Frequency-doubling technology perimetry and optical defocus

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 4147-4152

  Anderson, Andrew John ^b   Johnson, Chris A ^a  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; OPTICAL DEFOCUS; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; SPECTACLES; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; HUMANS; PERIMETRY; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0042862905     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-1076     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am. 1966;56:1628-1633.
2. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
3. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM. Evaluation of two screening tests for frequency doubling technology perimetry. In: Wall M, Wild JM, eds. Perimetry Update 1998/1999. Proceedings of the XIIIth International Perimetric Society Meeting, Gardone Riviera (BS), Italy, September 6-9, 1998. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 1999:103-109.
4. Maddess T, Goldberg I, Dobinson J, Wine S, Welsh AH, James AC. Testing for glaucoma with the spatial frequency doubling illusion. Vision Res. 1999;39:4258-4273.
5. Maddess T, Severt WL. Testing for glaucoma with the frequency-doubling illusion in the whole, macular and eccentric visual fields. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999;27:194-196.
6. Green DG, Campbell FW. Effect of focus on the visual response to a sinusoidally modulated spatial stimulus. J Opt Soc Am. 1965;55:1154-1157.
7. Atchison DA, Woods RL, Bradley A. Predicting the effects of optical defocus on human contrast sensitivity. J Opt Soc Am A. 1998;15:2536-2544.
8. Strang NC, Atchison DA, Woods RL. Effects of defocus and pupil size on human contrast sensitivity. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1999;19:415-426.
9. Woods RL, Strang NC, Atchison DA. Measuring contrast sensitivity with inappropriate optical correction. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;20:442-451.
10. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Mechanisms isolated by frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:398-401.
11. Johnson CA, Cioffi GA, Van Buskirk EM. Frequency doubling technology perimetry using a 24-2 stimulus presentation pattern. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:571-581.
12. Spry PG, Johnson CA. Within-test variability of frequency-doubling perimetry using a 24-2 test pattern. J Glaucoma. 2002;11:315-320.
13. Mayer MJ, Spiegler SJ, Ward B, Glucs A, Kim CBY. Preliminary evaluation of flicker sensitivity as a predictive test for exudative age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:3150-3155.
14. Mayer MJ, Spiegler SJ, Ward B, Glucs A, Kim CBY. Foveal flicker sensitivity discriminates ARM-risk from healthy eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:3143-3149.
15. Mayer MJ, Spiegler SJ, Ward B, Glucs A, Kim CBY. Mid-frequency loss of foveal flicker sensitivity in early stages of age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:3136-3142.
16. Phipps JA, Guymer RH, Vingrys AJ. Temporal sensitivity deficits in patients with high-risk drusen. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999;27:265-267.
17. Vingrys AJ, Pesudovs K. Localized scotomata detected with temporal modulation perimetry in central serous chorioretinopathy. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1999;27:109-116.
18. Parker A. The effects of temporal modulation on the perceived spatial structure of sine-wave gratings. Perception. 1983;12:663-682.
19. McKendrick AM, Anderson AJ, Johnson CA, Fortune B. Appearance of the frequency doubling stimulus at threshold, in normals and glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:1111-1116.
20. King-Smith PE, Grigsby SS, Vingrys AJ, Benes SC, Supowit A. Efficient and unbiased modifications of the QUEST threshold method: theory, simulations, experimental evaluation and practical implementation. Vision Res. 1994;34:885-912.
21. Bailey IL, Lovie JE. New design principles for visual acuity letter charts. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1976;53:740-745.
22. Anastasi M, Brai M, Lauricella M, Geracitano R. Methodological aspects of the application of the Naka-Rushton equation to clinical electroretinogram. Ophthalmic Res. 1993;25:145-156.
23. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical Recipes in C. The Art of Scientific Computing. 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1992:659-661.
24. Kogure S, Membrey WL, Fitzke FW, Tsukahara S. Effect of decreased retinal illumination on frequency doubling technology. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000;44:489-493.
25. Anderson RS, McDowell DR, Ennis FA. Effect of localized defocus on detection thresholds for different sized targets in the fovea and periphery. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2001;79:60-63.
26. Heuer DK, Anderson DR, Feuer WJ, Gressel MG. The influence of refraction accuracy on automated perimetric threshold measurements. Ophthalmology. 1987;94:1550-1553.
27. Spry PGD, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1404-1410.
28. Goldstick BJ, Weinreb RN. The effect of refractive error on automated global analysis program G-1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;104:229-232.
29. Smith SD, Katz J, Quigley HA. Effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997;115:1515-1519.
30. Gillies WE, Brooks AM. Effect of lens opacity on the glaucomatous field of vision. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol. 1998;26:S19-S21.
31. Morales J, Weitzman ML, González de la Rosa M. Comparison between Tendency-Oriented Perimetry (TOP) and Octopus threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:134-142.
32. Maeda H, Nakuara M, Negi A. New perimetric threshold test algorithm with dynamic strategy and tendency oriented perimetry (TOP) in glaucomatous eyes. Eye. 2000;14:747-751.
33. González de la Rosa M, Mesa F, Arteaga V, Gonzá lez-Hernández M. Second generation of the Tendency Oriented Perimetry algorithm: TOP plus. In: Wall M, Mills RP, eds. Perimetry Update 2000/2001. Proceedings of the XIVth International Perimetric Society Meeting. Halifax (NS), Canada, September 6-9, 2000. The Hague, The Netherlands: Kugler Publications; 2001:155-159.
34. Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliot DB, Phillips NJ. Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:1132-1137.
35. Nio YK, Jansonius NM, Fidler V, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Kooijman AC. Age-related changes of defocus-specific contrast sensitivity in healthy subjects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2000;20:323-334.