Magnetic resonance angiography versus duplex arteriography in patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization: Which is the best replacement for contrast arteriography?

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 717-722

  Hingorani, Anil ^a,b   Ascher, Enrico ^a,b   Markevich, Natalia ^a,b   Kallakuri, Sreedhar ^a,b   Hou, Alex ^a,b   Schutzer, Richard ^a,b   Yorkovich, William ^a,b  

^a Maimonides Medical Center ^*

^b MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; IOHEXOL;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERIOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL CALCIFICATION; CHRONIC DISEASE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; DUPLEX ARTERIOGRAPHY; FEMOROPOPLITEAL VEIN; GANGRENE; HUMAN; ILIAC VEIN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFRAPOPLITEAL VEIN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG ISCHEMIA; LEG REVASCULARIZATION; LEG VEIN; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SKIN ULCER; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 1642546466     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.12.035     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Seldinger S. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography. Acta Radiol 1953;39:368-76.
2. Ascher E, Hingorani A, Markevich N, Costa T, Kallakuri S, Khanimoy Y. Lower extremity revascularization without preoperative contrast arteriography: experience with duplex ultrasound arterial mapping in 485 cases. Ann Vasc Surg 2002;16:108-14.
3. Mazzariol F, Ascher E, Hingorani A, Gunduz Y, Yorkovich W, Salles-Cunha S. Lower-extremity revascularisation without preoperative contrast arteriography in 185 cases: lessons learned with duplex ultrasound arterial mapping. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2000;19:509-15.
4. Ascher E, Mazzariol F, Hingorani A, Salles-Cunha S, Gade P. The use of duplex ultrasound arterial mapping as an alternative to conventional arteriography for primary and secondary infrapopliteal bypasses. Am J Surg 1999;178:162-5.
5. Mazzariol F, Ascher E, Salles-Cunha SX, Gade P, Hingorani A. Values and limitations of duplex ultrasonography as the sole imaging method of preoperative evaluation for popliteal and infrapopliteal bypasses. Ann Vasc Surg 1999;13:1-10.
6. Hingorani A, Ascher E. Dyeless vascular surgery. Cardiovasc Surg 2003;11:12-8.
7. Loewe C, Schoder M, Rand T, Hoffmann U, Sailer J, Kos T, et al. Peripheral vascular occlusive disease: evaluation with contrast-enhanced moving-bed MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography in 106 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:1013-21.
8. Eiberg JP, Lundorf E, Thomsen C, Schroeder TV. Peripheral vascular surgery and magnetic resonance arteriography: a review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2001;22:396-402.
9. Mast BA. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography for visualization of lower extremity arteries. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:261-4.
10. Pellerin M, Coquille F, Hubert M, Lagrange C, Piquois A, Scherrer A. Comparison between arteriography and magnetic resonance angiography in patients with leg peripheral arterial disease. J Radiol 2001;82(3 Pt 1):237-43.
11. Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2001;285:1338-45.
12. Ruehm SG, Hany TF, Pfammatter T, Schneider E, Ladd M, Debatin JF. Pelvic and lower extremity arterial imaging: diagnostic performance of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1127-35.
13. Kreitner KF, Kalden P, Neufang A, Duber C, Krummenauer F, Kustner E, et al. Diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease: prospective comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:171-9.
14. Sueyoshi E, Sakamoto I, Matsuoka Y, Ogawa Y, Hayashi H, Hashmi R, et al. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries: comparison of three-dimensional dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography and conventional angiography. Radiology 1999;210:683-8.
15. Levy MM, Baum RA, Carpenter JP. Endovascular surgery based solely on noninvasive preprocedural imaging. J Vasc Surg 1998;28:995-1003.
16. Hofmann WJ, Forstner R, Kofler B, Binder K, Ugurluoglu A, Magometschnigg H. Pedal artery imaging: a comparison of selective digital subtraction angiography, contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and duplex ultrasound. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;24:287-92.
17. Winchester PA, Lee HM, Khilnani NM, Wang Y, Trost DW, Bush HL Jr, et al. Comparison of two-dimensional MR digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremity with x-ray angiography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:891-9.
18. Hoch JR, Tullis MJ, Kennell TW, McDermott J, Acher CW, Turnipseed WD. Use of magnetic resonance angiography for the preoperative evaluation of patients with infrainguinal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:792-800.
19. Carpenter JP, Owen RS, Baum RA, Cope C, Barker CF, Berkowitz HD, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral runoff vessels. J Vasc Surg 1992;16:807-13.
20. Soule B, Hingorani A, Ascher E. Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and duplex ultrasound arterial mapping (DUAM) prior to infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2003;25:139-46.
21. Hofmann WJ, Forstner R. Pedal artery imaging using DSA, CE-MRA and duplex. Acta Chir Belg 2002;102:92-6.
22. Lundin P, Svensson A, Henriksen E, Jonason T, Forssell C, Backbro B, et al. Imaging of aortoiliac arterial disease: duplex ultrasound and MR angiography versus digital subtraction angiography. Acta Radiol 2000;41:125-32.
23. Leyendecker JR, Elsass KD, Johnson SP, Diffin DC, Cull DL, Light JT, et al. The role of infrapopliteal MR angiography in patients undergoing optimal contrast angiography for chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:545-51.
24. Cambria RP, Kaufman JA, L'Italien GJ, Gertler JP, LaMuraglia GM, Brewster DC, et al. Magnetic resonance angiography in the management of lower extremity arterial occlusive disease: a prospective study. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:380-9.
25. Snidow JJ, Harris VJ, Trerotola SO, Cikrit DF, Lalka SG, Buckwalter KA, et al. Interpretations and treatment decisions based on MR angiography versus conventional arteriography in symptomatic lower extremity ischemia. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1995;6:595-603.
26. Carpenter JP, Golden MA, Barker CF, Holland GA, Baum RA. The fate of bypass grafts to angiographically occult runoff vessels detected by magnetic resonance angiography. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:483-9.
27. Dorweiler B, Neufang A, Kreitner KF, Schmiedt W, Oelert H. Magnetic resonance angiography unmasks reliable target vessels for pedal bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:766-72.