Identification of chromosome rearrangements between the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus) and the Indian spiny mouse (Mus platythrix) by comparative FISH analysis

Chromosome Research

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 57-64

  Matsubara, Kazumi ^a   Nishida Umehara, Chizuko ^a   Kuroiwa, Asato ^a   Tsuchiya, Kimiyuki ^b   Matsuda, Yoichi ^a  

^a HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Chromosome homology; Chromosome painting; Comparative mapping; Mus musculus; Mus platythrix

Indexed keywords

RNA;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME IDENTIFICATION; CHROMOSOME INSERTION; CHROMOSOME MAP; CHROMOSOME PAINTING; CHROMOSOME REARRANGEMENT; CHROMOSOME TRANSLOCATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOLUTION; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE LOCATION; MOUSE; MOUSE STRAIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME BANDING; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES; CYTOGENETICS; IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION, FLUORESCENCE; MICE; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 18S; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 28S; RNA, RIBOSOMAL, 5S;

ANIMALIA; INSERTION SEQUENCES; MUS; MUS MUSCULUS; MUS PLATYTHRIX; MUS SAXICOLA; MUSCULUS; RODENTIA;

EID: 0037223655     PISSN: 09673849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022010116287     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bonhomme F, Guénet J-L (1996) The laboratory mouse and its wild relatives. In: Lyon MF, Rastan S, Brown SDM, eds. Genetic Variants and Strains of the Laboratory Mouse. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp 1577-1596.
2. Dev VG, Tantravahi R, Miller DA, Miller OJ (1977) Nucleolus organizers in Mus musculus subspecies and in the RAG mouse cell line. Genetics 86: 389-398.
3. Ellerman JR (1961) Mammalia Vol. 3 Rodentia. In: Roonwal ML, ed. The Fauna of India Including Pakistan, Burma and Ceylon. Calcutta, India: Baptist Mission Press, pp 771-782.
4. Hammer MF, Schimenti J, Silver LM (1989) Evolution of mouse chromosome 17 and the origin of inversions associated with t haplotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86: 3261-3265.
5. Herrmann B, Bucan M, Mains PE, Frischauf A-M, Silver LM, Lehrach H (1986) Genetic analysis of the proximal portion of the mouse t complex: evidence for a second inversion within t haplotypes. Cell 44: 469-476.
6. Kominami R, Mishima Y, Urano Y, Sakai M, Muramatsu M (1982) Cloning and determination of the transcription termination site of ribosomal RNA gene of the mouse. Nucl Acids Res 10: 1963-1979.
7. Kuroiwa A, Tsuchiya K, Watanabe T et al. (2001) Conservation of the rat X chromosome gene order in rodent species. Chromosome Res 9: 61-67.
8. Matsuda Y, Chapman VM (1995) Application of fluorescence in situ hybridization in genome analysis of the mouse. Electrophoresis 16: 261-272.
9. Matsuda Y, Harada Y-N, Natsuume-Sakai S, Lee K, Shiomi T, Chapman VM (1992) Location of the mouse complement factor H gene (cfh) by FISH analysis and replication R-banding. Cytogenet Cell Genet 61: 282-285.
10. Matsuda Y, Moriwaki K, Chapman VM, Hoi-Sen Y, Akbarzadeh J, Suzuki H (1994) Chromosomal mapping of mouse 5S rRNA genes by direct R-banding fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cytogenet Cell Genet 66: 246-249.
11. Scherthan H, Cremer T, Arnason U, Weier H-U, Lima-de-Faria A, Frönicke L (1994) Comparative chromosome painting discloses homologous segments in distantly related mammals. Nature Genet 6: 342-347.
12. Schubert S, Dechend F, Skawran B, Krawczak M, Schmidtke J (2000) Molecular evolution of the murine tspy genes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 91: 239-242.
13. Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 7731: 971-972.
14. Stanyon R, Yang F, Cavagna P et al. (1999) Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that genomic rearrangement between rat and mouse proceeds ten times faster than between humans and cats. Cytogenet Cell Genet 84: 150-155.
15. Suzuki H, Kurihara Y, Kanehisa T, Moriwaki K (1990) Variation in the distribution of silver-staining nucleolar organizer regions on the chromosomes of the wild mouse, Mus musculus. Mol Biol Evol 7: 271-282.
16. Tsuchiya K, Yosida TH (1972) Indian brown spiny mouse, Mus platythrix, having the lowest fundamental chromosome number. Ann Rep Natl Inst Genet Jpn 22: 51-52.
17. Wienberg J, Jauch A, Stanyon R, Cremer T (1990) Molecular cytotaxonomy of primates by chromosomal in situ suppression hybridization. Genomies 8: 347-350.
18. Wienberg J, Stanyon R (1995) Chromosome painting in mammals as an approach to comparative genomics. Curr Opin Genet Dev 5: 792-797.
19. Willison KR, Dudley K, Potter J (1986) Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of a haploid expressed gene encoding t complex polypeptide 1. Cell 44: 727-738.
20. Yang F, O'Brien PCM, Ferguson-Smith MA (2000) Comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and Chinese hamster defined by reciprocal chromosome painting. Chromosome Res 8: 219-227.
21. Yosida TH (1979) Possible evidence for the karyotype evolution of the Indian spiny mouse due to tandem fusion of the house mouse chromosomes. Proc Jpn Acad 55: 270-274.