Tissue-driven hypothesis with Gene Ontology (GO) analysis

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1088-1094

  Su, Zhixi ^a   Huang, Yong ^b   Gu, Xun ^a,b  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Expression divergence; Tissue duplicate distance; Tissue expression distance; Tissue sequence distance

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; GENE EXPRESSION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; TISSUE;

EXPRESSION DIVERGENCE; TISSUE DUPLICATE DISTANCE; TISSUE EXPRESSION DISTANCE; TISSUE SEQUENCE DISTANCE;

ONTOLOGY;

PROTEOME;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ANTIBODY SPECIFICITY; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOUSE; PROTEIN DATABASE; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATABASES, PROTEIN; EVOLUTION; HUMANS; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; ORGAN SPECIFICITY; PROTEOME; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 34249681774     PISSN: 00906964     EISSN: 15739686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10439-007-9269-y     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Ashburner, M., C. A. Ball, and J. A. Blake et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25:25-29, 2000.
2. Enard, W., P. Khaitovich, and J. Klose et al. Intra- and interspecific variation in primate gene expression patterns. Science 296:340-343, 2002.
3. Fay, J. C., H. L. McCullough, P. D. Sniegowski, and M. B. Eisen. Population genetic variation in gene expression is associated with phenotypic variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 5:R26.
4. Gilad, Y., A. Oshlack, and S. A. Rifkin. Natural selection on gene expression. Trends. Genet. 22:456-461, 2006.
5. Gilad, Y., A. Oshlack, and G. K. Smyth et al. Expression profiling in primates reveals a rapid evolution of human transcription factors. Nature 440:242-245, 2006.
6. Gu, Z., S. A. Rifkin, K. P. White, and W. H. Li. Duplicate genes increase gene expression diversity within and between species. Nat. Genet. 36:577-579, 2004.
7. Gu X. and Z. Su. Tissue-Driven Hypothesis of Genomic Evolution and Sequence-Expression Correlations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006 (Submitted).
8. Harris, M. A., J. Clark, and A. Ireland et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic. Acids Res. 32:D258-D261, 2004.
9. Jordan, I. K., L. Marino-Ramirez, and E. V. Koonin. Evolutionary significance of gene expression divergence. Gene 345:119-126, 2005.
10. Khaitovich, P., W. Enard, M. Lachmann, and S. Paabo. Evolution of primate gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:693-702, 2006.
11. Khaitovich, P., I. Hellmann, and W. Enard et al. Parallel patterns of evolution in the genomes and transcriptomes of humans and chimpanzees. Science 309:1850-1854, 2005.
12. Khaitovich, P., B. Muetzel, and X. She et al. Regional patterns of gene expression in human and chimpanzee brains. Genome Res. 14:1462-1473, 2004.
13. Khaitovich, P., K. Tang, and H. Franz et al. Positive selection on gene expression in the human brain. Curr. Biol. 16:R356-358, 2004.
14. Khaitovich, P., G. Weiss, and M. Lachmann et al. A neutral model of transcriptome evolution. PLoS Biol. 2:E132.
15. King, M. C. and A. C. Wilson. Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 188:107-116, 1975.
16. Lemos, B., B. R. Bettencourt, C. D. Meiklejohn, and D. L. Hartl. Evolution of proteins and gene expression levels are coupled in Drosophila and are independently associated with mRNA abundance, protein length, and number of protein-protein interactions. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22:1345-1354, 2005.
17. Liao, B. Y. and J. Zhang. Evolutionary conservation of expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23:530-540, 2006.
18. Nuzhdin, S. V., M. L. Wayne, K. L. Harmon, and L. M. McIntyre. Common pattern of evolution of gene expression level and protein sequence in Drosophila. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21:1308-1317, 2004.
19. Rifkin, S. A., D. Houle, J. Kim, and K. P. White. A mutation accumulation assay reveals a broad capacity for rapid evolution of gene expression. Nature 438:220-223, 2005.
20. Rifkin, S. A., J. Kim, and K. P. White. Evolution of gene expression in the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Nat. Genet. 33:138-144, 2003.
21. Su, A. I., M. P. Cooke, and K. A. Ching et al. Large-scale analysis of the human and mouse transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:4465-4470, 2002.
22. Su, A. I., T. Wiltshire, and S. Batalov et al. A gene atlas of the mouse and human protein-encoding transcriptomes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101:6062-6067, 2004.
23. Whitehead, A. and D. L. Crawford. Variation within and among species in gene expression: raw material for evolution. Mol. Ecol. 15:1197-1211, 2006.
24. Whitehead, A. and D. L. Crawford. Neutral and adaptive variation in gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 103:5425-5430, 2006.
25. Yanai, I., D. Graur, and R. Ophir. Incongruent expression profiles between human and mouse orthologous genes suggest widespread neutral evolution of transcription control. Omics. 8:15-24, 2004.