Fostering scholarly productivity through academic and internship research training environments

Training and Education in Professional Psychology

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 135-146

  Szymanski, Dawn M ^a,f   Ozegovic, Jelena Jovanovic ^b   Phillips, Julia C ^c   Briggs Phillips, Melissa ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b Robert Morris College   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^d OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e University of Tennessee ^*

^f UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Internship; Research interest; Research outcome expectations; Research self efficacy; Research training environments; Scientist practitioner

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249816835     PISSN: 19313918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1931-3918.1.2.135     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke (1997). Amos 4.0 for Windows. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters.
2. Baggozi, R. B., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach to representing multifaceted personality variables: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35-76.
3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
5. Bentler, P. M., & Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 78-117.
6. Bieschke, K. J. (2000). Factor structure of the Research Outcome Expectations Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 8, 303-313.
7. Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Herbert, J. T. (1995). Research interest among rehabilitation doctoral students. Rehabilitation Education, 9, 51-66.
8. Bieschke, K. J. (2006). Research self-efficacy beliefs and research outcome expectations: Implications for developing scientifically minded psychologists. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 77-91.
9. Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J. (1994). Interest in Research Questionnaire. Unpublished scale.
10. Bishop, R. M., & Bieschke, K. J. (1998). Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 45, 182-188.
11. Brems, C., Johnson, M. E., & Gallucci, P. (1996). Publication productivity of clinical and counseling psychologists. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 723-725.
12. Bryant, F. B., & Yarnold, P. R. (1995). Principal components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In L. G. Grimm & P. R. Yarnold (Eds.), Reading and understanding multivariate statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Byrne, B. M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and programming for confirmatory factor analytic models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. Cherry, D. K., Messenger, L. C., & Jacoby, A. M. (2000). An examination of training model out-comes in clinical psychology programs. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 562-568.
15. Gelso, C. J. (1993). On the making of a scientist-practitioner: A theory of research training in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 24, 468-476.
16. Gelso, C. J. (2000). Scientific training and scholarly productivity: The person, the training environment and their interaction. In S. D. Brown and R. W. Lent (Eds.), Handbook of Counseling Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 109-139). New York: Wiley.
17. Gelso, C. J., & Lent, R. W. (1997). The making of a scientist in applied psychology: An attribute by treatment conception. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 307-320.
18. Gelso, C. J., Mallinckrodt, B., & Judge, A. B. (1996). Research training environment, attitudes toward research, and research self-efficacy: The revised Research Training Environment Scale. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 304-322.
19. Hagstrom, A. H., & Gutierrez, P. M. (1998). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Multi-Attitude Suicide Tendency Scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 20, 173-186.
20. Holland, J. L. (1985). Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI): Professional manual-1985 ed. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
21. Kahn, J. H. (2001). Predicting the scholarly activity of counseling psychology students: A refinement and extension. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 344-354.
22. Kahn, J. H., & Gelso, C. J. (1997). Factor structure of the Research Training Environment Scale Revised: Implications for research training in applied psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 22-37.
23. Kahn, J. H., & Miller, S. A. (2000). Measuring global perceptions of the research training environment using a short form of the RTES-R. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33, 103-119.
24. Kahn, J. H., & Scott, N. A. (1997). Predictors of research productivity and science-related career goals among counseling psychology doctoral students. The Counseling Psychologist, 25, 38-67.
25. Krebs, P. J., Smither, J. W., & Hurley, R. B. (1991). Relationship of vocational personality and research training environment to research productivity of counseling psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 22, 362-367.
26. Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying theory of social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79-122.
27. Neimeyer, G. J., Saferstein, J., & Rice, K. G. (2005). Does the model matter? The relationship between science-practice emphasis and outcomes in academic training programs in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 635-654.
28. Phillips, J. C., & Russell, R. K. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 22, 628-641.
29. Phillips, J. C., Szymanski, D. M., Ozegovic, J. J., & Briggs, M. (2004). Preliminary examination and measurement of the internship research training environment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51, 240-248.
30. Quintana, S. M., & Maxwell, S. E. (1999). Implications of recent development in Structural Equation Modeling for Counseling Psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 27, 485-527.
31. Rodolfa, E. R., Kaslow, N. J., Stewart, A. E., Keilin, W. G., & Baker, J. (2005). Internship training: Do models really matter. Professional psychology: Research and practice, 36, 25-31.
32. Royalty, G. M., Gelso, C. J., Mallingckrodt, B., & Garrett, K. D. (1986). The environment and the student in counseling psychology: Does the research training environment influence graduate students' attitudes toward research? The Counseling Psychologist, 14, 9-30.
33. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
34. West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Wetter, D. W., Smith, S. S., Kenford, S. L., Jorenby, D. F., Fiore, M. C., Hurt, R. D., et al. (1994). Smoking outcome expectancies: Factor structure, predictive validity, and discriminant validity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 801-811.