Teachers' perceptions of the impact of CPD: An institutional case study ed

Journal of In-Service Education

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 389-404

  Powell, Ed ^a   Terrell, Ian ^a   Furey, Scilla ^a   Scott Evans, Andy ^a  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248391543     PISSN: 13674587     EISSN: 17475082     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13674580300200282     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Radley, G., Review of Scott, D. Reading Educational Research and Policy. London. Routledge/Falmer. Available at:www.escalate.ac.uk/Reviews
2. Bolam, R., 2000. Emerging Policy Trends:some implications for continuing professional development. Journal of In-service Education, 26:267–280.
3. Brown, S., Edmonds, S., and Lee, B., 2001. Continuing Professional Development:LEA and school support for teachers, Slough:NFER. LGA Education Research Programme, Report 23
4. Burchell, H., Dyson, J., and Rees, M., 2002. Making a Difference:a study of the impactof Continuing Professional Development on professional practice. Journal of In-service Education, 28:219–229.
5. Davies, R., and Preston, M., 2002. An Evaluation of the Impact of Continuing Professional Development on Personal and Professional Lives. Journal of Inservice Education, 28:231–254.
6. Flecknoe, M., 2000. Can Continuing Professional Development for Teachers Be Shown to Raise Pupils' Achievement?. Journal of In-service Education, 26:437–457.
7. Flecknoe, M., and Saeidi, S., Teacher as Inquiring Professional:does this help the children to raise their game?. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association. April. Canada:Montreal.
8. Harland, J., Kinder, K., and Wootten, M., 1991. The Impact of School Focused INSET on Classroom Practice, Slough:National Foundation for Educational Research.
9. Joyce, B., and Showers, B., 1988. Student Achievement through Staff Development, New York:Longman.
10. Keating, I., 2001. The Efficacy of CPD:its impact upon classroom practice. Professional Development Today, 4:73–78.
11. Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED). 2001. In-service Postgraduate Training Courses for Teachers:an overview report of courses funded by the Teacher Training Agency, London:OFSTED. (Ref. No. HMI 272)
12. Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED). 2002. Continuing Professional Development for Teachers in Schools, London:OFSTED. (Ref. No. HMI 272)
13. Rhodes, C., and Houghton-Hill, S., 2000. The Linkage of Continuing Professional Development and the Classroom Experience of Pupils:barriers perceived by senior managers in some secondary schools. Journal of In-service Education, 26:419–435.
14. Steadman, S., Eraut, M., Fielding, M., and Horton, A., INSET Effectiveness. a report to the Department of Education, Institute of Continuing Professional Education. University of Sussex.
15. Underwood, B., The Teacher and Professional Development:an incoherent present and an ideal future. Inaugural Lecture, School of Education. Chelmsford:Anglia Polytechnic University.
16. Teacher Training Agency. 1995. Survey of Continuing Professional Development, London:MORI.