Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services: Lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, part 2

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 58, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1188-1197

  Urquhart, Christine ^a   Rowley, Jennifer ^b  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONDITION MONITORING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STUDENTS;

DIGITAL INFORMATION SOURCES; INFORMATION RESOURCE DESIGN; JOINT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PEDAGOGY;

INFORMATION SERVICES;

EID: 34250158777     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20562     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. ACRL (Association of College and Research Libraries). (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago: ACRL. Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://www.ala.org/ala/acrl/acrlstandards/ informationliteracycompetency.htm
2. Banwell, L., Ray, K., Coulson, G., Urquhurt, C., Lonsdale, R., Armstrong, C., et al. (2004). Providing access to electronic information resources in further education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(5), 607-616.
3. Barry, C.A. (1997). Information skills for an electronic world: Training docloral research students. Journal of Information Science. 23(3), 225-238.
4. Becker, N.J. (2003). Google in perspective: Understanding and enhancing student search skills. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 9(1), 84-100.
5. Big Blue Project. (2002). The Big Blue Project: Information skills for students. Final report. Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.library.mmu.ac. uk/bigblue/finalreport.html
6. Brettle, A. (2003). Information skills training: A systematic review of the literature. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 20(Supplement 1), 3-9.
7. Colvin, J., & Keene, J. (2004). Supporting undergraduate learning through the collaborative promotion of e-journals by library and academic departments, Information Research, 9(2), http://informationr.net/ir/9-2/ paper173.html
8. Coulson, G., & Banwell, L. (2004). The impact of the JUBILEE Toolkit in institutions. Vine, 34(4), 154-160.
9. Dalgleish, A., & Hall, R. (2000). Uses and perceptions of the World Wide Web in an information-seeking environment. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 32(3), 104-116.
10. Davis, P.M. (2003). Tragedy of the commons revisited: Librarians, publishers, faculty and demise of a public resource. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(4), 547-562.
11. DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
12. Drabenstott, K.M. (2003). Do nondomain experts enlist the strategies of domain experts? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(9), 836-854.
13. Entwistle, N. (2003). Concepts and conceptual frameworks underpinning the ETL project. Occasional Report 3. ETL (Enhancing Teaching-Learning Environments in Undergraduate Courses) project. Edinburgh, Scotland: ETL Project, University of Edinburgh.
14. EPIC. (2004). The Electronic Publishing Initiative at Columbia (EPIC) online survey of college students: Executive summary. Columbia University, OH. Retrieved from www.epic.columbia.edu/eval/eval04frame.html
15. Eskola, E. (1999). University students' information seeking behaviour in a changing learning environment. How are students' information needs, seeking and use affected by new teaching methods? Information Research, 4(2). Retrieved March 5, 2006, from http://informationr.net/ir/4-2/isic/eskola.html
16. Eskola, E. (2005). Information literacy of medical students studying in the problem-based and traditional curriculum. Information Research, 10(2), Paper 221. Retrieved March 5, 2006, from http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper221.htm
17. Foster, A. (2004). A nonlinear model of information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 228-237.
18. Friedlander, A. (2002). Dimensions and use of the scholarly information environment: Introduction to a data set. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources.
19. Given, L.M. (2002). The academic and the everyday: Investigating the overlap in mature undergraduates' information-seeking behaviours. Library and Information Science Research, 24(1), 17-29.
20. Healy, L.W., Dagar, L., & Wilkie, K.M. (2002). Custom report prepared for the Digital Library. Federation/Council on Library and Information Resources. Burlingame, CA: Outsell.
21. IMS Global Learning Consortium, Inc. (2001). IMS Learning Resource Meta-Data Information Model Version 1.2.1 final specification, Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.imsglobal.org/metadata/index.html
22. Järvelin, K., & Ingwersen, P. (2004). Information seeking research needs extension towards tasks and technology. Information Research, 10(1), Paper 212, retrieved May 12, 2006 from http://InformationR.net/ir/10-1/ paper212.html
