Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison

Chromosome Research

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 283-297

  Romanenko, Svetlana A ^a   Volobouev, Vitaly T ^b   Perelman, Polina L ^a   Lebedev, Vladimir S ^c   Serdukova, Natalya A ^a   Trifonov, Vladimir A ^a,d   Biltueva, Larisa S ^a   Nie, Wenhui ^e   O'Brien, Patricia C M ^d   Bulatova, Nina Sh ^f   Ferguson Smith, Malcolm A ^d   Yang, Fengtang ^g   Graphodatsky, Alexander S ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^b Sorbonne Universités   (France)

^c MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^e INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

^f SEVERTSOV INSTITUTE OF ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION   (Russian Federation)

^g WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Chromosome painting; Comparative chromosome maps; Cricetidae; Genome evolution; Phylogeny; Rodentia

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME BANDING PATTERN; CHROMOSOME MAP; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CONSERVATION GENETICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRICETIDAE; FEMALE; HETEROCHROMATIN; KARYOTYPE EVOLUTION; MALE; NONHUMAN; PHODOPUS; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RODENT; SYRIAN HAMSTER;

ALLOCRICETULUS; CALOMYSCUS; CRICETIDAE; CRICETINAE; CRICETULUS; CRICETULUS GRISEUS; CRICETUS; MESOCRICETUS; MESOCRICETUS AURATUS; MUROIDEA; PEROMYSCUS; PHODOPUS; RODENTIA; TSCHERSKIA;

