Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users

Scandinavian Audiology

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 119-125

  Hoppe, Ulrich ^a   Rosanowski, Frank ^a   Iro, Heinrich ^a   Eysholdt, Ulrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cochlear implant; Late auditory evoked potentials; Loudness scaling; Objective measurements; Speech processor fitting

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; HEARING; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

ADULT; AGED; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; DEAFNESS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; HUMANS; LOUDNESS PERCEPTION; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOM ALLOCATION; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0035008804     PISSN: 01050397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/010503901300112239     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with current level. Hear Res 1991a;51:123-37.
2. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: refractory properties and strength-duration. Hear Res 1991b;51:139-48.
3. Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop, JK, et al. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 1999;20:45-59.
4. Allum JHJ, Shallop JK, Hotz M, Pfaltz CR. Characteristics of electrically evoked "auditory" brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1990;19:263-7.
5. Arlinger SD. N1 latencies of the slow auditory evoked potential. Audiology 1976;35:370-5.
6. Brown CJ, Lopez, SM, Hughes, ML, Abbas PJ. Relationship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the clarion speech processor. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:50-7.
7. Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor, data from adults. Ear Hear 2000; 21:151-63.
8. Butler RA, Keidel WD, Spreng M. An investigation of the human cortical Evoked potential under conditions of monaural and binaural stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 1969;68:317-26.
9. Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Rotz LA, Novak MA. Electrically evoked potentials recorded in adult and pediatric clarion implant users. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999,108:58-63.
10. Groenen PAP, Makhdoum M, van den Brin JL, Stollman MHP, Snik AFM, van den Broek, P. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116: 785-90
11. Hohmann V, Kollmeter B. Weiterentwicklung und klinischer Einsatz der Hörfeldskalierung. Audiol Acoust 1995;34:48-59.
12. Hoth S. Measuring late electrically evoked potentials of the auditory system in cochlear implant patients. HNO 1998;46:739-47
13. Kileny PR, Kemnik JL. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brain stem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) response. Am J Otol suppl. 1991;12:37-42.
14. Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Boerst A, Telian SA. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;18:90-2.
15. Kraus N, Micco AG, Koch DB, et al. The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 1993;65:118-24.
16. Mason S. Keynote lecture: objective measures. Am J Otol 1997,18:84-7.
17. Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Electrically evoked responses in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1989;28:230-8.
18. Ponton CW, Don M, Waring MD, Eggermont JJ, Masuda A. Regional dipole source analysis of evoked potentials to acoustic and cochlear implant stimulation. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Wien: Manz. 1994: 3-12.
19. Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A. Maturation of human cortical auditory function: differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1996;17: 430-7.
20. Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B, Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:220-36.
21. Schönweiler R, Wübbelt P, Tolloczko R, Rose C. Classification of passive auditory event-related potentials using discriminant feature maps. Audiol Neurootol 2000;5:69-82.
22. Stephan K, Welzl-Muller K, Stiglbrunner H. Stapedius reflex threshold in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1988;27:227-33.
23. Van den Borne, B, Snik AFM, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Van den Broek P. Stapedius reflex measurements during surgery for cochlear implantation in children. Am J Otol 1996;17:554-8.
24. Wable J, van den Abbeele T, Gallégo S, Frachet B. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:743-53.
25. Zwicker E, Fasti H. Psychoacoustics. Berlin: Springer, 1999.