Back to work: Sights/Sites of difference in gender and organizational communication studies

The SAGE Handbook of Gender and Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 97-122

  Ashcraft, Karen Lee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34247548658     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781412976053.n6     Document Type: Chapter

References (182)

1. Aaltio-Marjosola, I., Lehtinen, J. Male managers as fathers? Contrasting management, fatherhood, and masculinity. Human Relations 51 (1998). 121-136.
2. Acker, J. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society 4 (1990). 139-158. doi:10.1177/089124390004002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
3. Adib, A., Guerrier, Y. The interlocking of gender with nationality, race, ethnicity and class: The narratives of women in hotel work. Gender, Work, & Organization 10 (2003). 413-432. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00204
4. Alcoff, L. Cultural feminism versus poststructuralism: The identity crisisin feminist theory. Signs 13 (1988). 405-436. doi:10.1086/494426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/494426
5. Alcoff, L., & Potter, E. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York: Routledge.
6. Allen, B.J. Feminist standpoint theory: A black woman’s (re)view of organizational socialization. Communication Studies 47 (1996). 257-271. doi:10.1080/10510979609368482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10510979609368482
7. Allen, B.J. Black womanhood and feminist standpoints. Management Communication Quarterly 11 (1998). 575-586. doi:10.1177/0893318998114004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318998114004
8. Allen, B.J. (2003). Difference matters: Communicating social identity inorganizations. Prospects Heights, IL: Waveland.
9. Alvesson, M. Gender relations and identity at work: A case study of masculinities and femininities in an advertising agency. Human Relations 51 (1998). 969-1005.
10. Alvesson, M., Billing, Y.D. Gender and organization: Toward a differentiatedunderstanding. Organization Studies 13 (1992). 73-102. doi:10.1177/017084069201300107 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069201300107
11. Anker, R. (1998). Gender and jobs: Sex segregation of occupations in theworld. Geneva: International Labour Office.
12. Aptheker, B. (1989). Tapestries of life: Women’s work, women’s consciousness, and themeaning of daily experience. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
13. Armstrong, P. (1982). If it’s only women it doesn’t matter so much. In J. West (Ed.), Work, women and the labour market. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
14. Ashcraft, K.L. Managing maternity leave: A qualitative analysis of temporary executive succession. Administrative Science Quarterly 44 (1999). 240-280. doi:10.2307/2666996 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2666996
15. Ashcraft, K.L. Empowering "professional" relationships: Organizational communication meets feminist practice. Management Communication Quarterly 13 (2000). 347-392. doi:10.1177/0893318900133001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318900133001
16. Ashcraft, K.L. Organized dissonance: Feminist bureaucracy as hybridform. Academy of Management Journal 44 (2001). 1301-1322. doi:10.2307/3069402 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3069402
17. Ashcraft, K.L. (2004). Gender, discourse, and organization: Framing a shifting relationship. In D. Grant, C. Hardy, C. Oswick, & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 275-298). London: Sage doi:10.4135/9781848608122 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608122.
