Exploring untrained interpreters' use of direct versus indirect speech

Interpreting

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 211-236

  Dubslaff, Friedel ^a   Martinsen, Bodil ^a  

^a AARHUS SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Direct speech; Indirect speech; Medical interview; Pronoun shifts; Semi professional terminology; Untrained interpreters

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248711710     PISSN: 13846647     EISSN: 1569982X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/intp.7.2.05dub     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Adams, C., Corsellis, A. & Harmer, A. (1995). Basic handbook for trainers of public service interpreters. London: Institute of Linguists
2. Anderson, R. B. W. (1976/2002). Perspectives on the role of interpreter. In F. Pöchhacker & M. Shlesinger (Eds.), The interpreting studies reader. London/New York: Routledge, 209-217
3. Baaring, I. (2001). Tolkning - hvor og hvordan? Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur
4. Bot, H. (2003). The myth of the uninvolved interpreter interpreting in mental health and the development of a three-person psychology. In L. Brunette, G. Bastin, I. Hemlin & H. Clarke (Eds.), The critical link 3. Interpreters in the community. Selected papers from the Third International Conference on Interpreting in Legal, Health and Social Service Settings, Montreal 22-26 May 2001. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 27-35
5. Bührig, K. & Meyer, B. (2004). Ad hoc-interpreting and the achievement of communicative purposes in specific kinds of doctor-patient discourse. In Working Papers in Multilingualism 57, Universität Hamburg
6. Cambridge, J. (1999). Information loss in bilingual medical interviews through an untrained interpreter. The Translator 5 (2), 201-219
7. Dansk Flygtningehjælp (2001). Flygtningehjælpens Tolkeservice Vest. Information og vejledning for tilkaldetolke
8. Domstolsstyrelsen (2003). Rapport om tolkebistand i retssager. Appendix 4, Guidelines for court interpreting. Copenhagen
9. Driesen, C. (2002). Gerichtsdolmetschen - Praxis und Problematik. In J. Best & S. Kalina (Eds.), Übersetzen und Dolmetschen: Eine Orientierungshilfe. Tübingen/Basel: Francke, 299-306
10. Galal, L. P. & Galal, E. (1999). Goddag mand, okseskaft. Copenhagen: Mellemfolkeligt Samvirke
11. Gentile, A., Ozolins, U. & Vasilakakos, M. (1996). Liaison interpreting: A handbook. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press
12. Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Blackwell
13. Hale, S. B. (2004). The discourse of court interpreting: Discourse practices of the law, the witness and the interpreter. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
14. Harris, B. (1990). Norms in interpretation. Target 2 (1), 115-119
15. Knapp, K. & Knapp-Potthoff, A. (1985). Sprachmittlertätigkeit in interkultureller Kommunikation. In J. Rehbein (Ed.), Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr, 450-463
16. Lings, K. K. (1988). Dynamisk tolkning. Herning: Special-pædagogisk forlag
17. Löning, P. & Rehbein, J. (1995). Sprachliche Verständigungsprozesse in der Arzt-Patienten-Kommunikation. Linguistische Untersuchungen von Gesprächen in der Facharzt-Praxis. Arbeiten zur Mehrsprachigkeit 54. Universität Hamburg, Germanisches Seminar
18. Mason, I. (1999). Introduction. The Translator 5 (2), Special issue, 147-160
19. Meyer, B. (2001). How untrained interpreters handle medical terms. In I. Mason (Ed.), Triadic exchanges: Studies in dialogue interpreting. Manchester/Northampton, MA: St. Jerome, 87-106
20. Meyer, B. (2002). Untersuchungen zu den Aufgaben des interkulturellen Mitteins. In J. Best & S. Kalina (Eds.), Übersetzen und Dolmetschen: Eine Orientierungshilfe. Tübingen/Basel: Francke, 51-59
21. Metzger, M. (1999). Sign language interpreting: Deconstructing the myth of neutrality. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press
22. Niska, H. (1999). Status quaestionis: Community interpreting in Sweden. In M. Erasmus (Ed.), Liaison interpreting in the community. Pretoria: van Schaik, 138-142
23. Phelan, M. (2001). The interpreter's resource. Clevedon/Buffalo/Toronto/ Sydney: Multilingual Matters
24. Pöchhacker, F. (2004). Introducing interpreting studies. London/New York: Routledge
25. Razban, M. (2003). An interpreter's perspective. In R. Tribe & H. Raval (Eds.), Working with interpreters in mental health. Hove/New York: Brunner-Routledge, 92-98
26. Rehbein, J. (1985). Medizinische Beratung türkischer Eltern. In J. Rehbein (Ed.), Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Tübingen: Narr, 349-419
27. Shackman, J. (1984). The right to be understood. Cambridge: National Extension College
28. Shlesinger, M. (1991). Interpreter latitude vs. due process: Simultaneous and consecutive interpretation in multilingual trials. In S. Tirkkonen-Condit (Ed.), Empirical research in translation and intercultural studies. Selected papers from the TRANSIF seminar, Savonlinna 1988. Tübingen: Narr, 147-155
29. Shuy, R. W. (1976). The medical interview. Problems in communication. Primary Care 3, 365-386
30. Tebble, H. (1999). The tenor of consultant physicians. The Translator 5 (2), 179-200
31. Wadensjö, C. (1992). Interpreting as interaction. On dialogue interpreting in immigration hearings and medical encounters. Linköping University
32. Wadensjö, C. (1993). Dialogue interpreting and shared knowledge. In Y. Gambier & J. Tommola (Eds.), Translation and knowledge. Proceedings of the Fourth Scandinavian Symposium on Translation Theory, Turku 4-6 June 1992. Turku: University of Turku, Centre for Translation and Interpreting, 101-113
33. Wadensjö, C. (1997). Recycled information as a questioning strategy: Pitfalls in interpreter-mediated talk. In S. E. Carr, R. Roberts, A. Dufour & D. Stein (Eds.), The critical link: Interpreters in the community. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 35-52
34. Wadensjö, C. (1998a). Community interpreting. In M. Baker (Ed.), Routledge encyclopaedia of translation studies. London/New York: Routledge, 33-37
35. Wadensjö, C. (1998b). Interpreting as interaction. London/New York: Longman
36. Wadensjö, C. (1999). Telephone interpreting and the synchronization of talk. The Translator 5 (2), 247-264