On the application-files design for the study of competence and double standards

Sociological Focus

Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 115-132

  Foschi, Martha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250004380     PISSN: 00380237     EISSN: 21621128     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00380237.2006.10571280     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Balkwell, James W., Joseph Berger, Murray Webster, Jr., Max Nelson-Kilger, and Jackie Cashen. 1992. “Processing Status Information: Some Tests of Competing Theoretical Arguments.” Advances in Group Processes 9:1-20.
2. Bartol, Kathryn M. 1999. “Gender Influences on Performance Evaluations.” Pp. 165-178 in Handbook of Gender and Work, edited by Gary N. Powell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Berger, Joseph, M. Hamit Fisek, Robert Z. Norman, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. 1977. Status Characteristics and Social Interaction: An Expectation-States Approach. New York, NY: Elsevier.
4. Berger, Joseph, Cecilia L. Ridgeway, M. Hamit Fisek, and Robert Z. Norman. 1998. “The Legitimation and Delegitimation of Power and Prestige Orders.” American Sociological Review 63:379-405.
5. Berger, Joseph, Susan J. Rosenholtz, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. 1980. “Status Organizing Processes.” Annual Review of Sociology 6:479-508.
6. Berger, Joseph, David G. Wagner, and Morris Zelditch, Jr. 1985. “Introduction: Expectation States Theory— Review and Assessment.” Pp. 1-72 in Status, Rewards, and Influence: How Expectations Organize Behavior, edited by Joseph Berger and Morris Zelditch, Jr. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7. Berger, Joseph, Morris Zelditch, Jr., and BoAnderson. 1972. “Introduction.” Pp. ix-xxii in Stxiological Theories in Progress, Vol. 2, edited by Joseph Berger, Morris Zelditch, Jr., and Bo Anderson. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
8. Biernat, Monica and Kathleen Fuegen. 2001. “Shifting Standards and the Evaluation of Competence: Complexity in Gender-Based Judgment and Decision Making.” Journal of Social Issues 57:707-724.
9. Biernat, Monica and Diane Kobrynowicz. 1997. “Gender- and Race-Based Standards for Competence: Lower Minimum Standards but Higher Ability Standards for Devalued Groups “ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 72:544-557.
10. Biernat, Monica, Theresa K. Vescio, and Melvin Manis. 1998. “Judging and Behaving Toward Members of Stereotyped Groups: A Shifting Standards Perspective.” Pp. 151-175 in Intergroup Cognition and Intergroup Behavior, edited by Constantine Sedikides, John Schopler, and Chester A. Insko. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Cohen, Bernard P. 1989. Developing Sociological Knowledge: Theory and Method. 2d ed. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall.
12. Correll, Shelley J. 2004. “Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status and Emerging Career Aspirations.” American Sociological Review 69:93-113.
13. Correll, Shelley and Cecilia L. Ridgeway. 2003. “Expectation States Theory.” Pp. 29-51 in Handbook of Social Psychology, edited by John Delamater. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
14. Foddy, Margaret and Michael Smithson. 1989. “Fuzzy Sets and Double Standards: Modeling the Process of Ability Inference.” Pp. 73-99 in Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations, edited by Joseph Berger, Morris Zelditch, Jr., and Bo Anderson. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15. Foschi, Martha. 1989. “Status Characteristics, Standards, and Attributions.” Pp. 58-72 in Sociological Theories in Progress: New Formulations, edited by Joseph Berger, Morris Zelditch, Jr., and Bo Anderson. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16. Foschi, Martha. 1996. “Double Standards in the Evaluation of Men and Women.” Social Psychology Quarterly 59:237-254.
17. Foschi, Martha. 1997. “On Scope Conditions.” Small Group Research 28:535-555.
18. Foschi, Martha. 2000. “Double Standards for Competence: Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:21¬42.
19. Foschi, Martha. 2004. “Blocking the Use of Gender-Based Double Standards for Competence.” Pp. 51-55 in Gender and Excellence in the Making (EUR 21222 Report], edited by Margo Brouns and Elisabetta Addis. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research.
20. Foschi, Martha and Margaret Foddy. 1988. “Standards, Performances, and the Formation of Self-Other Expectations.” Pp. 248-260 and 501-503 in Status Generalization: New Theory and Research, edited by Murray Webster, Jr. and Martha Foschi. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
21. Foschi, Martha, Larissa Lai, and Kirsten Sigerson. 1994. “Gender and Double Standards in the Assessment of Job Applicants.” Stxial Psychology Quarterly 57:326-339.
22. Foschi, Martha, Kirsten Sigerson, and Marie Lembesis. 1995. “Assessing Job Applicants: The Relative Effects of Gender, Academic Record, and Decision Type.” Small Group Research 26:328-352.
23. Foschi, Martha, G. Keith Warriner, and Stephen D. Hart. 1985. “Standards, Expectations, and Interpersonal Influence.” Social Psychology Quarterly 48:108-117.
24. Gerdes, Eugenia P. and Douglas M. Garber. 1983. “Sex Bias in Hiring: Effects of Job Demands and Applicant Competence.” Sex Roles 9:307-319.
