Further insights into the ancestral murine karyotype: The contribution of the Otomys-Mus comparison using chromosome painting

Cytogenetic and Genome Research

Volumn 112, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 126-130

  Engelbrecht, A ^a   Dobigny, G ^a,b   Robinson, T J ^a  

^a STELLENBOSCH UNIVERSITY   (South Africa)

^b CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTOSOME; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOGENETICS; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR PROBE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

ANIMALS; CELLS, CULTURED; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FIBROBLASTS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; KARYOTYPING; MICE; MURIDAE;

MURINAE; OTOMYS; OTOMYS IRRORATUS;

EID: 27644518441     PISSN: 14248581     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000087524     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bourque G, Pevzner PA, Tesler G: Reconstructing the genomic architecture of ancestral mammals: lessons from human, mouse and rat genomes. Genome Res 14:507-516 (2004).
2. Cavagna P, Stone G, Stanyon R: Black rat (Rattus rattus) genomic variability characterized by chromosome painting. Mamm Genome 13:157-163 (2002).
3. Dobigny G, Ducroz JF, Robinson TJ, Volobouev V: Cytogenetics and cladistics. Syst Biol 53:470-484 (2004).
4. Grützner F, Himmelbauer H, Paulsen M, Ropers HH, Haaf T: Comparative mapping of mouse and rat chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genomics 55:306-313 (1999).
5. Guilly MN, Fouchet P, de Chamisso P, Schmitz A, Dutrillaux B: Comparative karyotype of mouse and rat using bidirectional chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 7:213-221 (1999).
6. Jacobs LL, Downs WR: The evolution of murine rodents in Asia, in Tomida Y, Li CK, Setogushi T (eds): Rodent and Lagomorph Families of Asian Origins and Their Diversification, pp 149-156 (National Science Museum Monograph, Tokyo 1994).
7. Jaeger JJ, Tong H, Denys C: Age de la divergence Mus-Rattus: comparaison des données paléontologiques et moléculaires. C R Acad Paris, Série II 302:917-922 (1986).
8. Jansa SA, Weksler M: Phytogeny of muroid rodents: relationships within and among major lineages as determined by IRBP gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 31:256-276 (2003).
9. Li T, O'Brien PCM, Biltueva L, Fu B, Wang J, Nie W, Ferguson-Smith MA, Graphodatsky AS, Yang F: Evolution of genome organizations of squirrels (Sciuridae) revealed by cross-species chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 12:317-335 (2004).
10. Matsubara K, Nishida-Umehara C, Kuriowa A, Tsuchiya K, Matsuda Y: Identification of chromosome rearrangements between the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) and the Indian spiny mouse (Mus platythrix) by comparative FISH analysis. Chromosome Res 11:57-64 (2003).
11. Matsubara K, Nishida-Umehara C, Tsuchiya K, Nukaya D, Matsuda Y: Karyotypic evolution of Apodemus (Muridae, Rodentia) inferred from comparative FISH analyses. Chromosome Res 12:383-395 (2004).
12. Michaux JR, Chevret P, Filippucci MG, Macholan M: Phylogeny of the genus Apodemus with a special emphasis on the genus Sylvaemus using the nuclear IRBP gene and two mitochondrial markers: cytochrome b and 12S rRNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 23:123-136 (2002).
13. Murphy WJ, Stanyon R, O'Brien SJ: Evolution of mammalian genome organization inferred from comparative gene mapping. Genome Biol 2:1-8 (2001).
14. Murphy WJ, Frönicke L, O'Brien SJ, Stanyon R: The origin of human chromosome 1 and its homologs in placental mammals. Genome Res 13:1880-1888 (2003).
15. Murphy WJ, Pevzner PA, O'Brien SJ: Mammalian phylogenomics comes of age. Trends Genet 20:631-639 (2004).
16. Rambau RV, Robinson TJ: Chromosome painting in the African four striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio: detection of possible murid specific contiguous segment associations. Chromosome Res 11:91-98 (2003).
17. Rambau RV, Elder FF, Robinson TJ: Chromosomal evolution in the vlei rat, Otomys irroratus (Muridae: Otomyinae): a compound chromosomal rearrangement separates two major cytogenetic groups. Cytogenet Cell Genet 93:253-257 (2001).
18. Richard F, Messaoudi C, Bonnet-Garnier A, Lombard M, Dutrillaux B: Highly conserved chromosomes in an Asian squirrel (Menetes berdmorei, Rodentia: Sciuridae) as demonstrated by ZOO-FISH with human probes. Chromosome Res 11:597-603 (2003).
19. Robinson TJ, Elder FF: Extensive genome organization in the African rodent, genus Otomys. J Zool Lond 211:735-746 (1987).
20. Sato JJ, Suzuki H: Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of the genus Tokudaia within Murinae (Muridae; Rodentia) inferred from the nucleotide sequences encoding the Cytb gene, RGA1, and IRBP. Can J Zool 82:1343-1351 (2004).
21. Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U, Weier HU, Limade-Faria A, Frönicke L: Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nat Genet 6:342-347 (1994).
22. Seabright M: The use of proteolytic enzymes for the mapping of structural rearrangements in the chromosome of man. Chromosoma 36:204-210 (1971).
23. Stanyon R, Yang F, Cavagna P, O'Brien PCM, Bagga M, Ferguson-Smith MA, Wienberg J: Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and cats. Cytogenet Cell Genet 84:150-155 (1999).
24. Stanyon R, Stone G, Garcia M, Froenicke L: Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that squirrels, unlike murid rodents, have a highly conserved genome organization. Genomics 82:245-249 (2003).
25. Stanyon R, Yang F, Morescalchi AM, Galleni L: Chromosome painting in the long-tailed field mouse provides insights into the ancestral murid karyotype. Cytogenet Genome Res 105:406-411 (2004).
26. Steppan SJ, Adkins RM, Anderson J: Phylogeny and divergence-date estimates of rapid radiations in Muroid rodents based on multiple nuclear genes. Syst Biol 53:533-553 (2004).
27. Sumner AT: A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304-306 (1972).
28. Usdin K, Chevret P, Catzeflis F, Verona R, Furano AV: L1 (LINE-1) retrotransposable elements provide a "fossil" record of the phylogenetic history of murid rodents. Mol Biol Evol 12:73-82 (1995).
29. nd ed (Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington and London 1993).
30. Yang F, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA: Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 8:219-227 (2000).