A contingency approach to incorporate human, emotional and social influence into a TAM for KM programs

Journal of Information Science

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 275-297

  Wu, Wann Yih ^a   Li, Chia Ying ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHENG KUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Attitude; Behavior intention; Emotion; Social influence; TAM

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING; EXPERT SYSTEMS; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

BEHAVIOR INTENTIONS; SOCIAL INFLUENCE; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM);

GESTURE RECOGNITION;

EID: 34248153252     PISSN: 01655515     EISSN: 17416485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0165551506070730     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. P. Drucker, Post-Capitalist Society ( HarperCollins, New York, 1993 ).
2. J. Ensor, A. Cottam and C. Band, Fostering knowledge management through the creative work environment: a portable model from the advertising industry, Journal of Information Science 27 (2001) 147 55.
3. S.L. Jarvenpaa and D.S. Staples, The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (2000) 129 54.
4. J. Rowley, Knowledge management in pursuit of learning: the Learning with Knowledge Cycle, Journal of Information Science 27 (2001) 227 37.
5. M.T. Hansen, N. Nohria and T. Tierney, What's your strategy for managing knowledge? Harvard Business Review (MarchApril 1999) 106 16.
6. C.W. Holsapple and K.D. Joshi, A formal knowledge management ontology: conduct, activities, resources, and influences, Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology 55 (2004) 593 613.
7. E. Davenport, Mundane knowledge management and micro-level organizational learning: an ethological approach, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (2002) 1038 1147.
8. R. Jones, Measuring the benefits of knowledge management at the financial services authority: a case study, Journal of Information Science 29 (2003) 475 87.
9. M.H. Zack, Developing a knowledge strategy, California Management Review 41 (1999) 125 45.
10. M.H. Zack, Managing codified knowledge, Sloan Management Review (Summer 1999) 45 58.
11. J. Swan, S. Newell and M. Robertson, Limits of IT-driven knowledge management for interactive innovation processes: toward a community-based approach. In: R.H. Sprague Jr (ed.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 47, Kona, Hawaii (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 2000) 1013 24.
12. R. Bohn, Measuring and managing technological knowledge, Sloan Management Review 36 (1994) 61 73.
13. H. Singh and M. Zollo, The impact of knowledge codification, experience trajectories and integration strategies on the performance of corporation acquisitions (Wharton Financa Institutions Center / INSEAD, 1998). [Working Paper 9824.]
14. J. Jordan and P. Jones, Assessing your company's knowledge management style, Long Range Planning 30 (1997) 392 8.
15. V. Venkatesh and F.D. Davis, A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test, Decision Sciences 27 (1996) 451 81.
16. K. Mathieson, Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior, Information Systems Research 2 (1991) 173 91.
17. D.A. Adams, R.R. Nelson and P.A. Todd, Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: a replication, MIS Quarterly 16 (1992) 227 47.
18. M. Igbaria, S. Parasuraman and J.J. Baroudi, Microcomputer usage, Journal of Management Information Systems 13 (1996) 127 43.
19. W.W. Chin and A. Gopal, Adoption intention in GSS: relative importance of beliefs, The Database for Advances in Information Systems 26 (2 / 3) (1995) 42 64.
20. M. Keil, P.M. Beranek and B.R. Konsynski, Usefulness and ease of use: field study evidence regarding task considerations, Decision Support Systems 13 (1995) 75 91.
21. Y. Malhotra and G.D.F. Galletta, Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to account for social influence: theoretical bases and empirical validation. In: R.H. Sprague Jr (ed.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 58, Kona, Hawaii (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 1999) 619.
22. W.J. Doll, A. Hendrickson and D. Xiandong, Using Davis's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use instruments for decision making: a confirmatory and multi-group invariance analysis, Decision Science 29 (1998) 839 70.
23. F. Soliman and K. Spooner, Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resources management, Journal of Knowledge Management 4 (2000) 337 78.
24. G.V. Krogh and I. Nonaka, Enabling Knowledge Creation ( Oxford University Press, New York, 2000 ).
