High-precision neuromagnetic study of the functional organization of the human auditory cortex

Audiology and Neuro-Otology

Volumn 3, Issue 2-3, 1998, Pages 191-213

  Lütkenhöner, Bernd ^a   Steinsträter, Olaf ^b  

^a Inst F Experimentelle Audiologie   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Auditory evoked field; Biomagnetism; Current dipole; Heschl's gyrus; Magnetoencephalography; N1m; P2m; Planum temporale; Tonotopy

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPOLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TONOTOPY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY CORTEX; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 2642632761     PISSN: 14203030     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000013790     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Barth D, Sutherling W: Current source density and neuromagnetic analysis of the direct cortical response in rat cortex. Brain Res 1988;450:280-294.
2. Barth D, Sutherling W: Neuromagnetic studies of evoked and spontaneous activity in animals; in Sato S (ed): Magnetoencephalography. Adv Neurol. New York, Raven, 1990, vol 54, pp 119-131.
3. Beaulieu C, Colonnier M: Number of neurons in individual laminae of areas 3b, 4, and 6a of the cat cerebral cortex: A comparison with major visual areas. J Comp Neurol 1989; 279:228-234.
4. Campain R, Minckler J: A note on the gross configurations of the human auditory cortex. Brain Lang 1976;3: 318-323.
5. Cansino S, Williamson S, Karron D: Tonotopic organization of human auditory association cortex. Brain Res 1994;663:38-50.
6. Clarke S, Rivier F: Multiple areas within human auditory cortex: Evidence from cytochrome oxidase, NADPH-diaphorase and acetylcholinesterase patterns. Neuroimage 1997;5:S7.
7. Elberling C, Bak C, Koefoed B, Lebech J, Saermark K: Auditory magnetic fields from the human cortex: Influence of stimulus intensity. Scand Audiol 1981;10:203-207.
8. Hämäläinen M: Functional localization based on measurements with a whole-head magnetometer system. Brain Topogr 1995;7:283-289.
9. Hari R: The neuromagnetic method in the study of the human auditory cortex; in Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani G (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Adv Audiol. Basel, Karger, 1990, vol 6, pp 222-282.
10. Hari R, Mäkelä J: Modification of neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex by masking sounds. Exp Brain Res 1988;71:87-92.
11. Hari R, Pelizzone M, Mäkelä J, Hällström J, Leinonen L, Lounasmaa O: Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to on-and offsets of noise bursts. Audiology 1987; 26:31-43.
12. Huotilainen M, Tiitinen H, Lavikainen J, Ilmoniemi R, Pekkonen E, Sinkkonen J, Laine P, Näätänen R: Sustained fields of tones and glides reflect tonotopy of the auditory cortex. Neuroreport 1995;6:841-844.
13. Hyde M: The N1 response and its application. Audiol Neurootol. 1997;2: 281-307.
14. Jacobson G, Ahmad B, Moran J, Newmann C, Wharton J, Tepley N: Occurrence of auditory evoked field (AEF) N1m and P2m components in a sample of normal subjects. Eur Hear 1992;13:387-395.
15. Johnsrude I, Paus T, Zatorre R, Perry D, Ward G, Evans A: The location of auditory activation foci relative to Heschl's gyri. Neuroimage 1997; 5:S177.
16. Kulynych J, Vladar K, Jones D, Weinberger D: Three-dimensional surface rendering in MRI morphometry: A study of the planum temporale. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1993; 17:529-535.
17. Lantos G, Liu G, Shafer V, Knuth K, Vaughan H: Tonotopic organization of primary auditory cortex: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 1997; 5:S174.
18. Liegois-Chauvel C, Musolino A, Badier J, Marquis P, Chauvel P: Evoked potentials recorded from the auditory cortex in man: Evaluation and topography of the middle latency components. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;92:204-214.
19. Lütkenhöner B: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der neuromagnetischen Quellenanalyse. Münster, Lit, 1992.
20. Lütkenhöner B: Dipole separability in a neuromagnetic source analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998a, in press
21. Lütkenhöner B: Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation: I. Theory and simulations. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998b, in press.