18. Ashcraft, K.L. (2005a). Feminist organizational communication studies: Engaging gender inpublic and private. In S. May & D. K. Mumby (Eds.), Engaging organizational communication theory and research: Multiple perspectives (pp. 141-169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452204536 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452204536
19. Ashcraft, K.L. Resistance through consent? Occupational identity, organizational form, and the maintenance of masculinity among commercial airlinepilots. Management Communication Quarterly 19 (2005b). 67-90. doi:10.1177/0893318905276560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318905276560
20. Ashcraft, K.L., Flores, L.A. "Slaves with white collars": Decoding a contemporary crisis of masculinity. Text and Performance Quarterly 23 (2003). 1-29. doi:10.1080/10462930310001602020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462930310001602020
21. Ashcraft, K.L., & Mumby, D.K. (2004). Reworking gender: A feminist communicology of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452229461 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452229461
22. Ashcraft, K.L., Pacanowsky, M.E. "A woman’s worst enemy": Reflections on a narrative of organizational life and female identity. Journal of Applied Communication Research 24 (1996). 217-239. doi:10.1080/00909889609365452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00909889609365452
23. Barley, S.R. Technicians in the workplace: Ethnographic evidence for bringingwork into organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1996). 404-441. doi:10.2307/2393937 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393937
24. Barley, S.R., Kunda, G. Bringing work back in. Organization Science 12 (2001). 76-95. doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.1.76.10122
25. Bass, B.M., Avolio, B. Shatter the glass ceiling: Women make better managers. Human Resource Management 33 (1994). 549-560. doi:10.1002/hrm.3930330405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930330405
26. Bederman, G. (1995). Manliness and civilization: A cultural history of gender and racein the United States, 1880-1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Bloor, G., Dawson, P. Understanding professional culture in organizationalcontext. Organization Studies 15 (1994). 275-295. doi:10.1177/017084069401500205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084069401500205
28. Bradley, H. (1989). Men’s work, women’s work. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
29. Bradley, H. (1993). Across the great divide: The entry of men into women’s jobs. In C. L. Williams (Ed.), Doing "women’s work": Men in nontraditional occupations (pp. 10-27). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Brewis, J., Linstead, S. "The worst thing is the screwing" (1): Consumption and the management of identity in sex work. Gender, Work and Organization 7 (2000a). 84-97. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00096
31. Brewis, J., Linstead, S. "The worst thing is the screwing" (2): Context and career in sexwork. Gender, Work and Organization 7 (2000b). 168-180. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00105 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00105
32. Britton, D.M. Gendered organizational logic: Policy and practice in men’s and women’s prisons. Gender and Society 11 (1997). 796-818. doi:10.1177/089124397011006005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124397011006005
33. Britton, D.M. The epistemology of the gendered organization. Gender and Society 14 (2000). 418-434. doi:10.1177/089124300014003004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124300014003004
34. Burke, R.J., & McKeen, C.A. (1992). Women in management. In I.T. Robertson (Ed.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 245-283). New York: John Wiley.
35. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
36. Butterfield, D.A., & Grinnell, J.P. (1999). "Reviewing" gender, leadership, and managerial behavior: Do threedecades of research tell us anything? In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 223-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage doi:10.4135/9781452231365 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452231365.
37. Buzzanell, P.M. Reframing the glass ceiling as a socially constructed process: Implications for understanding and change. Communication Monographs 62 (1995). 327-354. doi:10.1080/03637759509376366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376366
38. Calás, M.B., Smircich, L. Dangerous liaisons: The "feminine-in-management" meets"globalization." Business Horizons 36 (1993). 71-81.
39. Calás, M.B., & Smircich, L. (1996). From "the woman’s point of view": Feminist approaches toorganization studies. In W.R. Nord (Ed.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 218-257). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Canary, D.K., Hause, K.S. Is there any reason to study sex differences in communication? Communication Quarterly 41 (1993). 129-144. doi:10.1080/01463379309369874 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463379309369874
41. Carlone, D., Taylor, B. Organizational communication and cultural studies. Communication Theory 8 (1998). 337-367. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00224.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00224.x
42. Carrigan, R., Connell, R., Lee, J. Toward a new sociology of masculinity. Theory and Society 14 (1985). 551-604. doi:10.1007/BF00160017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00160017
43. Cheng, C. (Ed.). (1996). Masculinities in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44. Chusmir, L.H. Men who make non-traditional career choices. Journal of Counseling & Development 69 (1990). 11-16. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb01446.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6676.1990.tb01446.x
45. Clair, R.P. The political nature of the colloquialism "A real job": Implications for organizational socialization. Communication Monographs 63 (1996). 249-267. doi:10.1080/03637759609376392 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759609376392
46. Cockburn, C. (1983). Brothers: Male dominance and technological change. London: Pluto Press.
47. Cockburn, C. (1985). Machinery of dominance: Women, men and technicalknow-how. London: Pluto Press.
48. Collinson, D. (1992). Managing the shop floor: Subjectivity, masculinity, and workplace culture. New York: DeGruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110879162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110879162
49. Collinson, D., Hearn, J. Naming men as men: Implications for work, organization and management. Gender, Work, & Organization 1 (1994). 2-22.
