CALL on hold: The delayed benefits of an online workbook on L2 vocabulary learning

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 153-171

  Zapata, Gabriela ^a   Sagarra, Nuria ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249684385     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588220701331352     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Abrams, Z. I. (2003). The effect of synchronous and asynchronous CMC on oral performance in German. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 157-167.
2. Allum, P. (2004). Evaluation of CALL: Initial vocabulary learning. ReCALL, 16, 488-501.
3. Arvan, L., & Musumeci, D. (2000). Instructor attitudes within the SCALE efficiency projects. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Network, 4. Retrieved 18 February 2006 from http://www.alnresearch.org/Data_Files/articles/ full_text/fs-arvan.htm
4. Au, T. K., & Glusman, M. (1990). The principle of mutual exclusivity in word learning: To honor or not to honor? Child Development, 61, 1474-1490.
5. Blake, R., & Delforge, A. M. (2006). Online language learning: The case of Spanish without walls. In R. Salaberry & B. A. Lafford (Eds.), The an of teaching Spanish: Second language acquisition from research to praxis (pp. 127-148).Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
6. Bonte, W. F. W. (1997). Vocabulaire Verwerving, Een vergelijking van twee methoden [Vocabulary learning. A comparison of two methods]. Unpublished master's thesis, Universiteit Leiden, The Netherlands.
7. Bybee, J. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Coada, J., Magoto, J., Hubbard, P., Graney, J., & Makhtari, K. (1993). High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers. In T. Huckin, M. Haynes, & J. Coady (Eds.), Second language reading and vocabulary learning (pp. 217-228). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
9. Chenoweth, N. A., & Murday, K. (2003). Measuring student learning in an online French Course. CALICO Journal, 20, 284-314.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
11. Collentine, J. (2000). Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge provided by user-behavior tracking technologies. Language Learning and Technology, 3, 44-57. Retrieved 20 February 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol3num2/collentine/index.html
12. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
13. Cubillos, J. (2000). Temas: Spanish for the global community. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
14. De Groot, A. M. B., & Van Hell, J. G. (2004). The learning of foreign language vocabulary. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 9-29). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. De la Fuente, M. J. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16, 47-81.
16. DeRidder, (2002). Visible or invisible links: Does highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension, and the reading process? Language Learning and Technology, 6, 123-146. Retrieved 20 February 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/DERIDDER/default.html
17. Dufour, M. J. (1997). Foreign language vocabulary acquisition: Two methods compared. Unpublished master's thesis, Universiteit Utrecht, Faculty of Letters, The Netherlands.
18. Felix, U. (2003). Language learning online: Deconstructing the myths. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 19, 118-138.
19. Gettys, S., Imhof, L. A., & Kautz, J. O. (2001). Computer-assisted reading: The effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 91-106.
20. Green, A., & Earnest Youngs, B. (2001). Using the web in elementary French and German courses: Quantitative and qualitative study results. CALICO Journal, 19, 89-123.
21. Groot, P. J. M. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4, pp. 60-81. Retrieved 20 February 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/groot/default.html
22. Janssen, A. E. P. (1996). CAVOCA. Computer-assisted vocabulary acquisition. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Utrecht, Faculty of Arts, The Netherlands.
23. Jung, U. O. H. (2005a). An international bibliography of computer assisted language learning: Sixth installment. System, 33, 135-185.
24. Jung, U. O. H. (2005b). CALL: past, present and future: A bibliometric approach. ReCALL, 17, 4-17.
25. Kroll, J., & Sunderman, G. (2003). Cognitive processes in second language learners and bilinguals: The development of lexical and conceptual representations. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), Handbook of SLA (pp. 104-129). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
26. Lomicka, L. (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension on-line. Language Learning and Technology, 1, 41-50. Retrieved February 18, 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num2/article2/default. html
27. Meara, P. (1983). Vocabulary in a second language. Specialized Bibliography, 3, London: CILT.
28. Mecartty, F. H. (2000). Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish. Applied Language Learning, 11, 323-348. Retrieved 15 March 2006 from http://www.dliflc.edu/Academics/academic_materials/all/ALLissues/ allmilled11twofeb.pdf
29. Nagata, N. (1996). Computer vs. workbook instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO Journal, 14, 53-75.
30. Nagata, N. (1998a). Input vs. output practice in educational software for second language acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 1, 23-40. Retrieved 20 February 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol1num2/article1/
31. Nagata, N. (1998b). The relative effectiveness of production and comprehension practice in second language acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 11, 153-177.
32. Nagata, N. (2002). BANZAI: An application of natural language processing to web based language learning. CALICO Journal, 19, 583-599.
33. Nep, W. (1998). Computer ondersteunde woordverwerving in de tweede fase [Computer assisted vocabulary acquisition at higher levels]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Utrecht, IVLOS [Teacher training department], The Netherlands.
34. Payne, J. S., & Ross, B. M. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning and Technology, 9, 35 - 54. Retrieved February 20, 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/payne/ default.html
35. Pellettieri, J. (2000). Negotiation in Cyberspace: The role of chatting in the development of grammatical competence. In M. Warschauer & R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 59-86). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Sagarra, N. & Alba, M. (2006). The key is in the keyword: L2 vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 228-243.
37. Salaberry, M. R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 5-27.
38. Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 39-56.
39. Sanders, R. F. (2005). Redesigning introductory Spanish: Increased enrollment, online management, cost reduction, and effects on student learning. Foreign Language Annals, 38, 523-532.
40. Singh, H. (2003). Building effective blended learning programs. Educational Technology, 43(6), 51-54.
41. Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4, 82-119. Retrieved February 18, 2006 from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/ sotillo/default.html
42. Torlakovic, E., & Deugo, D. (2004). Application of a CALL system in the acquisition of adverbs in English. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 203-235.
43. Tozcu, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 473-495.
44. Twigg, C. A. (2003). Improving learning and reducing costs: New models for online learning. EDUCAUSE, 38 September-October, 28-38. Retrieved 20 February 2006 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0352.pdf
45. Wallen, E., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2005). The function of annotations in the comprehension of scientific texts: Cognitive load effects and the impact of verbal ability. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 59-72.
46. Zapata, G. C. (2004). Second language instructors and CALL: A multidisciplinary research framework. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 339-356.