Piano tones evoke stronger magnetic fields than pure tones or noise, both in musicians and non-musicians

NeuroImage

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 927-937

  Lütkenhöner, Bernd ^a   Seither Preisler, Annemarie ^a   Seither, Stefan ^a  

^a ENT Clinic   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MUSIC; MUSICIAN; NOISE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELDS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSIC; NOISE;

EID: 33645745850     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.10.034     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Chait M., Simon J.Z., and Poeppel D. Auditory M50 and M100 responses to broadband noise: functional implications. NeuroReport 15 (2004) 2455-2458
2. Ehret G., and Merzenich M.M. Complex sound analysis (frequency resolution, filtering and spectral integration) by single units of the inferior colliculus of the cat. Brain Res. 472 (1988) 139-163
3. Elberling C., Bak C., Kofoed B., Lebech J., and Saermark K. Auditory magnetic fields: source location and 'tonotopical organization' in the right hemisphere of the human brain. Scand. Audiol. 11 (1982) 61-65
4. Fishman Y.I., Reser D.H., Arezzo J.C., and Steinschneider M. Complex tone processing in primary auditory cortex of the awake monkey: II. Pitch versus critical band representation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108 (2000) 247-262
5. Fishman Y.I., Volkov I.O., Noh M.D., Garell P.C., Bakken H., Arezzo J.C., Howard M.A., and Steinschneider M. Consonance and dissonance of musical chords: neural correlates in auditory cortex of monkeys and humans. J. Neurophysiol. 86 (2001) 2761-2788
6. Goldstein M.H., and Abeles M. Single unit activity of the auditory cortex. In: Keidel W.D., and Neff W. (Eds). Handbook of Sensory Physiology (1975), Springer, Berlin 199-218
7. Hackett T.A., Stepniewska I., and Kaas J.H. Subdivisions of auditory cortex and ipsilateral cortical connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. J. Comp. Neurol. 394 (1998) 475-495
8. Hari R., Joutsiniemi S.L., and Sarvas J. Spatial resolution of neuromagnetic records: theoretical calculations in a spherical model. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 71 (1988) 64-72
9. Hawley M.L., Melcher J.R., and Fullerton B.C. Effects of sound bandwidth on fMRI activation in human auditory brainstem nuclei. Hear. Res. 204 (2005) 101-110
10. Henderson A.R. The bootstrap: a technique for data-driven statistics. Using computer-intensive analyses to explore experimental data. Clin. Chim. Acta (2005)
11. Hirata Y., Kuriki S., and Pantev C. Musicians with absolute pitch show distinct neural activities in the auditory cortex. NeuroReport 10 (1999) 999-1002
12. Jones S.J., and Perez N. The auditory 'C-process': analyzing the spectral envelope of complex sounds. Clin. Neurophysiol. 112 (2001) 965-975
13. Kaas J.H., and Hackett T.A. Subdivisions of auditory cortex and levels of processing in primates. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 3 (1998) 73-85
14. Kaukoranta E., Hari R., and Lounasmaa O.V. Responses of the human auditory cortex to vowel onset after fricative consonants. Exp. Brain Res. 69 (1987) 19-23
15. Lakatos P., Pincze Z., Fu K.M., Javitt D.C., Karmos G., and Schroeder C.E. Timing of pure tone and noise-evoked responses in macaque auditory cortex. NeuroReport 16 (2005) 933-937
16. Lütkenhöner B. Current dipole localization with an ideal magnetometer system. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43 (1996) 1049-1061
17. Lütkenhöner B. Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation: I. Theory and simulations. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106 (1998) 314-321
18. Lütkenhöner B. Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation: II. Experimental evaluation. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 106 (1998) 322-329
