It's more than content: Expanding the conception of early learning standards

Early Childhood Research and Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Brown, Christopher P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Mail Stop D5700 ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249913745     PISSN: 15245039     EISSN: 15245039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey, & Berliner, David C. (2003). Re-analysis of NAEP math and reading scores in states with and without high-stakes tests: Response to Rosenshine. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11. Retrieved November 20, 2003, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n25/
2. Argyris, Chris, & Schön, Donald A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Bodrova, Elena, & Leong, Deborah J. (2005). Uniquely preschool. Educational Leadership, 63(1), 44-47.
4. Bodrova, Elena; Leong, Deborah; & Shore, Rima. (2004, March). Child outcome standards in prek programs: What are standards; what is needed to make them work? Preschool Policy Matters Issue, 5. Retrieved September 3, 2004, from http://nieer.org/resources/Policybriefs/5.pdf
5. Bowman, Barbara T.; Donovan, M. Suzanne; & Burns, M. Susan (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Bransford, John D.; Brown, Ann L.; & Cocking, Rodney R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Exp. ed.). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Bredekamp, Sue. (Ed.). (1987). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
8. Bredekamp, Sue, & Copple, Carol (Eds.). (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
9. Bredekamp, Sue, & Rosegrant, Teresa (Eds.). (1992). Reaching potentials: Appropriate curriculum and assessment for young children (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
10. Bredekamp, Sue, & Rosegrant, Teresa (Eds.). (1995). Reaching potentials: Transforming early childhood curriculum and assessment (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
11. Bronfenbrenner, Urie. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Cannella, Gaile S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution. New York: P. Lang.
13. Cress, Susan W. (2004). Assessing standards in the "real" kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(2), 95-99.
14. Deleuze, Gilles, & Guattari, Félix. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). London: Athlone Press.
15. Denzin, Norman K., & Lincoln, Yvonna S. (2003). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (2nd ed., pp. 1-45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Dodge, Diane Trister; Colker, Laura; & Heroman, Cate. (2002). The creative curriculum for preschool (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.
17. Early Learning Standards Steering Committee (ELSSC). (2003, October). Wisconsin model early learning standards. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. Retrieved October 25, 2006, from http://dpi.wi.gov/ fscp/pdf/ecelstan.pdf
18. Elmore, Richard F. (2001, April). Psychiatrists and lightbulbs: Educational accountability and the problem of capacity. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
19. Emerson, Robert M.; Fretz, Rachel I.; & Shaw, Linda L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Erickson, Frederick. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In Merlin C. Whittrock (Ed.), Handbook on research on teaching (pp. 119-161). Chicago: Macmillan.
21. Fendler, Lynn. (2001). Educating flexible souls: The construction of subjectivity through developmentallty and interaction. In Kenneth Hultqvist & Gunilla Dahlberg (Eds.), Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 119-142). New York: Routledge.
22. Firestone, William A.; Schorr, Roberta Y.; & Monfils, Lora F. (2004). The ambiguity of teaching to the test: Standards, assessment, and educational reform. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Fleer, Marilyn. (2005). Developmental fossils-unearthing the artifacts of early childhood education: The reification of child development'. Australian Journal of Early Childhood. Retrieved July 12, 2005, from http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.orq.au/aiec 0502 developmental fossils, htm
24. Glod, Maria. (2006, June 1). Kaine panel to push for pre-k for all 4-year-olds: Goal is universal access by the end of his term. Retrieved June 1, 2006, from http://www.washinqtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2006/05/31/ AR2006053100008.html?sub=AR
25. Goldstein, Lisa S. (1999). The relational zone: The role of caring relationships in the coconstruction of mind. American Educational Research Journal, 36(3), 647-673.
26. Graue, M. Elizabeth, & Walsh, Daniel J. (1998). Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
27. Greenfield, Patricia Marks; Quiroz, Blanca; & Raeff, Catherine. (2000). Cross-cultural conflict and harmony in the social construction of the child. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 87, 93-108.