50. Collinson, D., & Hearn, J. (1996a). "Men" at "work": Multiple masculinities/multiple workplaces. In M. Macan Ghaill (Ed.), Understanding masculinities: Social relations and culturalarenas (pp. 61-76). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
51. Collinson, D., & Hearn, J. (Eds.). (1996b). Men as managers, managers as men: Critical perspectives on men, masculinities and managements. London: Sage.
52. Collinson, D., & Knights, D. (1986). "Men only": Theories and practices of job segregation ininsurance. In H. Willmott (Ed.), Gender and the labour process (pp. 141-178). Aldershot, UK: Gower.
53. Connell, R.W. The big picture: Masculinities in recent world history. Theory and Society 22 (1993). 597-623. doi:10.1007/BF00993538 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00993538
54. Connell, R.W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55. Coyle, A. (1982). Sex and skill in the organisation of the clothingindustry. In J. West (Ed.), Work, women and the labour market. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
56. Crompton, R., & Sanderson, K. (1990). Gendered jobs and social change. London: Unwin Hyman.
57. Cross, S., Bagilhole, B. Girls’ jobs for the boys? Men, masculinity and non-traditionaloccupations. Gender, Work, & Organization 9 (2002). 204-226. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00156 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00156
58. Davey, C.L., Davidson, M.J. The right of passage? The experiences of female pilots incommercial aviation. Feminism & Psychology 10 (2000). 195-225. doi:10.1177/0959353500010002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0959353500010002002
59. Davies, C. The sociology of professions and the profession of gender. Sociology 30 (1996). 661-678. doi:10.1177/0038038596030004003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038596030004003
60. Donaldson, M. What is hegemonic masculinity? Theory and Society 22 (1993). 643-657. doi:10.1007/BF00993540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00993540
61. Dougherty, D.S. Dialogue through standpoint: Understanding men’s and women’s standpoints of sexual harassment. Management Communication Quarterly 12 (1999). 436-468. doi:10.1177/0893318999123003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318999123003
62. Eagly, A.H., Johnson, B. Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 108 (1990). 233-256. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.2.233
63. Eagly, A.H Karau, S.J. Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 60 (1991). 685-710. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.5.685
64. Eagly, A.H., Makhijani, M.G., Klonsky, B.G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 111 (1992). 3-22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3
65. Edley, P.P. Discursive essentializing in a woman-owned business: Gendered stereotypes and strategic subordination. Management Communication Quarterly 14 (2000). 271-306. doi:10.1177/0893318900142003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318900142003
66. Ehrenreich, B. (2001). Nickel and dimed: On (not) getting by in America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
67. Eisenhart, M.A., & Holland, D.C. (1992). Gender constructs and career commitment: The influence of peerculture on women in college. In B. V. Reid (Ed.), Genderconstructs and social issues (pp. 142-180). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
68. Ely, R.J., Meyerson, D.E. Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach toorganizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behaviour 22 (2000). 103-151. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22004-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085%2800%2922004-2
69. Evans, J. Men in nursing: Issues of gender segregation and hiddenadvantage. Journal of Advanced Nursing 26 (1997). 226-231. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026226.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997026226.x
70. Fagenson, E.A. (Ed.). (1993). Women in management: Trends, issues, and challenges in managerial diversity. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
71. Fairhurst, G. The leader-member exchange patterns of women leaders in industry: A discourse analysis. Communication Monographs 60 (1993). 321-351. doi:10.1080/03637759309376316 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637759309376316
72. Faulkner, W. Dualisms, hierarchies and gender in engineering. Social Studies of Science 30(5) (2000). 759-792. doi:10.1177/030631200030005005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030631200030005005
73. Fenstermaker, S., & West, C. (Eds.). (2002). Doing gender, doing difference: Inequality, power and institutional change. New York: Routledge.
74. Ferguson, K. (1984). The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
75. Ferree, M.M., & Martin, P. (Eds.). (1995). Feminist organizations: Harvest of the new women’s movement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
76. Fine, M., Weis, L., Addelston, J., Marusza, J. (In)secure times: Constructing white working class masculinities in the late 20th century. Gender and Society 11 (1997). 52-68. doi:10.1177/089124397011001004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124397011001004
77. Fletcher, J. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice atwork. Cambridge: MITPress.
78. Fraser, N. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text 25/26 (1990-1991). 56-80.
79. Frehill, L.M. The gendered construction of the engineering profession in the United States, 1893-1920. Men and Masculinities 6 (2004). 383-403. doi:10.1177/1097184X03260963 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260963
80. Garrison, D. The tender technicians: The feminization of public librarianship, 1876-1905. Journal of Social History, (1972-1973, Winter). 221-249.