19. Lütkenhöner B. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 8 (2003) 222-233
20. Lütkenhöner B., and Steinsträter O. High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 3 (1998) 191-213
21. Lütkenhöner B., Lammertmann C., Ross B., and Pantev C. Brain stem auditory evoked fields in response to clicks. NeuroReport 11 (2000) 913-918
22. Lütkenhöner B., Krumbholz K., Lammertmann C., Seither-Preisler A., Steinsträter O., and Patterson R.D. Localization of primary auditory cortex in humans by magnetoencephalography. NeuroImage 18 (2003) 58-66
23. Lütkenhöner B., Krumbholz K., and Seither-Preisler A. Studies of tonotopy based on wave N100 of the auditory evoked field are problematic. NeuroImage 19 (2003) 935-949
24. Mäkelä J.P., Hari R., and Leinonen L. Magnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to noise/square wave transitions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 69 (1988) 423-430
25. McEvoy L., Levänen S., and Loveless N. Temporal characteristics of auditory sensory memory: neuromagnetic evidence. Psychophysiology 34 (1997) 308-316
26. Monaghan P., Metcalfe N.B., and Ruxton G.D. Does practice shape the brain?. Nature 394 (1998) 434
27. Moran J.E., Tepley N., Jacobson G.P., and Barkley G.L. Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping: auditory evoked fields. Brain Topogr. 5 (1993) 229-240
28. Oxenham A.J., and Bacon S.P. Cochlear compression: perceptual measures and implications for normal and impaired hearing. Ear Hear. 24 (2003) 352-366
29. Pantev C., Oostenveld R., Engelien A., Ross B., Roberts L.E., and Hoke M. Increased auditory cortical representation in musicians. Nature 392 (1998) 811-814
30. Pantev C., Roberts L.E., Schulz M., Engelien A., and Ross B. Timbre-specific enhancement of auditory cortical representations in musicians. NeuroReport 12 (2001) 169-174
31. Pickles J.O. An Introduction to the Physiology of Hearing (1982), Academic Press, London
32. Pickles J.O. Auditory-nerve correlates of loudness summation with stimulus bandwidth, in normal and pathological cochleae. Hear. Res. 12 (1983) 239-250
33. Rauschecker J.P., and Tian B. Processing of band-passed noise in the lateral auditory belt cortex of the rhesus monkey. J. Neurophysiol. 91 (2004) 2578-2589
34. Reite M., Zimmerman J.T., and Zimmerman J.E. MEG and EEG auditory responses to tone, click and white noise stimuli. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 53 (1982) 643-651
35. Relkin E.M., and Doucet J.R. Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101 (1997) 2735-2740
36. Schneider P., Scherg M., Dosch H.G., Specht H.J., Gutschalk A., and Rupp A. Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians. Nat. Neurosci. 5 (2002) 688-694
37. Seither-Preisler A., Krumbholz K., and Lütkenhöner B. Sensitivity of the neuromagnetic N100m deflection to spectral bandwidth: a function of the auditory periphery?. Audiol. Neuro-Otol. 8 (2003) 322-337
38. Shamma S.A., and Symmes D. Patterns of inhibition in auditory cortical cells in awake squirrel monkeys. Hear. Res. 19 (1985) 1-13
39. Soeta Y., Nakagawa S., and Tonoike M. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in relation to bandwidth variations of bandpass noise. Hear. Res. 202 (2005) 47-54
40. Weinberger., N.M. 1999. Brain anatomy and music. MuSICA research notes volume VI/2 [Online] http://www.musica.uci.edu/mrn/V6I2S99.html.
41. Wessinger C.M., VanMeter J., Tian B., Van Lare J., Pekar J., and Rauschecker J.P. Hierarchical organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13 (2001) 1-7
42. Williamson S.J., Lu Z.L., Karron D., and Kaufman L. Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr. 4 (1991) 169-180
43. Young E.D., and Brownell W.E. Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats. J. Neurophysiol. 39 (1976) 282-300
44. Zwicker E., and Fastl H. Psychoacoustics. Facts and Models (1990), Springer, Berlin