28. Haglund, Jill. (2005). Development of the Wisconsin model early learning standards: A historical view focusing on the Department of Public Instruction involvement Retrieved January 19, 2006, from http://www.collaboratinqpartners.com/docs/WMELS historv.pdf
29. Kagan, Sharon Lynn; Moore, Evelyn; & Bredekamp, Sue (Eds.). (1995). Reconsidering children's early learning and development: Toward common views and vocabulary. Washington, DC: National Education Goals Panel. Retrieved January 19, 2006, from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/ data/ericdocs2/ content_storage_01/0000000b/80/24/e8/8d.pdf
30. Kagan, Sharon L., & Scott-Little, Catherine. (2004). Early learning standards: Changing the parlance and practice of early childhood education? Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 388-396.
31. Kauerz, Kristie. (2006, January). Ladders of learning: Fighting fade-out by advancing pk-3 alignment (Issue Brief #2). Retrieved October 25, 2006, from http://www.newamerica.net/files/ archive/Doc_File 2826_1.pdf
32. Katz, Lilian G. (1996). Child development knowledge and teacher preparation: Confronting assumptions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 11(2), 135-146.
33. Kendall, John S. (2003). Setting standards in early childhood education. Educational Leadership, 60(7), 64-68.
34. Kessler, Shirley A., & Swadener, Beth Blue (Eds.). (1992). Reconceptualizing the early childhood curriculum: Beginning the dialogue. New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Kruse, Tricia S. (2005). Building a High/Scope program: Full-day preschool programs. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
36. Lakoff, George. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. Leahy, Siobhan; Lyon, Christine; Thompson, Marnie; & Wiliam, Dylan. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 19-24.
38. Lubeck, Sally. (1998). Is developmentally appropriate practice for everyone? Childhood Education, 74(5), 283-292.
39. MacNaughton, Glenda. (2004). The politics of logic in early childhood research: A case of the brain, hard facts, trees, and rhizomes. Australian Educational Researcher, 31(3), 87-104.
40. Mansfield, Nick. (2000). Subjectivity: Theories of the self from Freud to Haraway. Sydney, Australia: Allen and Unwin.
41. National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education (2002). Early learning standards: Creating conditions for success. Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://naecs.crc.uiuc.edu/position/ creating_conditions.pdf
42. National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Association of Early Childhood Specialists in State Departments of Education (2003). Where we stand on early learning standards. Retrieved March 20, 2004, from http://www.naeyc.org/about/positions/pdf/ elstandardsstand.pdf
43. Neuman, Susan B., & Roskos, Kathleen. (2005). The state of pre-kindergarten standards. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20(20), 125-145.
44. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425. (2002). Retrieved January 19, 2007, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/ esea02/107-110.pdf
45. O'Day, Jennifer A. (2002). Complexity, accountability, and school improvement. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 293-329.
46. Powers, Jeanne M. (2004). High-stakes accountability and equity: Using evidence from California's public schools accountability act to address the issues in Williams v. State of California. American Educational Research Journal, 41(A), 763-795.
47. Rogoff, Barbara. (2003). The cultural nature of human development Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Scott-Little, Catherine; Kagan, Sharon Lynn; & Frelow, Victoria Stebbins. (2003). Creating the conditions for success with early learning standards: Results from a national study of state-level standards for learning prior to kindergarten. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 5. Retrieved March 12, 2004, from http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v5n2/little.html
49. Shepard, Lorrie A.; Taylor, Grace A.; & Kagan, Sharon L. (1996). Trends in early childhood assessment policies and practices. Los Angeles: Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
50. Shonkoff, Jack P., & Phillips, Deborah A. (Eds.). (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early child development Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
51. Silin, Jonathan G., & Lippman, Carol. (2003). Putting the children first: The changing face of Newark's public schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
52. Stake, Robert E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Stake, Robert E. (2000). Case studies. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435-454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Stipek, Deborah. (2002). Motivation to learn: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
55. Stipek, Deborah. (2006). No Child Left Behind comes to preschool. Elementary School Journal, 106 (5),455-465.
56. Strauss, Anselm L. (1996). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Weiss, Carol Hirschon. (1995). Nothing as practical as a good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In James P. Connell, Anne C. Kubisch, Lisbeth B. Schorr, & Carol H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 65-92). Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
58. Wilson, Suzanne M. (2003). California dreaming: Reforming mathematics education. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59. Wolcott, Harry F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis, and interpretation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.