22. Lütkenhöner B: Dipole source localization by means of maximum likelihood estimation. II. Experimental evaluation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1998c, in press.
23. Lütkenhöner B, Grave de Peralta Menendez R: The resolution-field concept. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;102:326-334.
24. Lütkenhöner B, Menninghaus E, Steinsträter O, Wienbruch C, Gissler H, Elbert T: Neuromagnetic source analysis using magnetic resonance images for the construction of source and volume conductor model. Brain Topogr 1995;7:291-299.
25. Lütkenhöner B, Pantev C: The exogenous components of the auditory evoked field: Current status; in Hoke M, Erné S, Okada Y, Romani G (eds): Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1992, pp 143-152.
26. Lütkenhöner B, Pantev C: Time-and frequency-domain analysis of auditory evoked fields; in Pantev C, Elbert T, Lütkenhöner B (eds): Oscillatory Event Related Brain Dynamics. New York, Plenum, 1994, pp 259-274.
27. Lütkenhöner B, Pantev C, Hoke M: Interpretation of auditory evoked magnetic fields in terms of two simultaneously active dipoles. Biomed Res 1992a;13 (suppl 1):17-22.
28. Lütkenhöner B, Pantev C, Hoke M: Source analysis of the auditory evoked field: Bias introduced by the choice of the model; in Dittmar A, Fromment J (eds): Proc IEEE EMBS Satellite Symposium on Neuroscience and Technology, Lyon, 1992b, pp 112-118.
29. McEvoy L, Levänen S, Loveless N: Temporal characteristics of auditory sensory memory: Neuromagnetic evidence. Psychophysiology 1997; 34:308-316.
30. Mäkelä J, Ahonen A, Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi R, Kajola M, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa O, McEvoy L, Salmelin R, Salonen O, Sams M, Simola J, Tesche C, Vasama J: Functional differences between auditory cortices of the two hemispheres revealed by whole-head neuromagnetic recordings. Hum Brain Mapping 1993;1:48-56.
31. Melcher J, Fullerton B, Weisskopff R: Imaging human auditory function from brainstem to cortex. Neuroimage 1997;5:S172.
32. Menninghaus E, Lütkenhöner B, Gonzalez S: Localization of a dipolar source in a skull phantom: Realistic versus spherical model. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1994;41:986-989.
33. Moran J, Jacobson G, Tepley N: Finite difference field mapping; in Hoke M, Erné S, Okada Y, Romani G (eds): Biomagnetism: Clinical Aspects. Amsterdam, Excerpta Medica, 1992, pp 801-805.
34. Moran J, Jacobson G, Tepley N: Evidence for multiple generators in evoked responses using finite difference field mapping. Brain Topogr 1993;5:229-240.
35. Nakasato N, Fujita S, Seki K, Kawamura T, Matani A, Tamura I, Fujiwara S, Yoshimoto T: Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;94:183-190.
36. Nieuwenhuys R, Voogd J, van Huijzen C: The Human Central Nervous System. A Synopsis and Atlas. Berlin, Springer, 1988.
37. Okada Y: Neurogenesis of evoked magnetic fields; in Williamson S, Romani GL, Kaufman L, Modena I (eds): Biomagnetism, an Interdisciplinary Approach. New York, Plenum, 1983, pp 399-408.
38. Pantev C, Bertrand O, Eulitz C, Verkindt C, Hampson S, Schuierer G, Elbert T: Specific tonotopic organizations of different areas of the human auditory cortex revealed by simultaneous magnetic and electric recordings. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1995;94:26-40.
39. Pantev C, Eulitz C, Elbert T, Hoke M: The auditory evoked sustained field: Origin and frequency dependence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;90:82-90.
40. Pantev C, Eulitz C, Hampson S, Ross B, Roberts L: The auditory evoked 'off' response: Sources and comparison with the 'on' and the 'sustained' responses. Ear Hear 1996a;17:255-265.
41. Pantev C, Gallen C, Hampson S, Buchanan S, Sobel D: Reproducibility and validity of neuromagnetic source localization using a large array biomagnetometer. Am J EEG Technol 1991;31:83-101.
42. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Anogianakis G, Wittkowski W: Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex revealed by transient auditory evoked magnetic fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1988;69:160-170.
43. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lehnertz K, Lütkenhöner B, Fahrendorf G, Stöber U: Identification of sources of brain neuronal activity with high spatiotemporal resolution through combination of neuromagnetic source localization (NMSL) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990;75:173-184.