25. V. Venkatesh and F.D. Davis, A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies, Management Science 46 (2000) 186 204.
26. V. Venkatesh and C. Speier, Computer technology training in the workplace: a longitudinal investigation of the effect of mood, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 79 (1999) 1 28.
27. H. Akbar, Knowledge levels and their transformation: towards the integration of knowledge creation and individual learning, The Journal of Management Studies 40 (2003) 1997 2021.
28. I. Nonaka, R. Toyama and N. Konno, SECI, ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation, Long Range Planning 33 (2000) 5 34.
29. D.J. Teece, Managing Intellectual Capital ( Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000 ).
30. G. Perez-Bustamante, Knowledge management in agile innovative organizations, Journal of Knowledge Management 3 (1999) 6 17.
31. K.A. April, Guidelines for developing a k-strategy, Journal of Knowledge Management 6 (2002) 445 56.
32. B. Choi and H. Lee, Knowledge management strategy and its link to the knowledge creation process, Expert Systems with Applications 23 (2002) 173 87.
33. M.J.D. Sutton, Integrated document and content management: strategies for exploiting enterprise knowledge, Information Processing and Management 41 (2005) 1299 1301.
34. M. Schulz and L.A. Jobe, Codification and tacitness as knowledge management strategies: an empirical exploration, The Journal of High Technology Management Research 12 (2001) 139 68.
35. D.L. Goodhue, Understanding user evaluations of information systems, Management Science 41 (1995) 1827 44.
36. D.L. Goodhue and R.L. Thompson, Task-technology fit and individual performance, MIS Quarterly 19 (2) (1995) 214 36.
37. G.V. Krogh, Care in knowledge creation, California Management Review 40 (1998) 133 53.
38. D.W.D. Long and L. Fahey, Diagnosing culture barriers to knowledge management, Academy of Management Executive 14 (2000) 113 27.
39. G.W. Bock and Y.G. Kim, Breaking the myths of rewards: an exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing, Information Resource Management Journal 15 (2002) 14 22.
40. G.S. Howard and R.D. Smith, Computer anxiety in management: myth or reality? Communications of ACM 29 (1986) 611 15.
41. M. Igbaria, T. Guimaraes and G.B. Davis, Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model, Journal of Management Information Systems 11 (1995) 87 114.
42. M. Igbaria and A. Chakrabarti, Computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputer use, Behavior Information Technology 9 (1990) 29 39.
43. M. Igbaria and S. Parasuraman, A path analytic study of individual characteristics, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward microcomputers, Journal of Management 15 (1989) 373 88.
44. P.C. Morrow, E.R. Prell and J.C. McElroy, Attitudinal and behavioral correlates of computer anxiety, Psychological Report 59 (1986) 1199 1204.
45. S. Parasuraman and M. Igbaria, An examination of gender differences in the determinants of computer anxiety and attitudes toward microcomputers among managers, Journal of ManMachine Studies 32 (1990) 327 40.
46. P. Popovich, K. Hyde, T. Zakrajesek and C. Blumer, The development of the attitudes toward computer usage scale, Psychological Measurement 47 (1987) 261 9.
47. M.G. Elasmar and M.E. Carter, Use of e-mail by college students and implications for curriculum, Journal of Mass Communication 51 (1996) 46 54.
48. D.R. Compeau and C.A. Higgins, Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills, Information System Research 6 (1995) 118 43.
49. C.R. Scott and S.C. Rockwell, The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies, Communication Education 46 (1997) 44 62.
50. J. Todman and N. Monaghan, Qualitative differences in computer experience, computer anxiety, and students' use of computers: a path model, Computer Human Behavior 10 (1994) 529 39.
51. A.A. Anderson, Predictors of computer anxiety and performance in information systems, Human Behavior 12 (1996) 61 77.
52. R.K.J. Heinssen, C.R. Glass and L.A. Knight, Assessing computer anxiety: development and validation of the computer anxiety rating scale, Computers in Human Behavior 3 (1987) 49 59.
53. S.P. Robbins and M. Coulter, Management ( Prentice-Hall International, Englewood Cliffs, 2002 ).
54. L.W. Morris, M.A. Davis and C.H. Hutching, Cognitive and emotional components of anxiety: literature review and a revised worry-emotionality scale, Journal of Educational Psychology 73 (1984) 541 55.
55. B.N. Philipi, R.P. Martin and J. Meyers, Interventions in relation to anxiety in school. In: C.D. Spielberger (ed.), Current Trends in Theory and Research ( Academic Press, New York, 1972 ).
56. F.D. Davis, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly 13 (1989) 19 34.
