Learners' representation of their affective domain through figurative language in a Web-based learning environment

Distance Education

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 25-43

  Manca, Stefania ^a   Delfino, Manuela ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENOA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248577636     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587910701305293     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Allan, J., & Lawless, N. (2003). Stress caused by on-line collaboration in e-learning: A developing model. Education + Training, 45(8/9), 564-572.
2. Alzola, R. A. (2003). /WHOIS? Identity: Collectivity and the self in IRC. PsychNology Journal, 7(2), 87-130.
3. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.
4. Baker, J. D. (2004). An investigation of relationships among instructor immediacy and affective and cognitive learning in the online classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(1), 1-13.
5. Blasko, D. G. (1999). Only the tip of the iceberg: Who understands what about metaphor? Journal of Pragmatics, 31(12), 1675-1683.
6. Capozzoli, M. H., McSweeney, L., & Sinha, D. (1999). Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 27(1), 3-23.
7. Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271-313.
8. Conrad, D. L. (2002). Engagement, excitement, anxiety and fear: Learners' experiences of starting an online course. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 205-226.
9. Conrad, D. L. (2005). Building and maintaining community in cohort-based online learning. Journal of Distance Education, 20(1), 1-20.
10. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.
12. Danchak, M. M., Walther, J. B., & Swan, K. P. (2001). Presence in mediated instruction: Bandwidth, behavior, and expectancy violations. Paper presented at the 7th Sloan-International Conference on Asynchronous Learning Networks (ALN), Orlando, FL.
13. Dautenhahn, K., Bond, A. H., Cañamero, L. D., & Edmonds, B. (Eds.). (2002). Socially intelligent agents: Creating relationships with computers and robots. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
14. De Simone, C., Lou, Y., & Schmid, R. F. (2001). Meaningful and interactive distance learning supported by the use of metaphor and synthesizing activities. Journal of Distance Education, 16(1), 85-101.
15. Delfino, M., & Manca, S. (in press). The expression of social presence through the use of figurative language in a web-based learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior.
16. Delfino, M., & Persico, D. (in press). Online or face-to-face? Experimenting different techniques in initial teacher training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.
17. Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Amsterdam: Pergamon.
18. Dixon, J., & Durrheim, K. (2000). Displacing place-identity: A discursive approach to locating self and others. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 27-44.
19. Fahy, P. J. (2003, April). Indicators of support in online interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(1), 1-16.
20. Feenberg, A. (1989). The written world: On the theory and practice of computer conferencing. In R. D. Mason & A. R. Kaye (Eds.), Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education. Oxford: Pergamon.
21. Forgas, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Feeling and thinking. The role of affect in social cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Frijda, N. H., Manstead, A. S. R., & Bern, S. (Eds.). (2000). Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Fussell, S. R., & Moss, M. M. (1998). Figurative language in emotional communication. In S. R. Fussell & R. J. Kreuz (Eds.), Social and cognitive approaches to interpersonal communication. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
25. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-leaming in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
26. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2/3), 87-105.
27. Gibbs, R. W., Leggitt, J. S., & Turner, E. A. (2002). What's special about figurative language in emotional communication? In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Gibbs, R. W., & Steen, G. J. (Eds.). (1999). Metaphor in cognitive linguistics: Selected papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Giese, M. (1998). Self without body: Textual self-representation in an electronic community. First Monday. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue3_4/giese/
30. Glucksberg, S., & Keysar, B. (1990). Understanding metaphorical comparisons: Beyond similarity. Psychological Review, 97(1), 3-18.
31. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam.
32. Grice, P. (1967). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
33. Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 8-25.
34. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Student distress in a web-based distance education course. Information, Communication & Society, 3(4), 557-579.
35. Henri, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing: The Najaden Papers. London: Springer Verlag.
36. Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis. An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Jcobson, D. (1999). Impression formation in Cyberspace: Online expectations and offline experiences in text-based virtual communities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 5(1). Retrieved January 25, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol5/issue1/jacobson.html
38. Jeong, A. C. (2006). The effects of conversational language on group interaction and group performance in computer-supported collaborative argumentation. Instructional Science, 34(5), 367-397.
39. Job-Sluder, K., & Barab, S. A. (2004). Shared "we" and shared "they" indicators of group identity in online teacher professional development. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408.
41. Katz, A. N., Cacciari, C., Gibbs, R. W., & Turner, M. (1998). Figurative language and thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Kövecses, Z. (2002). Emotion concepts: Social constructionism and cognitive linguistics. In S. R. Fussell (Ed.), The verbal communication of emotions: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
43. Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P. A., & Jochems, W. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Journal of Education Technology & Society, 5(1), 8-22.
44. Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411-433.
45. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2003). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
46. Lapadat, J. (2002). Written interaction: A key component in online learning. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(4). Retrieved January 25, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol7/issue4/lapadat.html
47. Lausberg, H. (1998). Handbook of literary rhetoric: A foundation for literary study. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill.
48. LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.
49. MacFadden, R. J., Herie, M. A., Maiter, S., & Dumbrill, G. C. (2005). Achieving high touch in high tech: A constructivist, emotionally-oriented model of web-based instruction. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 25(1/2), 21-44.
50. Michinov, E., & Michinov, N. (2007). Identifying a transition period at the midpoint of an online collaborative activity: A study among adult learners. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1355-1371.
51. Murphy, K. L., & Collins, M. P. (1997). Development of communication conventions in instructional electronic chats. Journal of Distance Education, 12(1/2), 177-200.
52. Novak, M. (1991). Liquid architectures in Cyberspace. In M. Benedikt (Ed.), Cyberspace: First steps. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. O'Regan, K. (2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 78-92.
54. Ortony, A., & Fainsilber, L. (1989). The role of metaphors in descriptions of emotions. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Theoretical issues in natural language processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
55. Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4). Retrieved January 25, 2007, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol1/issue4/parks.html
56. Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l'argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
57. Picard, R. W. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
58. Rice, R. E. (1993). Media appropriateness: Using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organizational media. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 451-484.
59. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
60. Ricoeur, P. (1975). La métaphore vive. Paris: Seuil.
61. Roberts, R. M., & Kreuz, R. J. (1994). Why do people use figurative language? Psychological Science, 5(3), 159-163.
62. Roschelle, J. (1996). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
63. Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 51-70.
64. Rovai, A. P., & Wighting, M. J. (2005). Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(2), 97-110.
65. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 265-283.
66. Searle, J. R. (1979). Metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Shin, N. (2003). Transactional presence as a critical predictor of success in distance learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 69-86.
68. Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
69. Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32(11), 1492-1512.
70. Stacey, E. (2002). Social presence online: Networking learners at a distance. Education and Information Technologies, 7(4), 287-294.
71. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3).
72. Tannen, D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue and imagery in conversational discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
73. Tannen, D. (1992). How is conversation like literary discourse?: The role of imagery and details in creating involvement. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
74. Trappl, R., Petta, P., & Payr, S. (Eds.). (2003). Emotions in humans and artifacts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
75. Tu, C.-H. (2002). The relationship between social presence and online privacy. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(4), 293-318.
76. Van Baren, J., & IJsselsteijn, W. (2004). Compendium of presence measures. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from http://www.presence-research.org/ Overview.html
77. Vygotskij, L. S. (1978). Mind and society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
78. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23(1), 3-41.
79. Weinrich, H. (1976). Sprache in Texten. Stuttgart: Klett.
80. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.