Appearance of the frequency doubling stimulus in normal subjects and patients with glaucoma

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 1111-1116

  McKendrick, Allison M ^a,b   Anderson, Andrew J ^a   Johnson, Chris A ^a   Fortune, Brad ^a  

^a DEVERS EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FREQUENCY DOUBLING TECHNOLOGY PERIMETRY; GLAUCOMA; GRATING; HUMAN; PERIMETRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL THRESHOLD;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PERIMETRY; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0037334799     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.01-1251     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Maddess T, Henry GH. Performance of nonlinear visual units in ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci. 1992;7:371-383.
2. Johnson CA, Samuels SJ. Screening for glaucomatous visual field loss with frequency doubling perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997;38:413-425.
3. Kelly DH. Frequency doubling in visual responses. J Opt Soc Am. 1966;56:1628-1633.
4. Kelly DH. Nonlinear visual responses to flickering sinusoidal gratings. J Opt Soc Am. 1981;71:1051-1055.
5. Fujimoto N, Adachi-Usami E. Frequency doubling perimetry in resolved optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2558-2560.
6. Chauhan BC, Johnson CA. Test-retest variability of frequencydoubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40: 648-656.
7. Cello KE, Nelson-Quigg JM, Johnson CA. Frequency doubling technology perimetry for detection of glaucomatous field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;129:314-322.
8. Spry PGD, Johnson CA, McKendrick AM, Turpin A. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency doubling technology perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42: 1404-1410.
9. Parker A. The effects of temporal modulation on the perceived spatial structure of sine-wave gratings. Perception. 1983;12:663-682.
10. Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Weinreb RN, Dobkins KR. Is the frequency doubling illusion visible down to contrast threshold [ARVO Abstract]? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(4):S842. Abstract nr 4436.
11. Kulikowski JJ. Apparent fineness of briefly presented gratings: balance between movement and pattern channels. Vision Res. 1975;15:673-680.
12. Richards W, Felton TB. Spatial frequency doubling: retinal or central? Vision Res. 1973;13:2129-2137.
13. Flood T, Flanagan JG. The influence of detection versus resolution threshold criteria in frequency doubling perimetry (Abstract). Optom Vis Sci. 1998;75:31.
14. Thibos LN, Walsh DJ, Cheney FE. Vision beyond the resolution limit: aliasing in the periphery. Vision Res. 1987;27:2193-2197.
15. Appelle S. Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation. Psychol Bull. 1972;78:266-278.
16. Wetherill G, Levitt H. Sequential estimation of points on a psychometric function. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1965;18:1-10.
17. Turpin A, McKendrick AM, Johnson CA, Vingrys AJ. Performance of efficient test procedures for frequency-doubling technology perimetry in normal and glaucomatous eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:709-715.
18. Kutzko KE, Brito CF, Wall M. Effect of instructions on conventional automated perimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2006-2013.
19. Georgeson MA. Spatial frequency analysis in early visual processing. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B. 1980;290:11-22.
20. Georgeson MA. Apparent spatial frequency and contrast of gratings: separate effects of contrast and duration. Vision Res. 1985;25:1721-1727.
21. Davis ET, Yager D, Jones BJ. Comparison of perceived spatial frequency between the fovea and the periphery. J Opt Soc Am A. 1987;4:1606-1611.
22. Thompson P, Murphy BJ. Adaptation to a "spatial frequency doubled" stimulus. Perception. 1980;9:523-528.
23. Marran L, Davis ET. The effects of temporal modulation and spatial location on the perceived spatial frequency of visual patterns. Percept Psychophys. 1990;47:449-456.