Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 713-720

  Murray, Richard F ^a   Sekuler, Allison B ^a,b   Bennett, Patrick J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; TIME;

DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035754997     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196208     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
2. BEHRMANN, M., ZEMEL, R. S., & MOZER, M. C. (1998). Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1011-1036.
3. BELLER, H. K. (1971). Priming: Effects of advance information on matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 87, 176-182.
4. BRUNO, N., BERTAMINI, M., & DOMINI, F. (1997). Amodal completion of partly occluded surfaces: Is there a mosaic stage? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1412-1426.
5. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
6. GERBINO, W., & SALMASO, D. (1985). Un'analisi processuale del completamento amodale [A rigorous analysis of amodal completion]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 12, 97-121.
7. GUTTMAN, S., & SEKULER, A. B. (2001). Visual completion: Spatial and temporal limits. Manuscript submitted for publication.
8. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
9. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Perceiving textures: Beyond filtering. Vision Research, 34, 151-162.
10. HELMHOLTZ, H. VON (1962). Treatise on physiological optics (3rd ed.; J. P. C. Southall, Trans.). New York: Dover. (Original work published 1910)
11. KANIZSA, G. (1979). Organization in vision: Essays on Gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
12. KANIZSA, G., & GERBINO, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception (pp. 167-190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. KELLMAN, P. J., & SHIPLEY, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141-221.
14. KELLMAN, P. J., & SPELKE, E. S. (1983). Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 483-524.
15. LORENCEAU, J., & SHIFFRAR, M. (1992). The influence of terminators on motion integration across space. Vision Research, 32, 263-273.
16. MEYER, G. E., & DOUGHERTY, T. J. (1990). Ambiguous fluidity and rigidity and diamonds that ooze. Perception, 19, 491-496.
17. MICHOTTE, A., THINÈS, G., COSTALL, A., & BUTTERWORTH, G. (1991). Michotte's experimental phenomenology of perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. NAKAYAMA, K., SHIMOJO, S., & SILVERMAN, G. H. (1989). Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception, 18, 55-68.
19. RATOOSH, P. (1949). On interposition as a cue for the perception of distance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 35, 257-259.
20. REGAN, D., & HAMSTRA, S. J. (1992). Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research, 32, 1845-1864.
21. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for low-level grouping. Psychological Review, 102, 101-130.
22. RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (1998). Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research, 38, 2489-2505.
23. RINGACH, D. L., & SHAPLEY, R. (1996). Spatial and temporal properties of illusory contours and amodal boundary completion. Vision Research, 36, 3037-3050.
24. ROSCH, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
25. SEKULER, A. B. (1994). Local and global minima in visual completion: Effects of symmetry and orientation. Perception, 23, 529-545.
26. SEKULER, A. B., & PALMER, S. E. (1992). Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 95-111.
27. SEKULER, A. B., PALMER, S. E., & FLYNN, C. (1994). Local and global processes in visual completion. Psychological Science, 5, 260-267.
28. SHORE, D. I., & ENNS, J. T. (1997). Shape completion time depends on the size of the occluded region. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 980-998.
29. SNOWDEN, R. J., & BRADDICK, O. J. (1989). The combination of motion signals over time. Vision Research, 29, 1621-1630.
30. STONE, L. S., BEUTTER, B. R., & LORENCEAU, J. (2000). Visual motion integration for perception and pursuit. Perception, 29, 771-787.
31. UTTAL, W. R., SPILLMANN, L., STÜRZEL, F., & SEKULER, A. B. (2000). Motion and shape in common fate. Vision Research, 40, 301-310.
32. WATAMANIUK, S. N. (1993). Ideal observer for discrimination of the global direction of dynamic random-dot stimuli. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 16-28.
33. WATAMANIUK, S. N., SEKULER, R., & WILLIAMS, D. W. (1989). Direction perception in complex dynamic displays: The integration of direction information. Vision Research, 29, 47-59.
34. WERTHEIMER, M. (1955). Laws of organization in perceptual forms. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp. 71-88). New York: Humanities Press. (Original work published 1923)