Auditory evoked field at threshold

Hearing Research

Volumn 228, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 188-200

  Lütkenhöner, Bernd ^a   Klein, Jan Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MÜNSTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Auditory evoked field; Intensity coding; Magnetoencephalography; Multiple look model; Temporal integration

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SOUND PRESSURE; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL CONDUCTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; REACTION TIME; REFRACTORY PERIOD, ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 34247548810     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2007.02.011     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Algom D., and Babkoff H. Auditory temporal integration at threshold: theories and some implications of current research. In: Neff W.D. (Ed). Contributions to Sensory Physiology vol. 8 (1984), Academic Press, New York 131-159
2. Bak C.K., Lebech J., and Saermark K. Dependence of the auditory evoked magnetic field (100 ms signal) of the human brain on the intensity of the stimulus. Electroencephalogr. clin. Neurophysiol. 61 (1985) 141-149
3. Biermann S., and Heil P. Parallels between timing of onset responses of single neurons in cat and of evoked magnetic fields in human auditory cortex. J. Neurophysiol. 84 (2000) 2426-2439
4. Clock Eddins A., Salvi R.J., Wang J., and Powers N.L. Threshold-duration functions of chinchilla auditory nerve fibers. Hear. Res. 119 (1998) 135-141
5. Eddins D.A., and Green D.M. Temporal integration and temporal resolution. In: Moore B.C.J. (Ed). Hearing (1995), Academic Press, San Diego 207-242
6. Eggermont J.J., and Odenthal D.W. Action potentials and summating potentials in the normal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 316 (1974) 39-61
7. Elberling C., and Don M. Threshold characteristics of the human auditory brain stem response. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 81 (1987) 115-121
8. Elberling C., and Don M. Detecting and assessing synchronous neural activity in the temporal domain (SNR, response detection). In: Burkard R.F., Eggermont J.J., and Don M. (Eds). Auditory Evoked Potentials. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications (2007), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 102-123
9. Elberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., and Saermark K. Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex. Influence of stimulus intensity. Scand. Audiol. 10 (1981) 203-207
10. Elberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., and Saermark K. Auditory magnetic fields: source location and 'tonotopical organization' in the right hemisphere of the human brain. Scand. Audiol. 11 (1982) 61-65
11. Firszt J.B., Chambers R.D., Kraus N., and Reeder R.M. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users I: effects of stimulus current level and electrode site on the electrical ABR, MLR, and N1-P2 response. Ear Hear 23 (2002) 502-515
12. Forss N., Mäkelä J.P., McEvoy L., and Hari R. Temporal integration and oscillatory responses of the human auditory cortex revealed by evoked magnetic fields to click trains. Hear. Res. 68 (1993) 89-96
13. Gage N.M., and Roberts T.P. Temporal integration: reflections in the M100 of the auditory evoked field. NeuroReport 11 (2000) 2723-2726
14. Garner W.R. The effect of frequency spectrum on temporal integration of energy in the ear. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 19 (1947) 808-815
15. Green D.M., Birdsall T.G., and Tanner Jr. W.P. Signal detection as a function of signal intensity and duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 29 (1957) 523-531
16. Hari R. The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex. In: Grandori F., Hoke M., and Romani G.L. (Eds). Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Advances in Audiology vol. 6 (1990), Karger, Basel 222-282
17. Heil P., and Neubauer H. Temporal integration of sound pressure determines thresholds of auditory-nerve fibers. J. Neurosci. 21 (2001) 7404-7415
18. Heil P., and Neubauer H. A unifying basis of auditory thresholds based on temporal summation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100 (2003) 6151-6156
19. Heinz M.G., and Young E.D. Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss. J. Neurophysiol. 91 (2004) 784-795
20. Hoppe U., Rosanowski F., Iro H., and Eysholdt U. Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users. Scand. Audiol. 30 (2001) 119-125
21. Hughes J.W. The threshold of audition for short periods of stimulation. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 133 (1946) 486-490
22. Hyde M. The N1 response and its application. Audiol. Neurootol. 2 (1997) 281-307
23. Joutsiniemi S.L., Hari R., and Vilkman V. Cerebral magnetic responses to noise bursts and pauses of different durations. Audiology 28 (1989) 325-333
24. Klug A., Khan A., Burger R.M., Bauer E.E., Hurley L.M., Yang L., Grothe B., Halvorsen M.B., and Park T.J. Latency as a function of intensity in auditory neurons: influences of central processing. Hear. Res. 148 (2000) 107-123
