Alignment of human resource practices and teacher performance competency

Peabody Journal of Education

Volumn 79, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 108-125

  Heneman, Herbert G ^a   Milanowski, Anthony T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248997044     PISSN: 0161956X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327930pje7904_6     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Batt, R. (2002). Managing customer services: Human resource practices, quit rates, and sales growth. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 587–598.
2. Becker, B., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 16, 53–101.
3. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
4. Darling-Hammond, L., & Youngs, P. (2002). Defining “highly qualified teachers”: What does “scientifically-based research” actually tell us? Educational Researcher, 31(9), 13–25.
5. Gallagher, H. A. (2004/this issue) Vaughn Elementary’s innovative teacher evaluation system: Are teacher evaluation scores related to growth in student achievement? Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 79–107.
6. Gratton, L., & Truss, C. (2003). The three-dimensional people strategy: Putting human resources policies into action. Academy of Management Executive, 17(3), 74–96.
7. Heneman, H. G., III, & Judge, T. A. (2003). Staffing organizations 4/e. Middleton, WI: McGraw-Hill/Mendota House.
8. Heneman, H. G., III, Huett, D. L., Lavigna, R., & Ogsten, D. (1995). Assessing managers’ satisfaction with staffing services. Personnel Psychology, 48, 163–172.
9. Kimball, S. M., White, B., Milanowski, A. T., & Borman, G. (2004/this issue). Examining the relationship between teacher evaluation and student assessment results in Washoe County. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 54–78.
10. Mendro, R. L. (1998). Student achievement and school and teacher accountability. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 12, 257–267.
11. Milanowski, A. T. (2004/this issue). The relation between teacher performance evaluation scores and student achievement: Evidence from Cincinnati. Peabody Journal of Education, 79(4), 33–53.
12. National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. (2003). No dream denied: A pledge to America’s children. Washington, DC: Author.
13. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425. (2002).
14. Rowan, B., Correnti, R., & Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: Insights from the Prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104, 1525–1567.
15. Schippman, J. S. (1999). Strategic job modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27, 701–721.
17. Wright, S. P., Horn, S. P., & Sanders, W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11, 57–67.