An analytic comparison of three models of reading strategy instruction

IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 319-338

  Allen, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248716163     PISSN: 0019042X     EISSN: 16134141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2003.015     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, John R. (1983). The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
2. Anderson, John R. (1990). Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. (3rd ed.) New York: Freeman. Anderson, Valerie (1992). A teacher development project in Transactional Strategy Instruction for teachers of severely reading-disabled adolescents. Teaching and Teacher Education 8: 391-403.
3. Anderson, Valerie and Marsha Roit (1993). Planning and implementing collaborative strategy instruction for delayed readers in grades 6–10. Elementary School Journal 94: 121–137.
4. Borkowski, John G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literacy, writing and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities 25: 253–257.
5. Brown, Rachael, Michael Pressley, Peggy Van Meter, and Ted Schuder (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of Transactional Strategies Instruction with low achieving second grades. Journal of Educational Psychology 88: 18–37.
6. Casteel, Carolyn P., Bess A. Isom, and Kathleen Jordan (2000). Creating confident and competent readers. Interventions in School and Clinic 36: 67–75.
7. Chamot, Anna Uhl (1993). Student responses to learning strategy instruction in the foreign language classroom. Fo reign Language Annals 26: 308–321.
8. Chamot, Anna Uhl (1995). Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: CALLA in Arlington, Virginia. The Bilingual Research Journal 19 (3–4): 379–394.
9. Chamot, Anna Uhl and Lisa Küpper (1989). Learning strategies in foreign language instruction. Foreign Language Annals 22: 13–24.
10. Chamot, Anna Uhl and J. Michael O'Malley (1994). The CALLA Handbook: Implementing the Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
11. Chamot, Anna Uhl and J. Michael O'Malley (1996). The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach: A model for linguistically diverse classrooms. The Elementary School Journal 96: 259–273.
12. Chamot, Anna Uhl, Sara Barnhardt, Pamela El-Dinary, Gilda Carbonaro, and Jill Robbins (1993). Methods for Teaching Learning Strategies in the Foreign Language Classroom and Assessment of Language Skills for Instruction: Final Report. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics. (ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics, No. ED 365157).
13. Chamot, Anna Uhl, Marsha Dale, J. Michael O'Malley, and George Spanos (1993). Learning and problem solving strategies of ESL students. The Bilingual Research Journal 16 (3–4): 1–38.
14. Chamot, Anna Uhl, Sara Barnhardt, Pamela El-Dinary, and Jill Robbins (1999). The Learning Strategies Handbook. White Plains, NY: Addison Wesley Longman.
15. Cohen, Andrew D. (1998). Strategies for Learning and Using a Second Language. Harlow, Essex: Longman. Collins, Cathy (1991). Reading instruction that increases thinking abilities. Journal of Reading 34: 510–516.
16. Cummins, Jim (1980). The construct of proficiency in bilingual education. In Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1980, J. E. Alatis (ed.), 81–103. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
17. Dole, Janice, Gerald G. Duffy, Laura R. Roehler, and P. David Pearson (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research 61 (2): 239–264.
18. DuCharme, Catherine, Janet Earl, and Mary S. Poplin (1989). The author model: The constructivist view of the writing process. Learning Disabilities Quarterly 12: 237–242.
19. Fillenworth, Lucille I. (1995). Using reciprocal teaching to help at-risk college freshmen study and read. Ph.D. diss., University of Minnesota.
20. Graves, Michael F., Connie Juel, and Bonnie Graves (1998). Teaching Reading in the 21st Century. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
21. Hadwin, Allyson Fiona and Phillip Winne (1996). Study strategies have meager support: A review with recommendations for implementations. Journal of Higher Education 67 (6): 692–713.
22. Harvey, Stephanie and Anne Goudivs (2000). Strategies That Work: Teaching Comprehension to Enhance Understanding. Yo rk, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
23. Henk, William and Steven Melnick (1995). The reader self-perception scale (RSPS): A new tool for how children feel about themselves as readers. The Reading Teacher 48 (6): 470–482.
24. Jensen, Eric (1998). Teaching With the Brain in Mind. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
25. Lederer, Jeffery (2000). Reciprocal teaching of social studies in inclusive elementary classrooms. Journal of Learning Disabilities 33 (1): 91–107.
26. O'Malley, J. Michael and Anna Uhl Chamot (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
27. Oxford, Rebecca L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
28. Oxford, Rebecca L. (1997). Constructivism: Shape-shifting, substance, and teacher education applications. Peabody Journal of Education 72 (1): 35–66.
29. Palinscar, Annemarie and Ann Brown (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction (1–2): 117–175.
30. Palinscar, Annemarie and Ann Brown (1986). Interactive teaching to promote independent learning from text. The Reading Teacher 39 (8): 771–777.
31. Palinscar, Annemarie and Yvonne Marie David (1991). Promoting literacy through classroom dialogue. In Literacy for a Diverse Society: Perspectives, Programs and Policies, E. Hiebert (ed.), 122–140. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
32. Pearson, P. David, Laura Roehler, Janice Dole, and Gerald Duffy (1992). Developing expertise in reading comprehension. In What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction (2nd ed.), S. S. Samuels and A. E. Farstrip (eds.), 145–199. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
33. Poplin, Mary (1988). Holistic constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21: 401–416.
34. Poplin, Mary (1988). The reductionist fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities 21: 389–400.
35. Pressley, Michael and Ruth Wharton-McDonald (1997). Skilled comprehension and its development through instruction. School Psychology Review 26 (3): 448–466.
36. Pressley, Michael, Pamela Beard El-Dinary, Irene Gaskins, Ted Schuder, Janet Bergman, Janice Almasi, and Rachael Brown (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. The Elementary School Journal 92 (5): 513–555.
37. Rosenshine, Barak, and Carla Meister (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research 64: 497–530.
38. Schunk, Dale H. (1996). Learning Theories (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Thomas, Wayne P. (1992). County of Arlington (VA) ESEA Title VII program: The Cognitive Academic Language Learning Approach (CALLA) project for mathematics, 1991–1992. Evaluation report submitted to the Office of Bilingual Education, U.S. Department of Education.
39. von Glasersfeld, Ernst (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In The Invented Reality, P. Wa tzlawick (ed.), 17–40. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
40. Vygotsky, Lev Semonovich (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.