23. JUSTEIS Project. (2004). JUSTEIS project (JISC Usage Surveys: Trends in Electronic Information Services) Retrieved March 5, 2006, from http://www.justeis.info; also http://users.aber.ac.uk/cju
24. Kerins, G., Madden, R., & Fulton, C. (2004). Information seeking and students studying for professional careers: The case of engineering and law students in Ireland. Information Research 10(1), Paper 208. Retrieved March 5, 2006, from http://Informationr.net/ir.10-1/paper208.html
25. Kling, R., & McKim, G. (2000). Not just a matter of time: Field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 51(14), 1306-1320.
26. Kuhlthau, C.C. (1991). Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user's perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371.
27. Liu, Z., & Yang, Z.Y. (2004). Factors affecting distance-education graduate students' use of information sources: A user study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(1), 24-35.
28. Martin, S. (2003). Impact of a graduate entry programme on a medical school library service. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 20(1), 42-49.
29. Newman, M. (2003). A pilot systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of problem based learning on behalf of the Campbell Collaboration Group. Retrieved from http://www.hebes.mdx.ac.uk/teaching/Research/PEPBL/PSR- PBL.pdf
30. Pidd, M. (2003). Tools for thinking (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.
31. Rice, R.E., McCreadie, M., & Chang, S.-J.L. (2001). Accessing and browsing information and communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
32. Rowley, J., & Urquhart, C. (2007). Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services: Lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation, part 1. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(8), 1162-1174.
33. Rowley, J., Urquhart, C., Lonsdale, R., & Banwell, L. (2002). User behaviour in relation to EIS within the UK HE Academic Community. Journal of Educational Media, 27(3), 107-122.
34. Rowley, J., Ray, K., Proud, D., Banwell, L., Spink, S., Thomas, R., et al. (2004). Using action research to investigate the use of digital information resources in further education. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(3), 235-246.
35. Sihvonen, A., & Vakkari, P. (2004). Subject knowledge improves interactive query expansion assisted by a thesaurus. Journal of Documentation, 60(6), 673-690.
36. Silverman, D. (1993). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.
37. Talja, S., & Maula, H. (2003). Reasons for the use and non-use of electronic journals and databases. Journal of Documentation, 59(6), 673-691.
38. Urquhart, C. (1999). Using vignettes to diagnose information seeking strategies: Opportunities and possible problems for information use studies of health professionals. In T.D. Wilson & D.K. Allen (Eds.), Exploring the contexts of information behaviour: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Information Needs, Seeking and Use in Different Contexts (pp. 277-289), August 1998, Sheffield, England. London: Taylor Graham.
39. Urquhart, C., Lonsdale, R., Thomas, R., Spink, S., Yeoman, A., Armstrong, C., et al. (2003). Uptake and use of electronic information services: Trends in UK higher education from the JUSTEIS project. Program, 37(3), 168-180.
40. Urquhart, C., Spink, S., Thomas, R., Yeoman, A., Turner, J., Durbin, J., et al. (2004). Evaluating the development of virtual learning environments in higher and further education. In J. Cook (Ed.), Blue skies and pragmatism: Learning technologies for the next decade. Research proceedings of the 11th Association for Learning Technology Conference (pp. 157-169), University of Exeter, Devon, England. Oxford, England: Association for Learning Technology.
41. Valentine, B. (1993). Undergraduate research behaviour: Using focus groups to generate theory. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 19(5), 300-304.
42. Whitmire, E. (2002). Disciplinary differences and undergraduates' information-seeking behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(8), 631-638.
43. Whitmire, E. (2003). Epistemological beliefs and the information-seeking behavior of undergraduates. Library & Information Science Research, 25, 127-142.
44. Wildemuth, B.M. (2004). The effects of domain knowledge on search tactic formulation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(3), 246-258.
45. Wilson, T.D., & Walsh, C. (1996). Information behaviour: An inter-disciplinary perspective. A report to the British Library R&D Department on a review of the literature (British Library R&D Report No. 10). Boston Spa, Wetherby: British Library Document Supply Centre.
46. Zhang, X., Anghelescu, H.G.B., & Yuan, X. (2005). Domain knowledge, search behaviour, and search effectiveness of engineering students: An exploratory study. Information Research, 10(2), Paper 217. Retrieved March 5, 2006, from http://informationr.net/ir/10-2/paper217.html