Effects of blur and repeated testing on sensitivity estimates with frequency doubling perimetry

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 646-652

  Artes, Paul H ^a   Nicolela, Marcelo T ^a   McCormick, Terry A ^a   LeBlanc, Raymond P ^a   Chauhan, Balwantray C ^a,b  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b QUEEN ELIZABETH II HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; OPTICAL INSTRUMENTATION; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; REFRACTION ERROR; VISUAL FIELD;

ADULT; AGED; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; GLAUCOMA, OPEN-ANGLE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VISION DISORDERS; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 0037308514     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.02-0532     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency-doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
2. Green DG, Campbell FW. Effect of focus on the visual response to a sinusoidally modulated spatial stimulus. J Opt Soc Am. 1965;55:1154-1157.
3. Legge GE, Mullen KT, Woo GC, Campbell FW. Tolerance to visual defocus. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987;4:851-863.
4. Johnson C, Wall M, Fingeret M, Lalle P. A Primer for Frequency Doubling Technology. Dublin, CA: Humphrey Systems/Welch-Allyn, Inc.; 1998.
5. Paczka JA, Friedman DS, Quigley HA, Barron Y, Vitale S. Diagnostic capabilities of frequency-doubling technology, scanning laser polarimetry, and nerve fiber layer photographs to distinguish glaucomatous damage. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:188-197.
6. Quigley HA. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;125:819-829.
7. Thomas D, Thomas R, Muliyil JP, George R. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001;131:734-741.
8. Alward WL. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:376-378.
9. Zalta AH. Lens rim artifact in automated threshold perimetry. Ophthalmology. 1989;96:1302-1311.
10. Tyrrell A, Owens DA. A rapid technique to assess the resting states of the eyes and other threshold phenomena: the modified binary search (MOBS). Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1988;20:137-141.
11. Atchison DA. Effect of defocus on visual field measurement. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7:259-265.
12. Goldstick BJ, Weinreb RN. The effect of refractive error on automated global analysis program G-1. Am J Ophthalmol. 1987;104:229-232.
13. Matsumoto C, Okuyama S, Iwagaki A, Otsumi T, Uyama K, Otori T. The influence of target blur on perimetric threshold values in automated light-sensitive perimetry and flicker perimetry. In: Wall M, Heijl A, eds. Perimetry Update. Amsterdam/New York: Kugler Publishers; 1997:191-200.
14. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:648-656.
15. Hudson C, Wild JM, O'Neill EC. Fatigue effects during a single session of automated static threshold perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:268-280.
16. Heijl A, Drance SM. Changes in differential threshold in patients with glaucoma during prolonged perimetry. Br J Ophthalmol. 1983;67:512-516.
17. Adams CW, Bullimore MA, Wall M, Fingeret M, Johnson CA. Normal aging effects for frequency doubling technology perimetry. Optom Vis Sci. 1999;76:582-587.
18. Anderson AJ, Johnson CA. Effect of dichoptic adaptation on frequency-doubling perimetry. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79:88-92.
19. Gilchrist J, Pardhan S. Binocular contrast detection with unequal monocular illuminance. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1987;7:373-377.
20. Gilchrist J, McIver C. Fechner's paradox in binocular contrast sensitivity. Vision Res. 1985;25:609-613.
21. Barlow HB. Dark and light adaption: psychophysics. In: Jameson D, Hurvich LM, eds. Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Berlin: Springer; 1972:1-28.