81. Gherardi, S. The gender we think, the gender we do in our everyday organizational lives. Human Relations 47 (1994). 591-610. doi:10.1177/001872679404700602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700602
82. Gherardi, S. (1995). Gender, symbolism and organizational cultures. London: Sage.
83. Gottfried, H. (1994). Learning the score: The duality of control and everydayresistance in the temporary-help service industry. In W. R. Nord (Ed.), Resistance and power in organizations (pp. 102-127). London: Routledge.
84. Gottfried, H., Weiss, P. A compound feminist organization: Purdue University’s Council onthe Status of Women. Women and Politics 14 (1994). 23-44.
85. Gray, B.L. Organizational struggles of working women in the nineteenthcentury. Labor Studies Journal 16 (1991). 16-34.
86. Greene, A.-m. Ackers, P., Black, J. Going against the historical grain: Perspectives on gendered occupational identity and resistance to the breakdown of occupational segregation in two manufacturing firms. Gender, Work, & Organization 9 (2002). 266-285. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00160 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00160
87. Hakim, C. Explaining trends in occupational segregation: The measurement, causes, and consequences of the sexual division of labour. European Sociological Review 8 (1992). 127-152.
88. Hakim, C. Five feminist myths about women’s employment. British Journal of Sociology 46 (1995). 101-118.
89. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
90. Hearn, J. Notes on patriarchy: Professionalization and thesemi-professions. Sociology 16 (1982). 184-202. doi:10.1177/0038038582016002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038582016002002
91. Hearn, J., Sheppard, D., Tancred-Sheriff, P., & Burrell, G. (Eds.). (1989). The sexuality of organization. London: Sage.
92. Heikes, E.J. When men are the minority: The case of men in nursing. Sociological Quarterly 32 (1991). 389-401. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00165.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00165.x
93. Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women’s ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday.
94. Henson, K.D. (1996). Just a temp. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
95. Henson, K.D., Rogers, J.K. "Why Marcia you’ve changed!" Male clerical temporary workersdoing masculinity in a feminized occupation. Gender & Society 15 (2001). 218-238. doi:10.1177/089124301015002004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124301015002004
96. Hinze, S.W. Gender and the body of medicine or at least some body parts:(Re)constructing the prestige hierarchy of medicalspecialties. Sociological Quarterly 40 (1999). 217-239. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb00546.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1999.tb00546.x
97. Hodgson, D. "Taking it like a man": Masculinity, subjection and resistance inthe selling of life assurance. Gender, Work, & Organization 10(1) (2003). 1-21. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00001
98. Holmer Nadesan, M., Trethewey, A. Performing the enterprising subject: Gendered strategies forsuccess (?). Text and Performance Quarterly 20 (2000). 223-250. doi:10.1080/10462930009366299 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462930009366299
99. Hossfeld, K.J. (1993). "Their logic against them": Contradictions in sex, race, and class in Silicon Valley. In P.S. Rothenberg (Ed.), Feminist frameworks: Alternative theoretical accounts of therelations between women and men (pp. 346-358). New York: McGraw-Hill.
100. Iannello, K.P. (1992). Decisions without hierarchy: Feminist interventions inorganizational theory and practice. London: Routledge.
101. Jackson, C. Men’s work, masculinities and gender divisions of labour. Journal of Development Studies 36 (1999). 89-108. doi:10.1080/00220389908422613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220389908422613
102. Jacobs, J.A. (1999). The sex segregation of occupations: Prospects for the 21stcentury. In G. N. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 125-141). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage doi:10.4135/9781452231365 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452231365.
