Strategies for creating social presence online

Nurse Educator

Volumn 32, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 100-101

  Lahaie, Ulysses ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA   (Canada)

^b Box 128 ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NORTH AMERICA; NURSING EDUCATION; TEACHING;

COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, NURSING; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; NORTH AMERICA; TEACHING;

EID: 34248579335     PISSN: 03633624     EISSN: 15389855     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NNE.0000270226.84284.f8     Document Type: Short Survey

References (20)

1. Allen IE, Seaman J. Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005. Sloan Consortium Web site. Needham: The Sloan Consortium; 2005. Available at: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/freedownloads.asp. Accessed February 12, 2006.
2. Kaiser LM. Presence in three interconnected contexts: considerations for nursing education in the 21st century. Nurs Leadersh Forum. 2004;8:150-155.
3. Richardson JC, Swan K. Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. JALN. 2003;7:68-88. Available at: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/index.asp. Accessed March 8, 2006
4. Ryan M, Hodson Carlton K, Ali NS. Evaluation of traditional classroom teaching methods versus course delivery via the World Wide Web. J Nurs Educ. 1999;38:272-277.
5. Ali N, Hodson-Carlton K, Ryan M. Student perceptions of online learning: implications for teaching. Nurse Educ. 2004;29:111-115.
6. Cravener P. Faculty experiences with providing online courses: thorns among the roses. Comput Nurs. 1999;17:42-47.
7. McAlpine H, Lockerbie L, Ramsay D, Beaman S. Evaluating a Web-based graduate level nursing ethics course: thumbs up or thumbs down? J Contin Educ Nurs. 2002;33:12-18.
8. Kozlowski D. Factors for consideration in the development and implementation of an online RN-BSN course: faculty and student perceptions. Comput Inform Nurs. 2004;22:34-43.
9. Cartwright JC, Menkens R. Student perspectives on transitioning to new technologies for distance learning. Comput Inform Nurs. 2002;20:143-149.
10. Morris N, Buck-Rolland C, Gagne M. From bricks to bytes: faculty and student perspectives of online graduate nursing courses. Comput Inform Nurs. 2002;20:108-114.
11. Soon KH, Sook KI, Jung CW, Im KM. The effects of Internet-based distance learning in nursing. Comput Nurs. 2000;18:19-25.
12. Rourke L, Anderson T, Garrison DR, Archer W. Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. J Dist Educ. 1999;14:50-71.
13. Lee H, Hollaway N, Field L. Teaching online pathophysiology: the University of Colorado Health Science Center School of Nursing. In: Novotny J, Davis RH, eds. Distance Education in Nursing. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2006:139-150.
14. Liu Y, Ginther D. Managing impression formation in computer mediated communication. Educause Q. 2001;24:50-54.
15. Savery JR. Be VOCAL: characteristics of successful online learners. J Interact Learn Online. 2005;4:141-152.
16. Rovai AP. A preliminary look at the structural differences of higher education classroom communities in traditional and ALN courses. JALN. 2002;6:41-56. Available at: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/index.asp. Accessed February 23, 2006.
17. Biesenbach-Lucas S. Asynchronous discussion groups in teacher training classes: perceptions of native and non-native students. JALN. 2003;7:24-46. Available at: http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/jaln/index.asp. Accessed March 6, 2006.
18. Rovai AP. Building and sustaining community in asynchronous learning networks. Internet High Educ. 2000;3:285-297.
19. Ortiz-Rodrigues M, Telg RW, Irani T, Grady Roberts T, Rhoades E. College students' perceptions of quality in distance education: the importance of communication. Q Rev Distance Educ. 2005;6:97-105.
20. Diekelmann N, Mendias EP. Being a supportive presence in online courses: knowing and connecting with students through writing. J Nurs Educ. 2005;44:344-346.