EID: 34248144952     PISSN: 09673849     EISSN: 15736849     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1124-3     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Adkins RM, Walton AH, Honeycutt RL (2002) Higher-level systematics of rodents and divergence time estimates based on two congruent nuclear genes. Mol Phylogenet Evol 26: 409-420.
2. Aniskin VM, Benazzou T, Biltueva L, Dobigny G, Granjon L, Volobouev V (2006) Unusually extensive karyotype reorganization in four congeneric Gerbillus species (Muridae: Gerbillinae). Cytogenet Genome Res 112: 131-140.
3. Carleton MD, Musser GG (2005) Order Rodentia. In Wilson E, Reeder D-AM, eds., Mammal Species of the World: a Taxonomic and Geographic Reference. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 926-930, 1039-1186.
4. Cavagna P, Stone G, Stanyon R (2002) Black rat (Rattus rattus) genomic variability characterized by chromosome painting. Mamm Genome 13: 157-163.
5. Dobigny G, Ducroz JF, Robinson TJ, Volobouev V (2004) Cytogenetics and cladistics. Syst Biol 53: 470-484.
6. Engelbrecht A, Dobigny G, Robinson TJ (2006) Further insights into the ancestral murine karyotype: the contribution of the Otomys-Mus comparison using chromosome painting. Cytogenet Genome Res 112: 126-130.
7. Ferguson-Smith MA, Yang F, O'Brien PC (1998) Comparative mapping using chromosome sorting and painting. ILAR J 39: 68-76.
8. Froenicke L, Caldes MG, Graphodatsky A et al. (2006) Are molecular cytogenetics and bioinformatics suggesting diverging models of ancestral mammalian genomes? Genome Res 16: 306-310.
9. Gamperl R, Vistorin G, Rosenkranz W (1978) Comparison of chromosome banding patterns in five members of Cricetinae with comments on possible relationships. Caryologia 31: 343-353.
10. Graphodatsky AS (1989) Conserved and variable elements of mammalian chromosomes. In Halnan CRE, ed., Cytogenetics of Animals. Oxford: CAB International Press, pp. 95-123.
11. Graphodatsky AS, Sablina OV, Meyer MN et al. (2000) Comparative cytogenetics of hamsters of the genus Calomyscus. Cytogenet Cell Genet 88: 296-304.
12. Graphodatsky AS, Yang F, O'Brien PCM et al. (2001) Phylogenetic implications of the 38 putative ancestral chromosome segments for four canid species. Cytogenet Cell Genet 92: 243-247.
13. Guilly M-N, Dano L, de Chamisso P, Fouchet P, Dutrillaux B, Chevillard S (2001) Comparative karyotype using bidirectional chromosome painting: how and why? Methods Cell Sci 23: 163-170.
14. Guilly M-N, Fouchet P, de Chamisso P, Schmitz A, Dutrillaux B (1999) Comparative karyotype of rat and mouse using bidirectional chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 7: 213-221.
15. Jansa SA, Weksler M (2004) Phylogeny of muroid rodents: relationships within and among major lineages as determined by IRBP gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31: 256-276.
16. Li T, O'Brien PC, Biltueva L et al. (2004) Evolution of genome organizations of squirrels (Sciuridae) revealed by cross-species chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 12: 317-335.
17. Li T, Wang J, Su W, Nie W, Yang F (2006a) Karyotypic evolution of the family Sciuridae: inferences from the genome organizations of ground squirrels. Cytogenet Genome Res 112: 270-276.
18. Li T, Wang J, Su W, Yang F (2006b) Chromosomal mechanisms underlying the karyotype evolution of the oriental voles (Muridae, Eothenomys). Cytogenet Genome Res 114: 50-55.
19. Matsubara K, Nishuda-Umehara C, Tsuchiya K, Nukaya D, Matsuda Y (2004) Karyotypic evolution of Apodemus (Muridae, Rodentia) inferred from comparative FISH analyses. Chromosome Res 12: 383-395.
20. Matsubara K, Nishida-Umehara C, Kuriowa A, Tsuchiya K, Matsuda Y (2003) Identification of chromosome rearrangements between the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) and the Indian spiny mouse (Mus platythrix) by comparative FISH analysis. Chromosome Res 11: 57-64.
21. Michaux J, Reyes A, Catzeftis F (2001) Evolutionary history of the most specious mammals: molecular phylogeny of muroid rodents. Mol Biol Evol 18: 2017-2031.
22. Murphy WJ, Eizirik E, Johnson WE, Zhang YP, Ryder OA, O'Brien SJ (2001a) Molecular phylogenetics and the origins of placental mammals. Nature 409: 614-618.
23. Murphy WJ, Larkin DM, Everts-van der Wind A et al. (2005) Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps. Science 309: 613-617.
24. Murphy WJ, Stanyon, O'Brien SJ (2001b) Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mapping. Genome Biol 2: 1-8.
25. Neumann K, Michaux J, Lebedev V et al. (2006) Molecular phylogeny of the Cricetinae subfamily based on the mitochondrial cytochrome b and 12S rRNA genes and the nuclear vWF gene. Mol Phylogenet Evol 39: 135-148.
26. Radjabli SI (1975) The karyotypic differentiation of Palaearctic hamsters (Rodentia, Cricetidae). Reports of AS of USSR 225: 697-700.
27. Radjabli SI, Sablina OV, Graphodatsky AS (2006) Selected karyotypes. In O'Brien SJ, Nash WG, Menninger JC, eds., ATLAS of Mammalian Karyotypes. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 188, 200-221.
28. Rambau RV, Robinson TJ (2003) Chromosome painting in the African four-striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio: detection of possible murid specific contiguous segment combination. Chromosome Res 11: 91-98.
29. Richard F, Messaoudi C, Bonnet-Gamier A, Lombard M, Dutrillaux B (2003) Highly conserved chromosomes in an Asian squirrel (Menetes berdmorei, Rodentia: Sciuridae) as demonstrated by ZOO-FISH with human probes. Chromosome Res 11: 597-603.
30. Romanenko SA, Perelman PL, Serdukova NA et al. (2006) Reciprocal chromosome painting between three laboratory rodent species. Mamm Genome 17: 1183-1192.
31. Schmid M, Haaf T, Weis H, Schempp W (1986) Chromosomal homoeologies in hamster species of the genus Phodopus (Rodentia, Cricetinae). Cytogenet Cell Genet 43: 168-173.
32. Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2: 971-972.
33. Stanyon R, Stone G, Garcia M, Froenicke L (2003) Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that squirrels, unlike murid rodents, have a highly conserved genome organization. Genomics 82: 245-249.
34. Stanyon R, Yang F, Cavagna P et al. (1999) Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and cats. Cytogenet Cell Genet 84: 150-155.
35. Stanyon R, Yang F, Morescalchi AM, Galleni L (2004) Chromosome painting in the long-tailed field mouse provides insights into the ancestral murid karyotype. Cytogenet Genome Res 105: 406-411.
36. Steppan SJ, Adkins RM, Anderson J (2004) Phylogeny and divergence-data estimates of rapid radiations in muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes. Syst Biol 53: 533-553.
37. Swofford DL (1998) PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parcimony, version 4.0. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
38. Veyrunes F, Dobigny G, Yang F et al. (2006) Phylogenomics of the genus Mus (Rodentia; Muridae): extensive genome repatterning is not restricted to the house mouse. Proc R Soc B 273: 2925-2934.
39. Viegas-Pequignot E, Petit D, Benazzou T et al. (1986) Chromosomal evolution in rodents. Mammalia 50: 164-202.
40. Volobouev VT, Gallardo MH, Graphodatsky AS (2006) Rodents cytogenetics. In O'Brien J, Nash WG, Menninger JC, eds., ATLAS of Mammalian Karyotypes. Chichester: John Wiley, pp. 173-176.
41. Vorontzov NN, Potapova EG (1979) Taxonomy of the genus Calomyscus: status of the Calomyscus in the system of Cricetidae. Zool J 58: 1391-1397 [Rusian].
42. Yang F, Fu B, O'Brien PC, Robinson TJ, Ryder OA, Ferguson-Smith MA (2003) Karyotypic relationships of horses and zebras: results of cross-species chromosome painting. Cytogenet Genome Res 102: 235-243.
43. Yang F, O'Brien PC, Milne BS (1999) A complete comparative chromosome map for the dog, red fox, and human and its integration with canine genetic maps. Genomics 62: 189-202.
44. Yang F, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA (2000) Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 8: 219-227.