103. Jorgenson, J. Engineering selves: Negotiating gender and identity in technicalwork. Management Communication Quarterly 15 (2002). 350-380. doi:10.1177/0893318902153002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318902153002
104. Kanter, R.M. (1975). Women and the structure of organizations: Explorations in theoryand behavior. In R.M. Kanter (Ed.), Another voice: Feminist perspectives on social life and social science (pp. 34-74). Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
105. Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
106. Kemp, A.A. (1994). Women’s work: Degraded and devalued. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
107. Kennelly, I. "I would never be a secretary": Reinforcing gender in segregatedand integrated occupations. Gender & Society 16 (2002). 603-624. doi:10.1177/089124302236988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124302236988
108. Kerfoot, D., Knights, D. Management, masculinity and manipulation: From paternalism tocorporate strategy in financial services in Britain. Journal of Management Studies 30 (1993). 659-677. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00320.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00320.x
109. Kerfoot, D., Whitehead, S. Keeping all the balls in the air: Further education and the masculine/managerial subject. Journal of Further and Higher Education 24 (2000). 183-201. doi:10.1080/713677088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713677088
110. Kondo, D.K. (1990). Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
111. Lawson, V. Tailoring is a profession, seamstressing is work: Resisting work and reworking gender identities among artisanal garment workers in Quito. Environment and Planning A 31 (1999). 209-227. doi:10.1068/a310209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a310209
112. Linstead, S. Averting the gaze: Gender and power on the perfumed picketline. Gender, Work, & Organization 2 (1995). 192-205.
113. Linstead, S. Abjection and organization: Men, violence, and management. Human Relations 50 (1997). 1115-1145.
114. Loden, M. (1985). Feminine leadership, or how to succeed in business without beingone of the boys. New York: Times Books.
115. Lupton, B. Maintaining masculinity: Men who do "women’s work." British Journal of Management 11 (2000). 33-48. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.11.s1.4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.11.s1.4
116. Macdonald, K.M. (1995). The sociology of the professions. London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446222188 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446222188
117. Maguire, M., Mohtar, L.F. Performance and the celebration of a subaltern counterpublic. Text and Performance Quarterly 14 (1994). 238-252. doi:10.1080/10462939409366086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10462939409366086
118. Marshall, H., & Wetherell, M. (1989). Talking about career and gender identities: A discourse analysis perspective. In S. Skevington & D. Baker (Ed.), Thesocial identity of women (pp. 106-129). London: Sage.
119. Marshall, J. (1989). Revisioning career concepts: A feminist invitation. In B. Lawrence (Ed.), Handbook of career theory (pp. 275-291). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
120. Martin, J. Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of genderconflict in organizations. Organization Science 1 (1990). 339-359. doi:10.1287/orsc.1.4.339 http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.4.339
121. Martin, P.Y., Collinson, D. "Over the pond and across the water": Developing the field of "gendered organizations." Gender, Work and Organization 9 (2002). 244-265. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00159
122. Martin, S.E. "Outsider within" the station house: The impact of race and gender on black women police. Social Problems 41 (1994). 383-400. doi:10.1525/sp.1994.41.3.03x0445c http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1994.41.3.03x0445c
123. Mies, M. (1986). Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. London: Zed Books.
124. Milkman, R. (1987). Gender at work: The dynamics of job segregation by sex during World War II. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
125. Miller, G.E. The frontier, entrepreneurialism, and engineers: Women copingwith a web of masculinities in an organizational culture. Culture and Organization 8 (2002). 145-160. doi:10.1080/14759550212836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14759550212836
126. Mills, A.J. Man/aging subjectivity, silencing diversity: Organizationalimagery in the airline industry. The case of British Airways. Organization 2 (1995). 243-269. doi:10.1177/135050849522009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135050849522009
127. Mills, A.J. (1997). Dueling discourses: Desexualization versus eroticism in the corporate framing of female sexuality in the British airlineindustry, 1945-1960. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Managing the organizational melting pot: Dilemmas of workplace diversity (pp. 171-198). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452225807 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452225807
128. Mills, A.J. Cockpits, hangars, boys and galleys: Corporate masculinities and the development of British Airways. Gender, Work, & Organization 5 (1998). 172-188. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00055 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00055
129. Mills, A.J., Chiaramonte, P. Organization as gendered communication act. Canadian Journal of Communication 16 (1991). 381-398.