57. F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science 35 (1989) 982 1003.
58. M. Fishbein and I. Ajzen, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research ( Addison- Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975 ).
59. V. Venkatesh, M.M,G. Davis and F.D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly 27 (2003) 425 78.
60. W. Money and A. Turner, Application of the Technology Acceptance Model to a knowledge management system. In: R.H. Sprague Jr (ed.), Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 58, Kona, Hawaii (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 2004) 80237b.
61. W.W. Chin and A. Gopal, An examination of the relative importance of four beliefs constructs on the GSS adoption decision: a comparison of four methods. In: R.H. Sprague Jr (ed.), Proceedings of the 26th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, January 38, Kona, Hawaii (IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 1993) 54857.
62. F.D. Davis, User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavior impacts, International Journal of ManMachine Studies 38 (1993) 475 87.
63. D. Gefen and D.W. Straub, Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: an extension to the technology acceptance model, MIS Quarterly 21 (1997) 389 400.
64. A.H. Segars and V. Grover, Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis, MIS Quarterly 17 (1993) 517 25.
65. G.H. Subramanian, A replication of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use measurement, Decision Science 25 (1994) 863 74.
66. B. Szajna, Software evaluation and choice: predictive validation of the technology acceptance instrument, MIS Quarterly 18 (1994) 319 24.
67. S. Taylor and P.A. Todd, Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models, Information Systems Research 6 (1995) 144 76.
68. V. Venkatesh, Creating favorable use perceptions: exploring the role of intrinsic motivation, MIS Quarterly 23 (1999) 239 60.
69. V. Venkatesh and M.G. Morris, Why don't men ever stop asking for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior, MIS Quarterly 24 (2000) 115 39.
70. B. Cronin, Knowledge management, organizational culture and Anglo-American higher education, Journal of Information Science 27 (2001) 129 37.
71. M.P.A. Thompson and G. Walsham, Placing knowledge management in context, Journal of Management Studies 41 (2004) 725 47.
72. Q. Ma and L. Liu, The technology acceptance model: a meta-analysis of empirical findings, Journal of Organizational and End User Computing 16 (1) (2004) 59-74.
73. F.D. Davis, R.P. Bagozzi and P.R. Warshaw, Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace, Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22 (1992) 1111 32.
74. V. Venkatesh, C. Speier and M.G. Morris, User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: toward an integrated model, Decision Sciences 33 (2) (2002) 297 316.
75. E. Vigoda, Internal politics in public administration systems, Public Personnel Management 29 (2000) 185 210.
76. M.K.O. Lee, C.M.K. Cheung and Z. Chen, Acceptance of Internet-based learning medium: the role of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, Information and Management 42 (2005) 1095 1104.
77. M. Igbaria, S.J. Schiffman and T.J. Wieckowski, The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology, Behavior and Information Technology 13 (1994) 349 61.
78. C.C. Bracken and M. Lombard, Social presence and children: praise, intrinsic motivation and learning with computers, Journal of Communication 54 (2004) 22 37.
79. R. Shang, Y. Chen and L. Shen, Extrinsic versus intrinsic motivations for consumers to shop on-line, Information and Management 42 (2005) 401 13.
80. E. Karahanna and D.W. Straub, The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease of use, Information and Management 35 (1999) 237 50.
81. W. Hong, J.Y.L. Thong, W.M. Wong and K.Y. Tam, Determinants of use acceptance of digital libraries: an empirical examination of individual differences and system characteristics, Journal of Information Science 18 (201 2) 97 124.
82. C.L. Hsu and H.P. Lu, Why do people play on-line games? An extended TAM with social influences and flow experience, Information and Management 41 (2004) 853 68.
83. M. Kleijnen, M. Wetzels and K.D. Ruyter, Consumer acceptance of wireless finance, Journal of Financial Service Marketing 8 (2004) 206 17.
84. J. Lu, C. Yu, C. Liu and J.E. Yao, Technology acceptance model for wireless internet, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 13 (2003) 206 22.
85. R.L. Thompson, C.A. Higgins and J.M. Howell, Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization, MIS Quarterly (March 1991) 125 43.