25. Graves, Laura M. 1999. “Gender Bias in Interviewers’ Evaluations of Applicants: When and How Does it Occur?” Pp. 145-164 in Handbook of Gender and Work, edited by Gary N. Powell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26. Harvie, Kathrvn, Jane Marshall-McCaskey, and Lucy Johnston. 1998. “Gender-Based Biases in Occupational Hiring Decisions.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28:1698-1711.
27. Ilgen, Daniel R. and Margaret A. Youtz. 1990. “Factors Affecting the Evaluation and Development of Minorities in Organizations.” Pp. 261-291 in Performance Evaluation, Goal Setting, and Feedback, edited by Gerald R. Ferris and Kendrith M. Rowland. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.
28. Jackson, Lynne M., Victoria M. Esses, and ChristopherT. Burris. 2001. “Contemporary Sexism and Discrimination: The Importance of Respect for Men and Women.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27:48-61.
29. Li, Peter S. 2001. “The Market Worth of Immigrants’ Educational Credentials.” Canadian Public Policy 27:23-38.
30. Lucas, Jeffrey W. 2003. “Theory-Testing, Generalization, and the Problem of External Validity.” Sociological Theory 21:236-253.
31. Martin, Michael W. and Jane Sell. 1979. “The Role of the Experiment in the Social Sciences.” The Sociological Quarterly 20:581-590.
32. Meeker, Barbara F. and Robert K. Leik. 1995. “Experimentation in Sociological Social Psychology.” Pp. 629-649 in Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, edited by Karen S. Cook, Gary A. Fine, and James S. House. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
33. Miller, Dale T. and Deborah A. Prentice. 1996. “The Construction of Social Norms and Standards.” Pp. 799-829 in Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, edited by E. Tory Higgins and Arie W. Kruglanski. New York, NY: Guilford.
34. Mook, Douglas G. 1983. “In Defense of External Invalidity.” American Psychologist 38:379-387.
35. Moore, James C., Jr. 1968. “Status and Influence in Small Group Interactions.” Sociometry: 31:47-63.
36. Reskin, Barbara F. and Irene Padavic. 1999. “Sex, Race, and Ethnic Inequality in United States Workplaces.” Pp. 343-374 in Handbook of the Sociology of Gender, edited by Janet S. Chafetz. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
37. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2001a. “Gender, Status, and Leadership.” Journal of Social Issues 57:637-655.
38. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. 2001b. “Social Status and Group Structure.” Pp. 352-375 in Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, edited by Michael A. Hogg and R. Scott Tindale. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
39. Ridgeway, Cecilia L. and Joseph Berger. 1986. “Expectations, Legitimation, and Dominance Behavior in Task Groups.” American Sociological Review 51:603-617.
40. Roos, Patricia A. and Mary L. Gatta. 1999. “The Gender Gap in Earnings: Trends, Explanations and Prospects.” Pp. 95-123 in Handbook of Gender and Work, edited by Gary N. Powell. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Shelly, Robert K. 1998. “Some Developments in Expectation States Theory: Graduated Expectations.” Advances in Group Processes 15:41-57.
42. Shelly, Robert K. 2002. “How Scope and Initial Conditions Determine the Growth of Theory.” Pp. 115-130 in The Growth of Social Knowledge, edited by Jacek Szmatka, Michael Lovaglia, and Kinga Wysienska. Westport, CT: Praeger.
43. Singer, Benjamin D. 1996. “Towards a Sociology of Standards: Problems of a Criterial Society.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 21:203-221.
44. Steinpreis, Rhea E., Katie A. Anders, and Dawn Ritzke. 1999. “The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study.” Sex Roles 41:509-528.
45. Thye, Shane R. 2000. “Reliability in Experimental Sociology.” Social Forces 78:1277-1309.
46. Tootell, Geoffrey, Alison Bianchi, and Paul T. Munroe. 1998. “Understanding the Nature of Scope Conditions: Some Considerations and Consequences, Including Hybrid Theories as a Step Forward.” Advances in Group Processes 15:213-235.
47. Wagner, David G. and Joseph Berger. 2002. “Expectation States Theory: An Evolving Research Program.” Pp. 41-76 in New Directions in Contemporary Sociological Theory, edited by Joseph Berger and Morris Zelditch, Jr. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
48. Walker, Henry A. 2000. “Three Faces of Explanation: Rethinking the Theory Project.” Sociological Focus 33:41¬56.
49. Walker, Henry A. and Bernard P. Cohen. 1985. “Scope Statements: Imperatives for Evaluating Theories.” American Sociological Review 50:288-301.
50. Webster, Murray, Jr. and James E. Driskell, Jr. 1983. “Beauty as Status.” American Journal of Sociology 89:140-165.
51. Webster, Murray, Jr. and John B. Kervin. 1971. “Artificiality in Experimental Sociology.” Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 8:263-272.
52. Webster, Murray, Jr. and Barbara Sobieszek. 1974. Sources of Self-Evaluation: A Formal Theory of Significant Others and Social Influence. New York, NY: Wiley.
53. Zelditch, Morris, Jr. 1969. “Can You Really Study an Army in the Laboratory?” Pp. 528-539 in A Sociological Reader on Complex Organizations. 2d ed. edited by Amitai Etzioni. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
54. Zelditch, Morris, Jr. and Henry A. Walker. 1984. “Legitimacy and the Stability of Authority.” Advances in Group Processes 1:1-25.