130. Monaghan, L.F. Hard men, shop boys and others: Embodying competence in amasculinist occupation. Sociological Review 50 (2002). 334-355. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.00386 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.00386
131. Morgan, D. (1996). The gender of bureaucracy. In J. Hearn (Ed.), Menas managers, managers as men (pp. 61-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
132. Morgan, D. H.J. (1992). Discovering men. London: Routledge.
133. Morgan, G., Knights, D. Gendering jobs: Corporate strategy, managerial control and the dynamics of job segregation. Work, Employment & Society 5 (1991). 181-200. doi:10.1177/0950017091005002003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0950017091005002003
134. Mumby, D.K. (1993). Feminism and the critique of organizational communication studies. In S. Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook 16 (pp. 155-166). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
135. Mumby, D.K. Feminism, postmodernism, and organizational communication: Acritical reading. Management Communication Quarterly 9 (1996). 259-295. doi:10.1177/0893318996009003001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318996009003001
136. Mumby, D.K. Organizing men: Power, discourse, and the social construction of masculinity(s) in the workplace. Communication Theory 8 (1998). 164-183. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00216.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00216.x
137. Mumby, D.K., Ashcraft, K.L. Striking out from the backwater: Organizational communication studies and gendered organization (a response to Martin and Collinson). Gender, Work and Organization 13 (2006). 68-90. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00296.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2006.00296.x
138. Mumby, D.K., Putnam, L.L. The politics of emotion: A feminist reading of boundedrationality. Academy of Management Review 17 (1992). 465-486.
139. Murphy, A.G. The dialectical gaze: Exploring the subject-object tension in the performances of women who strip. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 32 (2003). 305-335. doi:10.1177/0891241603032003003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891241603032003003
140. Murphy, B.O., & Zorn, T. (1996). Gendered interaction in professional relationships. In J. T. Wood (Ed.), Gendered relationships (pp. 213-232). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
141. Natalle, E.J. (1996). Gendered issues in the workplace. In J. T. Wood (Ed.), Gendered relationships (pp. 253-274). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
142. Nelson, M.W. (1988). Women’s ways: Interactive patterns in predominantly femaleresearch teams. In A. Taylor (Ed.), Women communicating: Studies of women’s talk (pp. 199-232). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
143. Phillips, A., Taylor, B. Sex and skill: Notes toward a feminist economics. Feminist Review 6 (1980). 79-88. doi:10.1057/fr.1980.20 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/fr.1980.20
144. Pierce, J.L. (1995). Gender trials: Emotional lives in contemporary law firms. Berkeley: University of California Press.
145. Pringle, R. (1989a). Bureaucracy, rationality and sexuality: The case of secretaries. In G. Burrell (Ed.), Thesexuality of organization (pp. 158-177). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
146. Pringle, R. (1989b). Secretaries talk: Sexuality, power and work. London: Verso.
147. Prokos, A., Padavic, I. "There oughtta be a law against bitches": Masculinity lessons inpolice academy training. Gender, Work,& Organization 9 (2002). 439-459. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00168 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00168
148. Putnam, L., Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 375-408). London: Sage doi:10.4135/9781848608030 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608030.
149. Reskin, B., & Hartmann, H. (1986). Women’s work, men’s work: Sex segregation on the job. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
150. Rogers, J.K. (2000). Temps: The many faces of the changing workplace. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
151. Rogers, J.K., Henson, K.D. "Hey, why don’t you wear a shorter skirt?" Structuralvulnerability and the organization of sexual harassment in temporary clerical employment. Gender & Society 11 (1997). 215-237. doi:10.1177/089124397011002005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124397011002005
152. Rollins, J. (1997). Invisibility, consciousness of the other, ressentiment. In P. Zavella (Ed.), Situated lives: Gender and culture in everyday life (pp. 255-270). New York: Routledge.