44. Pantev C, Hoke M, Lütkenhöner B, Lehnertz K: Tonotopic organization of the auditory cortex: Pitch versus frequency representation. Science 1989;246:486-488.
45. Pantev C, Lütkenhöner B, Hoke M, Lehnertz K: Comparison between simultaneously recorded auditory-evoked magnetic fields and potentials elicited by ipsilateral, contralateral and binaural tone burst stimulation. Audiology 1986;25:54-61.
46. Pantev C, Roberts L, Elbert T, Ross B, Wienbruch C: Tonotopic organization of the sources of human auditory steady-state responses. Hear Res 1996b;101:62-74.
47. Papanicolaou A, Baumann S, Rogers R, Saydjari C, Amparo E, Eisenberg H: Localization of auditory response sources using magnetoencephalography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Neurol 1990;47:33-37.
48. Picton T, Alain C, Woods D, John M, Scherg M, Valdes-Sosa P, Riera J: Intracerebral sources of the human auditory evoked potentials. Audiol Neurootol, submitted.
49. Reite M, Zimmermann J, Zimmermann J: Magnetic auditory evoked fields: Interhemispheric asymmetry. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1981;51:388-391.
50. Rogers R, Papanicolaou A, Baumann S, Saydjari C, Eisenberg H: Neuromagnetic evidence of a dynamic excitation pattern generating the N100 auditory response. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1990;77:237-240.
51. Romani G: Fundamentals on neuromagnetism; in Williamson S, Hoke M, Stroink G, Kotani M (eds): Advances in Biomagnetism. New York, Plenum, 1989, pp 33-46.
52. Romani G, Williamson S, Kaufman L: Tonotopic organization of the human auditory cortex. Science 1982a; 216:1339-1340.
53. Romani G, Williamson S, Kaufman L, Brenner D: Characterization of the human auditory cortex by the neuromagnetic method. Exp Brain Res 1982b;47:381-393.
54. Schlaug G, Jäncke L, Huang Y, Steinmetz H: In vivo evidence of structural brain asymmetry in musicians. Science 1995;267:699-701.
55. Skoglund T, Pascher R, Berthold CH: Heterogeneity in the columnar number of neurons in different neocortical areas in the rat. Neurosci Lett 1996;208:97-100.
56. Steinmetz H, Rademacher J, Huang Y, Hefter H, Zilles K, Thron A, Freund H: Cerebral asymmetry: MR planimetry of the human planum temporale. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989;13:996-1005.
57. Steinschneider M, Schroeder CE, Arezzo J, Vaughan H Jr: Speech-evoked activity in primary auditory cortex: Effects of voice onset time. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;92:30-43.
58. Steinsträter O, Lütkenhöner B: Three-dimensional reconstruction of the auditory cortices from magnetic resonance images. Audiol Neurootol 1998.
59. Talavage T, Ledden P, Sereno M, Rosen B, Dale A: Multiple phase-encoded tonotopic maps in human auditory cortex. Neuroimage 1997;5:S8.
60. Tiihonen J, Hari R, Kaukoranta E, Kajola M: Interaural interaction in the human auditory cortex. Audiology 1989;28:37-48.
61. Valdes-Sosa P, Marti F, Garcia F, Casanova R: Variable resolution electric-magnetic tomography; in Aine C, Okada Y, Stroink G, Swithenby S, Wood C (eds): Advances in Biomagnetism Research: Biomag96. New York, Springer, 1998, vol 1.
62. Williamson S, Kaufman L: Analysis of neuromagnetic signals; in Gevins A, Remond A (eds): Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. EEG Handbook (revised series). Amsterdam, Elsevier, 1987, vol 1, pp 405-448.
63. Williamson S, Kaufman L: Theory of neuroelectric and neuromagnetic fields; in Grandori F, Hoke M, Romani G (eds): Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields and Electric Potentials. Adv Audiol. Basel, Karger, 1990, vol 6, pp 1-39.
64. Williamson SJ, Lu ZL, Karron D, Kaufman L: Advantages and limitations of magnetic source imaging. Brain Topogr 1991;4:169-180.
65. Winfield D, Gatter K, Powell T: An electron microscopic study of the types and proportions of neurons in the cortex of the motor and visual areas of the cat and rat. Brain 1980;103: 245-258.
66. Witelson S, Glezer I, Kigar D: Women have greater density of neurons in posterior temporal cortex. J Neurosci 1995;15:3418-3428.
67. Woldorff M, Tempelmann C, Fell J, Tegeler C, Gaschler B, Hinrichs H, Heinze H, Scheich H: Lateralized auditory spatial perception and cortical processing contralaterality as studied with fMRI and MEG. Neuroimage 1997;5:S173.
68. Yamamoto T, Williamson S, Kaufman L, Nicholson C, Llinàs R: Magnetic localization of neuronal activity in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:8732-8736.