25. Krishna B.S. Comment on "Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: a computer model". [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119, 406-417 (2006)]. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) 591-593
26. Liberman M.C. Auditory-nerve response from cats raised in a low-noise chamber. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63 (1978) 442-455
27. Lütkenhöner B., and Mosher J.C. Source analysis of auditory evoked potentials and fields. In: Burkard R.F., Eggermont J.J., and Don M. (Eds). Auditory Evoked Potentials. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications (2007), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 546-569
28. Lütkenhöner B., and Steinsträter O. High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex. Audiol. Neurootol. 3 (1998) 191-213
29. Lütkenhöner B., Lammertmann C., and Knecht S. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?. Audiol. Neurootol. 6 (2001) 263-278
30. Lütkenhöner B., Krumbholz K., Lammertmann C., Seither-Preisler A., Steinsträter O., and Patterson R.D. Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage 18 (2003) 58-66
31. Lütkenhöner B., Krumbholz K., and Seither-Preisler A. Studies of tonotopy based on wave N100 of the auditory evoked field are problematic. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 935-949
32. Lütkenhöner B., Seither-Preisler A., and Seither S. Piano tones evoke stronger magnetic fields than pure tones or noise, both in musicians and non-musicians. NeuroImage 30 (2006) 927-937
33. Mäkelä J.P. Magnetoencephalography. Auditory evoked fields. In: Burkard R.F., Eggermont J.J., and Don M. (Eds). Auditory Evoked Potentials. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications (2007), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 525-545
34. Marshall L. Decision criteria for pure-tone detection used by two age groups of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. J. Gerontol. 46 (1991) 67-70
35. Marshall L., and Jesteadt W. Comparison of pure-tone audibility thresholds obtained with audiological and two-interval forced-choice procedures. J. Speech Hear. Res. 29 (1986) 82-91
36. Martin B.A., Tremblay K.L., and Stapells D.R. Principles and applications of cortical evoked potentials. In: Burkard R.F., Eggermont J.J., and Don M. (Eds). Auditory Evoked Potentials. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications (2007), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 482-507
37. McEvoy L., Levänen S., and Loveless N. Temporal characteristics of auditory sensory memory: neuromagnetic evidence. Psychophysiology 34 (1997) 308-316
38. Meddis R. Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: a computer model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119 (2006) 406-417
39. Meddis R. Reply to comment on "Auditory-nerve first-spike latency and auditory absolute threshold: a computer model". J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120 (2006) 1192-1193
40. Moore B.C.J. Temporal integration and context effects in hearing. J. Phonetics 31 (2003) 563-574
41. Moran J.E., Tepley N., Jacobson G.P., and Barkley G.L. Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: auditory evoked fields. Brain Topogr. 5 (1993) 229-240
42. Morita T., Naito Y., Nagamine T., Fujiki N., Shibasaki H., and Ito J. Enhanced activation of the auditory cortex in patients with inner-ear hearing impairment: a magnetoencephalographic study. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114 (2003) 851-859
43. Ohlemiller K.K., Echteler S.M., and Siegel J.H. Factors that influence rate-versus-intensity relations in single cochlear nerve fibers of the gerbil. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90 (1991) 274-287
44. Plomp R., and Bouman M.A. Relation between hearing threshold and duration for tone pulses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 31 (1959) 749-758
45. Ross B., Lütkenhöner B., Pantev C., and Hoke M. Frequency-specific threshold determination with the CERAgram method: basic principle and retrospective evaluation of data. Audiol. Neurootol. 4 (1999) 12-27
46. Stapells D.R. Cortical event-related potentials to auditory stimuli. In: Katz J., Burkard R.F., and Medwetsky L. (Eds). Handbook of Clinical Audiology. fifth ed. (2002), Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia 378-406
47. Stufflebeam S.M., Poeppel D., Rowley H.A., and Roberts T.P. Peri-threshold encoding of stimulus frequency and intensity in the M100 latency. NeuroReport 9 (1998) 91-94
48. Versnel H., Schoonhoven R., and Prijs V.F. Single-fibre and whole-nerve responses to clicks as a function of sound intensity in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 59 (1992) 138-156
49. Viemeister N.F., and Wakefield G.H. Temporal integration and multiple looks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90 (1991) 858-865
50. Williamson S.J., Lu Z.L., Karron D., and Kaufman L. Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr. 4 (1991) 169-180
51. Winter I.M., Robertson D., and Yates G.K. Diversity of characteristic frequency rate-intensity functions in guinea pig auditory nerve fibres. Hear. Res. 45 (1990) 191-202
52. Zwislocki J. Analysis of some auditory characteristics. In: Luce R.D., Bush R.R., and Galanter E. (Eds). Handbook of Mathematical Psychology vol. III (1965), Wiley, New York 1-97