High-resolution MR imaging of human atherosclerotic femoral arteries in vivo: Validation with intravascular ultrasound

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 14, Issue 2 I, 2003, Pages 227-231

  Meissner, Oliver A ^a   Rieger, Johannes ^a   Rieber, Johannes ^b   Klauss, Volker ^b   Siebert, Uwe ^d   Tató, Federico ^c   Pfeifer, Klaus Juergen ^a   Reiser, Maximilian ^a   Hoffmann, Ulrich ^c  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Cardiology Division   (Germany)

^c Division of Angiology   (Germany)

^d HARVARD CENTER FOR RISK ANALYSIS   (United States)

Author keywords

MR, vascular studies; US, intravascular

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTERY CALCIFICATION; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGING SYSTEM; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 0037291456     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000058325.82956.63     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Weissman NJ, Sheris SJ, Chari R, et al. Intravascular ultrasonic analysis of plaque characteristics associated with coronary artery remodeling. Am J Cardiol 1999; 84:37-40.
2. Skinner MP, Yuan C, Mitsumori L, et al. Serial magnetic resonance imaging of experimental atherosclerosis detects lesion fine structure, progression and complications in vivo. Nat Med 1995; 1:69-73.
3. Yuan C, Beach KW, Smith LH Jr, et al. Measurement of atherosclerotic carotid plaque size in vivo using high resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 1998; 98:2666-2671.
4. Hatsukami TS, Ross R, Polissar NL, et al. Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with highresolution magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation 2000; 102:959-964.
5. Coombs BD, Rapp JH, Ursell PC, et al. Structure of plaque at carotid bifurcation: high-resolution MRI with histological correlation. Stroke 2001; 32:2516-2521.
6. Manninen HI, Vanninen RL, Laitinen M, et al. Intravascular ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of atherosclerotic lesions in rabbit aorta: correlation to histopathologic findings. Invest Radiol 1998; 33:464-471.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
8. Toussaint JF, LaMuraglia GM, Southern JF, et al. Magnetic resonance images lipid, fibrous, calcified, hemorrhagic, and thrombotic components of human atherosclerosis in vivo. Circulation 1996; 94:932-938.
9. Pan XM, Saloner D, Reilly LM, et al. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21:82-88.
10. Fayad ZA, Nahar T, Fallon JT, et al. In vivo magnetic resonance evaluation of atherosclerotic plaques in the human thoracic aorta: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Circulation 2000; 101:2503-2509.
11. Borst C, Savalle LH, Smits PC, et al. Imaging of post-mortem coronary arteries by 30 MHz intravascular ultrasound. Int J Card Imaging 1991; 6:239-246.