On scope conditions

Small Group Research

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 535-555

  Foschi, Martha ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031487744     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496497284004     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Balkwell, J. W. (1991). Status characteristics and social interaction: An assessment of theoretical variants. Advances in Group Processes, 8, 135-176.
2. Balkwell, J. W., Berger, J., Webster, M. Jr., Nelson-Kilger, M., & Cashen, J. (1992). Processing status information: Some tests of competing theoretical arguments. Advances in Group Processes, 9, 1-20.
3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
4. Berger, J. (1992). Expectations, theory, and group processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55, 3-11.
5. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
6. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach. New York: Elsevier.
7. Berger, J., Wagner, D. G., & Zelditch, M. Jr. (1985). Introduction: Expectation states theory-review and assessment. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior (pp. 1-72). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Cohen, B. P. (1980). The conditional nature of scientific knowledge. In L. Freese (Ed.), Theoretical methods in sociology: Seven essays (pp. 71-110). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
9. Cohen, B P. (1989). Developing sociological knowledge: Theory and method (2nd ed.). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
10. Crundall, I., & Foddy, M. (1981). Vicarious exposure to a task as a basis of evaluative competence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 331-338.
11. Dornbusch, S. M., & Scott, W. R. (1975). Evaluation and the exercise of authority. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Driskell, J. E., & Mullen, B. (1990). Status, expectations, and behavior: A meta-analytic review and test of the theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 541-553.
13. Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Nelson-Kilger, M. (1992). Status characteristics and expectation states theory: A priori model parameters and test. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 16, 285-303.
14. Foschi, M. (1980). Theory, experimentation, and cross-cultural comparisons in social psychology. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 5, 91-102.
15. Foschi, M. (1996). Double standards in the evaluation of men and women. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 237-254.
16. Foschi, M., & Buchan, S. (1990). Ethnicity, gender, and perceptions of task competence. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 15, 1-18.
17. Foschi, M., Lai, L., & Sigerson, K. (1994). Gender and double standards in the assessment of job applicants. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 326-339.
18. Foschi, M., Sigerson, L., & Lembesis, M. (1995). Assessing job applicants: The relative effects of gender, academic record, and decision type. Small Group Research, 26, 328-352.
19. Foschi, M., Warriner, G. K., & Hart, S. D. (1985). Standards, expectations, and interpersonal influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 48, 108-117.
20. Freese, L. (1980). The problem of cumulative knowledge. In L. Freese (Ed.), Theoretical methods in sociology: Seven essays (pp. 13-69). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
21. Freese, L., & Cohen, B. P. (1973). Eliminating status generalization. Sociometry, 36, 177-193.
22. Gray, G., & Guppy, N. (1994). Successful surveys: Research methods and practice. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Canada.
23. Lovaglia, M. J. (1995). Power and status: Exchange, attribution, and expectation states. Small Group Research, 26, 400-426.
24. Markovsky, B. (1994). The structure of theories. In M. Foschi & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Group processes: Sociological analyses (pp. 3-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
25. Markovsky, B., Wilier, D., & Patton, T. (1988). Power relations in exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 53, 220-236.
26. Michener, H. A. (1992). Coalition anomalies in light of the central-union theory. Advances in Group Processes, 9, 65-88.
27. Miller-Loessi, K. (1995). Comparative social psychology: Cross-cultural and cross-national. In K. S. Cook, G. A. Fine, & J. S. House (Eds.), Sociological perspectives on social psychology (pp. 396-420). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
28. Moore, J. C. Jr. (1968). Status and influence in small group interaction. Sociometry, 31, 47-63.
29. Pugh, M. D., & Wahrman, R. (1983). Neutralizing sexism in mixed-sex groups: Do women have to be better than men? American Journal of Sociology, 88, 746-762.
30. Riches, P., & Foddy, M. (1989). Ethnic accent as a status cue. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 197-206.
31. Ridgeway, C. L. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70, 367-386.
32. Sell, J., & Martin, M. W. (1983). An acultural perspective on experimental social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 345-350.
33. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Tallman, I., Gray, L., & Leik, R. K. (1991). Decision, dependency, and commitment: An exchange-based theory of group formation. Advances in Group Processes, 8, 227-257.
35. Wagner, D. G. (1984). The growth of sociological theories. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
36. Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1993). Status characteristics theory. The growth of a program. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 23-63, 454-463). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
37. Wagner, D. G., Ford, R. S., & Ford, T. W. (1986). Can gender inequalities be reduced? American Sociological Review, 51, 47-61.
38. Walker, H. A., & Cohen, B. P. (1985). Scope statements: Imperatives for evaluating theory. American Sociological Review, 50, 288-301.
39. Webster, M. Jr., & Driskell, J. E. Jr. (1978). Status generalization: A review and some new data. American Sociological Review, 43, 220-236.
40. Webster, M. Jr., & Driskell, J. E. Jr. (1983). Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology, 89, 140-165.
41. Webster, M. Jr., & Hysom, S. (1995, August). Sexual orientation as status. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Washington, DC.
42. Webster, M. Jr., & Kervin, J. B. (1971). Artificiality in experimental sociology. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 8, 263-272.
43. Webster, M. Jr., & Sobieszek, B. (1974). Sources of self-evaluation: A formal theory of significant others and social influence. New York: John Wiley.
44. Wiley, M. G. (1986). How expectation states organize theory construction. Contemporary Sociology, 15, 338-341.
45. Willer, D., & Webster, M. Jr. (1970). Theoretical concepts and observables. American Sociological Review, 35, 748-757.
46. Zelditch, M. Jr. (1969). Can you really study an army in the laboratory? In A. Etzioni (Ed.), A sociological reader on complex organizations (2nd ed., pp. 528-539). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
47. Zeller, R. A., & Warnecke, R. B. (1973). The utility of intervening constructs in experiments. Sociological Methods and Research, 2, 85-110.