottun BC, De Valois RL, Grosof DH, Movshon JA, Albrecht DG, Bonds AB (1991) Classifying simple and complex cells on the basis of response modulation. Vision Res 31:1079-1086.
27. Sutter EE (1987) A practical non-stochastic approach to nonlinear time-domain analysis. In: Advanced Methods of Physiological Systems Modeling (Marmarelis VZ, ed), pp 303-315. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.
28. Touryan J, Dan Y (2001) Analysis of sensory coding with complex stimuli. Curr Opin Neurobiol 11:443-448.
29. van Hateren JH, Ruderman DL (1998) Independent component analysis of natural image sequences yields spatio-temporal filters similar to simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 265:2315-2320.
30. Walker GA, Ohzawa I, Freeman RD (2000) Suppression outside the classical cortical receptive field. Vis Neurosci 17:369-379.
31. Wiener N (1958) Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory. New York: Wiley.
32. Yamada WM, Lewis ER (1999) Predicting the temporal responses of non-phase-locking bullfrog auditory units to complex acoustic waveforms. Hear Res 130:155-170.