153. Roper, M. (1996). "Seduction and succession": Circuits of homosocial desire inmanagement. In J. Hearn (Ed.), Menas managers, managers as men (pp. 210-226). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
154. Rosener, J.B. Ways women lead. Harvard Business Review 68 (1990). 119-125.
155. Sargent, P. Real men or real teachers? Contradictions in the lives of menelementary teachers. Men and Masculinities 2 (2000). 410-433. doi:10.1177/1097184X00002004003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1097184X00002004003
156. Savage, M., & Witz, A. (Eds.). (1992). Gender and bureaucracy (Vol. 39). Oxford, UK: Blackwell/Sociological Review.
157. Segal, B.E. Male nurses: A case study in status contradiction and prestigeloss. Social Forces 41 (1962). 31-38. doi:10.2307/2572917 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2572917
158. Smith, D. (1987). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
159. Sotirin, P., Gottfried, H. The ambivalent dynamics of secretarial "bitching": Control, resistance, and the construction of identity. Organization 6 (1999). 57-80. doi:10.1177/135050849961003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135050849961003
160. Spencer, A., & Podmore, D. (Eds.). (1987). In a man’s world: Essays on women in male-dominated professions. London: Tavistock.
161. Touhey, J.C. Effects of additional women professionals on ratings of occupational prestige and desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 29 (1974). 86-89. doi:10.1037/h0035742 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0035742
162. Trethewey, A. Reproducing and resisting the master narrative of decline: Midlife professional women’s experiences of aging. Management Communication Quarterly 15 (2001). 183-226. doi:10.1177/0893318901152002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318901152002
163. Walker, H.A., Ilardi, B.C McMahon, A.M., Fennell, M.L. Gender, interaction, and leadership. Social Psychology Quarterly 59 (1996). 255-272. doi:10.2307/2787022 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2787022
164. Weedon, C. (1987). Feminist practice and poststructuralist theory. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
165. West, C., Fenstermaker, S. Doing difference. Gender & Society 9 (1995). 8-37. doi:10.1177/089124395009001002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/089124395009001002
166. West, C., Zimmerman, D. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1 (1987). 125-151. doi:10.1177/0891243287001002002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002
167. Wharton, A.S., Baron, J.N. So happy together? The impact of gender segregation on men atwork. American Sociological Review 52 (1987). 574-587. doi:10.2307/2095595 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095595
168. Wharton, A.S., Baron, J.N. Satisfaction? The psychological impact of gender segregation onwomen at work. Sociological Quarterly 32 (1991). 365-387. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00164.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1991.tb00164.x
169. Wilkins, B.M., Anderson, P.A. Gender differences and similarities in management communication. Management Communication Quarterly 5 (1991). 6-35. doi:10.1177/0893318991005001002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0893318991005001002
170. Williams, C.L. (1989). Gender differences at work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
171. Williams, C.L. The glass escalator: Hidden advantages for men in the "female"professions. Social Problems 39 (1992). 253-267. doi:10.1525/sp.1992.39.3.03x0034h http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/sp.1992.39.3.03x0034h
172. Williams, C.L. (Ed.). (1993). Doing "Women’s work": Men in non-traditional occupations. London: Sage.
173. Williams, C.L. (1995). Still a man’s world: Men who do women’s work. Berkeley: University of California Press.
174. Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working classjobs. New York: Columbia University Press.
175. Witz, A. Patriarchy and professions: The gendered politics of occupationalclosure. Sociology 24 (1990). 675-690. doi:10.1177/0038038590024004007 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0038038590024004007
176. Witz, A. (1992). Professions and patriarchy. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203167786 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203167786
177. Wood, J.T. Gender and moral voice: Moving from women’s nature to standpoint epistemology. Women’s Studies in Communication 15 (1993). 1-24.
178. Wood, J.T. (2003). Gendered lives: Communication, gender, and culture (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
179. Wright, R. (1996). The occupational masculinity of computing. In C. Cheng (Ed.), Masculinities in organizations (pp. 77-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
180. Young, E. On the naming of the rose: Interests and multiple meanings aselements of organizational culture. Organization Studies 10 (1989). 187-206. doi:10.1177/017084068901000204 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/017084068901000204
181. Young, J.L., James, E.H. Token majority: The work attitudes of male flightattendants. Sex Roles 45 (2001). 299-319. doi:10.1023/A:1014305530335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1014305530335
182. Zatz, N.D. Sex work/sex act: Law, labor and desire in constructions of prostitution. Signs 22 (1997). 277-308. doi:10.1086/495157 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/495157