Population norms for frequency doubling perimetry with uncorrected refractive error

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 84, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 496-504

  Ve Ramesh, Sathyamangalam ^a   George, Ronnie ^a   Soni, Premal M ^b   Palaniappan, Lakshmanan ^b   Raju, Prema ^a   Paul, Pradeep G ^a   Ramsathish, Sivarathinasami ^a   Vijaya, Lingam ^a  

^a VISION RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (India)

^b MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (India)

Author keywords

Frequency doubling perimetry; Optical blur; Population based study; Uncorrected refractive blur; Visual fields

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; POPULATION STATISTICS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; VISION AIDS;

FREQUENCY DOUBLING PERIMETRY; POPULATION BASED STUDY; UNCORRECTED REFRACTIVE BLUR; VISUAL FIELDS;

MEDICAL PROBLEMS;

ADULT; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE EXAMINATION; FREQUENCY DOUBLING PERIMETRY; HUMAN; HYPERMETROPIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MYOPIA; PERIMETRY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPECTACLES; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; HUMANS; ITALY; MIDDLE AGED; NOMOGRAMS; PERIMETRY; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREVALENCE; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; URBAN POPULATION; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 34250761015     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e31806db55e     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;125:819-29.
2. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2003;16:213-25.
3. Anderson RS. The psychophysics of glaucoma: improving the structure/function relationship. Prog Retin Eye Res 2006;25:79-97.
4. White AJ, Sun H, Swanson WH, Lee BB. An examination of physiological physiological mechanisms underlying the frequency-doubling illusion. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:3590-9.
5. Quaid PT, Simpson T, Flanagan JG. Monocular and dichoptic masking effects on the frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res 2004;44:661-7.
6. Quaid PT, Simpson TL, Flanagan JG. Frequency doubling illusion: detection vs. form resolution. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:36-42.
7. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am 1966;56:1628-33.
8. Johnson CA, Wall M, Fingeret M, Lalle P. A Primer for Frequency Doubling Technology. Dublin, CA: Humphrey Systems; 1998.
9. Legge GE, Mullen KT, Woo GC, Campbell FW. Tolerance to visual defocus. J Opt Soc Am 1987;4:851-63.
10. Anderson RS, McDowell DR, Ennis FA. Effect of localized defocus on detection thresholds for different sized targets in the fovea and periphery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2001;79:60-3.
11. Artes PH, Nicolela MT, McCormick TA, LeBlanc RP, Chauhan BC. Effects of blur and repeated testing on sensitivity estimates with frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:646-52.
12. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and optical defocus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4147-52.
13. Arvind H, Paul PG, Raju P, Baskaran M, George R, Balu S, Sripriya S, Ramesh SV, Mukesh BN, Vijaya L, Kumaramanickavel G, McCarty C. Methods and design of the Chennai Glaucoma Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2003;10:337-48.
14. Chylack LT Jr, Leske MC, McCarthy D, Khu P, Kashiwagi T, Sperduto R. Lens opacities classification system II (LOCS II). Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107:991-7.
15. Horani A, Frenkel S, Yahalom C, Farber MD, Ticho U, Blumenthal EZ. The learning effect in visual field testing of healthy subjects using frequency doubling technology. J Glaucoma 2002;11:511-6.
16. Joson PJ, Kamantigue ME, Chen PP. Learning effects among perimetric novices in frequency doubling technology perimetry. Ophthalmology 2002;109:757-60.
17. McKendrick AM, Anderson AJ, Johnson CA, Fortune B. Appearance of the frequency doubling stimulus in normal subjects and patients with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1111-6.
18. Adams CW, Bullimore MA, Wall M, Fingeret M, Johnson CA. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:582-7.
19. Atchison DA. Effect of defocus on visual field measurement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1987;7:259-65.
20. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:648-56.
21. Ito A, Kawabata H, Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E. Effect of myopia on frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1107-10.