How do we track invisible objects?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 516-523

  Horowitz, Todd S ^a,b   Birnkrant, Randall S ^a   Fencsik, David E ^a,b   Tran, Linda ^c   Wolfe, Jeremy M ^a,b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c Charlestown High School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249721141     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193879     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. ALVAREZ, G. A., HOROWITZ, T. S., ARSENIO, H. C., DIMASE, J. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2005). Do multielement visual backing and visual search draw continuously on the same visual attention resources? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 643-667.
2. ASHIDA, H., SEIFFERT, A. E., & OSAKA, N. (2001). Inefficient visual search for second-order motion. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 18, 2255-2266.
3. AWH, E., & JONIDES, J. (1998). Spatial working memory and spatial selective attention. In R. Parasuraman (Ed.), The attentive brain. (pp. 353-380). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. AWH, E., JONIDES, J., & REUTER-LORENZ, P. A. (1998). Rehearsal in spatial working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 780-790.
5. BAHRAMI, B. (2003). Object property encoding and change blindness in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 10, 949-953.
6. BEX, P. J., & BAKER, C. L., JR. (1999). Motion perception over long interstimulus intervals. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 1066-1074.
7. BRAINARD, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 443-446.
8. DAVIS, G., & DRIVER, J. (1998). Kanizsa subjective figures can act as occluding surfaces at parallel stages of visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 169-184.
9. FENCSIK, D. E., KLIEGER, S. B., & HOROWITZ, T. S. (2006). The role of location and motion information in the tracking and recovery of moving objects. Manuscript submitted for publication.
10. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1992). Surfaces versus features in visual search. Nature, 359, 231-233.
11. HE, Z. J., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1993). Perceived surfece shape not features determines correspondence strength in apparent motion. Vision Research, 34, 2125-2135.
12. HOROWITZ, T. S., KLIEGER, S. B., FENCSIK, D. E., YANG, K. K., ALVAREZ, G. A., & WOLFE, J. M. (in press). Tracking unique objects. Perception & Psychophysics.
13. HOROWITZ, T. [S.], & TREISMAN, A. (1994). Attention and apparent motion. Spatial Vision, 8, 193-219.
14. KEANE, B. P., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (2006). Is motion extrapolation employed in multiple object tracking? Tracking as a low-level, nonpredictive function. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 346-368.
15. KLIEGER, S. B., HOROWITZ, T. S., & WOLFE, J. M. (2004). Is multiple object tracking colorblind? [Abstract] Journal of Vision, 4, 363a.
16. LEONARD, C., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (2003). Measuring the attentional demand of multiple object tracking (MOT) [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3, 582a.
17. LLERAS, A., RENSINK, R. A., & ENNS, J. T. (2005). Rapid resumption of interrupted visual search. Psychological Science, 16, 684-688.
18. MICHOTTE, A., THINES, G., & CRABBE, G. (1964). Les compliments amodaux des structures perceptives [Amodal complements of perceptual structures]. Louvain, Belgium: Institut de psychologie de l'Université de Louvain.
19. OGAWA, H., & YAGI, A. (2003). Priming effects in multiple object tracking: An implicit encoding based on global spatiotemporal information [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3, 339a.
20. OH, S.-H., & KIM, M.-S. (2004). The role of spatial working memory in visual search efficiency. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 275-281.
21. PALMER, S. E. (2002). Perceptual grouping: It's later than you think. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 101-106.
22. PALMER, S. E., NEFF, J., & BECK, D. (1996). Late influences on perceptual grouping: Amodal completion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 75-80.
23. PETERSIK, J. T. (1989). The two-process distinction in apparent motion. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 107-127.
24. PYLYSHYN, Z. [W.] (1994). Some primitive mechanisms of spatial attention. Cognition, 50, 363-384.
25. PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & LEONARD, C. (2003). Inhibition of nontargets during multiple object tracking (MOT) [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 3, 585a.
26. PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & STORM, R. W. (1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3, 179-197.
27. SCHOLL, B. J., & FEIGENSON, L. (2004). When out of sight is out of mind: Perceiving object persistence through occlusion vs. implosion [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4, 26a.
28. SCHOLL, B. J., & PYLYSHYN, Z. W. (1999). Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology, 38, 259-290.
29. SCHOLL, B. J., PYLYSHYN, Z. W., & FELDMAN, J. (2001). What is a visual object? Evidence from target merging in multiple object tracking. Cognition, 80, 159-177.
30. WOODMAN, G. F., & LUCK, S. J. (2004). Visual search is slowed when visuospatial working memory is occupied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 269-274.
31. YANTIS, S. (1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 295-340.
32. YIN, C., & THORNTON, I. M. (1999, May). Visual tracking across multiple streams of information. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Vision Research Conference, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.