86. S. Sussman and W. Siegal, Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach to knowledge adoption, Information Systems Research 14 (2003) 47 65.
87. M.Y. Chen and A.P. Chen, Integrating option model and knowledge management performance measures: an empirical study, Journal of Information Science 31 (2005) 381 93.
88. C.O. Egbu, Managing knowledge and intellectual capital for improved organizational innovations in the construction industry: an examination of critical success factors, Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 11 (2004) 301 15.
89. A.H. Gold, A. Malhotra and A.H. Segars, Knowledge management: an organizational capabilities perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (2001) 185 214.
90. Y. Yoo and B. Torrey, National culture and knowledge management in a global learning organization. In: C.W. Choo and N. Bontis (eds), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge ( Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002 ).
91. I.B. Fernandez and R. Sabherwal, Organizational knowledge management: a contingency perspective, Journal of Management Information Systems 18 (2001) 23 55.
92. I. Nonaka, R. Toyama and A. Nagata, A firm as a knowledge creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm, Industrial and Corporate Change 9 (2000) 1 20.
93. G.W. Bock, R.W. Zmud and Y.G. Kim, Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: examine the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate, MIS Quarterly 29 (2005) 87 111.
94. M. Foucault, The Care of the Self ( Vintage, New York, 1972 ).
95. T.C. Chou, P.L. Chang, C.T. Tsai and Y.P. Cheng, Internal learning climate, knowledge management process and perceived knowledge management satisfaction, Journal of Information Science 31 (2005) 96 113.
96. C. McInerney, Trust in knowledge management and systems in organizations, Information Processing and Management 41 (2005) 720 22.
97. G. Hackbarth, V. Grover and M.Y. Yi, Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediator of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use, Information and Management 40 (2003) 221 32.
98. V. Venkatesh, Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model, Information Systems Research 11 (2000) 342 65.
99. D.M. Levy and C.C. Marshall, Going digital: a look at the assumptions underlying digital libraries, Communications of the ACM 38 (1995) 77 84.
100. G.V. Barrett, M.H. Thornton and P.A. Cabe, Human factors evaluation of computer based storage and retrieval system, Human Factors 10 (1968) 431 6.
101. D. Gefen and M. Keil, The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness: an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model, The Database for Advances in Information Systems 29 (1998) 35 49.
102. J.H. Paul, Y.K. Chau, R.L. Sheng and K.Y. Tam, Examining the Technology Acceptance Model using physician acceptance of telemedicine technology, Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (1999) 91 112.
103. E.B. Swanson, Information channel disposition and use, Decision Science 21 (1987) 131 45.
104. J. Yu, I. Ha, M. Choi and J. Rho, Extending the TAM for a t-commerce, Information and Management 42 (2005) 965 76.
105. H.C. Kelman, Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change ? Journal of Conflict Resolution 2 (1958) 51 60.
106. V. Venkatesh, M.G. Morris and P.L. Ackerman, A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process 83 (2000) 33 60.
107. P. Roberts and R. Henderson, Information technology acceptance in a sample of government employees: a test of the Technology Acceptance Model, Interacting with Computers 12 (2000) 427 43.
108. J. Hair, R. Anderson, R. Tatham and W. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis ( Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2002 ).
109. N. Schulz and H. Bless, Mood congruity and social judgments. In: J. P. Forgas (ed.), Emotion and Social Judgment (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1991) 31 54.
110. G.D. Bhatt, Knowledge management in organizations: examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people, Journal of Knowledge Management 5 (2001) 68 75.
111. H. Hall, Input-friendliness: motivating knowledge sharing across intranets, Journal of Information Science 27 (2001) 139 46.
112. Y.M. Mei, S.T. Lee and S. Al-Hawamdeh, Formulating a communication strategy for effective Knowledge sharing, Journal of Information Science 30 (2004) 12 22.
113. C. McInerney, Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge, Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 (2002) 1009 19.
114. S. Arunachalam, Information and knowledge in the age of electronic communication: a developing country perspective, Journal of Information Science 25 (6) (1999) 465 76.